Jump to content
 

Matford

  • entries
    13
  • comments
    40
  • views
    21,108

Matford 'New'


Re6/6

7,968 views

We've taken the decision to take Matford off the exhibition circuit for the time being and to 'do an Eridge' and rebuild it. It has been suffering from several problems in the baseboard department. Firstly we used the dreaded MDF which has swollen to at least +1mm and in some places more. This is due to our proximity to a salt water atmosphere. In hindsight, perhaps these problems could've been avoided with the MDF had we sealed it all, after cutting, with varnish at least.

 

When this problem was discovered we had already half built our replacement DRAG test track for which we were using MDF. So all the boards were thoroughly treated with GRP resin and painted with marine quality paint. These are problem free with good track alignment and work perfectly well considering that they are erected and dismantled twice a month. The original suffered from poor quality deal softwood framework, which ended up looking like the waves of the ocean. So the lesson was learnt that always use the best materiel that can be afforded.

 

The second serious problem was that the side/box frames were made from a synthetic materiel (flooring laminate) which not only warped, it took on a banana shape. It was assumed that such a materiel would be stable, but no so. Avoid it like the plague! We rebuilt the board 'undercariages' with marine ply framework. This improved matters somewhat but the constant expansion on the MDF baseboard top still caused alignment problems. Each board top has subsequently taken on a saucer shape.

 

We are rebuilding the baseboards with the 'new' polyfoam principle, as used by Gordon Gravett on Pempoul. It consists of 1200mm x 500mm x 50mm thick pink polyfoam insulation.(I gather that it's also available in blue, but I've never seen it!). The framework is made from 4mm thick x 100mm deep quality ply glued on with solvent-free grab adhesive. (No More Nails type) To avoid having to hold it altogether whilst the glue goes off with clamps, we have used 3-4 inch long wood screws No 14/16 size which have a large coarse thread, screwed in along the ply sides at 100mm spaces directly into the foam. It's dense enough to allow a very strong grip and bite for the screws to allow the go off. After this has happened the screws are removed for re-use.

blogentry-6728-017713300 1290264348_thumb.jpg

These show the style of construction. They are to be used on the Balcombe Viaduct project. The ply top strip is for the 2 track plain line. They have been made now for over a year and kept in a relatively damp garage without any sign of movement. In fact it is almost impossible to put in any torsional twist.

blogentry-6728-030784300 1290264360_thumb.jpg

Another problem that has come to light is that not all code 82 flat bottom rail is exactly the same. We found that we had used Exactoscale track bases and used C&L rail which is 0.2mm thicker at the rail head, thus making the track 0.4mm tight to gauge. Not acceptable when working in P4! So this also made it easier to decide that a complete track rebuild was also neccessary.

 

All the buildings and as much of the scenery as possible will be salvaged and re-used. We want to preserve the essential 'look' of the layout.

 

That having been decided we sought advice from CK of this parish for his expertise in assessing what 'might have happened' had BR remodelled it all in the early 90s. This was bearing in mind the cost cutting and removal of expensive to maintain S & C work that 'would have happened'! To this end the complex pointwork at the fiddle yard end of the layout will be removed (three-way point and other under used pointwork) and will be replaced with a simple crossover on a new extension board between the FY and the current first scenic board and a new pointwork to the up and down sidings in flat bottom leading to 'older' bullhead trackwork.

blogentry-6728-016563800 1290263984_thumb.jpg

This is the pointwork that is being replaced. You can see the track alignment problems from this snap. (ctsy David Brandreth)

 

This is the first bit of new pointwork (new crossover) made in copperclad FB. It is a BV 10 (1 in 10 angle). Next all the cosmetic bits and pieces will be added. Colin Craig cast 'Pandrol' fittings with clamplocks, and backdrives using Brassmasters cranks all non working! Once all this is done the whole thing will be mounted on 4mm ply and the Tortoise (or the new Cobalt) motors added and fully tested before fitting and gluing to the polyfoam baseboards. Thanks to my old friend Brian Harrap (ZOB and Quai87) for his invaluable advice in F/B point construction.

blogentry-6728-058416200 1290263082_thumb.jpg

blogentry-6728-047186700 1290263160_thumb.jpg

blogentry-6728-028634000 1290263202_thumb.jpg

 

Exactoscale instruction sheet

blogentry-6728-002000300 1290273667_thumb.jpg

  • Like 3

10 Comments


Recommended Comments

That's great to see how someone else has considered using these polystyrene based baseboards - a big improvement although similar concept to what I used on Paxton Road - the ply I've used is rubbish. How do you intend to fit the point motors? I always worried about them 'moving' once fitted to the underside of the foam.

Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Hi James,

 

I'll be using the Exactoscale AXX TAPO Tortoise adaptor plate @ £5.00 for a pack of five. They look to be good value and very robust. They're made from a hard plastic . You fix the Tortoise to it and then screw it the underside of the ply. You'll need some brass rod to fit to the underside of the point blades. I haven't actually tried them yet but I'll post on here when I have. As I said above I'll be fitting the pointwork to it's own piece of ply after cutting holes in the polyfoam so that the tortoise will have clearance, and then glue the whole thing (point+ply base) to the foam. That's the plan anyway!

 

A blurry snap above!

Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium

Good luck with this. I don't envy you the rebuild but I'm sure it will be worth it. I'm using foam boards and like you have been impressed so far.

Link to comment

Another vote for foam boards here - I've had mine for nearly two years in a somewhat damp (in winter) house and they're still pretty stable. I used a skin of 3mm MDF instead of ply, which gives good longitudinal stiffness and hasn't swollen so far.

Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Thanks Andrew and Will, good to hear the polyfoam method seems to be the way to go for the future. Not to mention the lightness and ease of handling. It won't be always the most appropriate in all situations such as the viaduct on the Balcombe/Lewes project mind you!

Link to comment
Guest jim s-w

Posted

Hi Chaps

 

The check rails on FB points are not a \___/ shape but a continuous long curve on the one face only. Might want to have a look at them as they look a bit odd ATM.

 

Were the exactoscale bases the very original ones as sold by Bernard as these were found to be undergauge. The current ones are fine though. We have found Peco code 82 to give the right gauge (as does the EM gauge society stores stuff)

 

HTH

 

Jim

Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Thanks for that Jim. Something that I didn't know. I'll deal with the check rails. The track bases were bought via third party dealer so I couldn't say if they're the old original ones. I do know that when replacing a short length of plain line ready for S4um with the stuff, the rail that I used was 0.2mm narrower at the head and didn't notice it until later! I'll be making sure that I use the appropriate (probably Peco) stuff for the relaying.

Link to comment
Guest jim s-w

Posted

Hiya

 

If you have any bases without the costain logos on them they are the old ones that are undergauge.

 

I only knew about the Check rails When Colin C told me

 

Cheers

 

Jim

Link to comment

There are two codes of rail code 82 the EM Gauage 1m metre which works well with the bases then Code 83 which can ribbon finger tips like nobodys...

 

Ian

Link to comment
The check rails on FB points are not a \___/ shape but a continuous long curve on the one face only.
If we are being fussy then not a continuous curve at all but long gentle tapers with a fairly short straight section just opposite the crossing gap. Taper lengths and angles vary depending on running speed. I can supply appropriate details on request.

Regards

Keith

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...