Jump to content
 

Easton-Griffin 0298 Beattie Well Tank for Pencarrow


2ManySpams
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Premium

Having not yet finished the two other loco kits I've started, it's probably not a good idea starting another one yet. But...a Beattie Well Tank kit arrived at Christmas.

 

This was accidentally obtained from Laurie Griffin at the GoG Telford event in 2015. It's the last of the etches he had (from the original Shedmaster range which I believe was enlarged from the 4mm Jedenco kit?) and doesn't come with the chassis etch as Laurie told me this was dimensionally not right...

 

post-6675-0-75441600-1451081685_thumb.jpg

 

post-6675-0-77867900-1451081808_thumb.jpg

 

Instructions are...sparse...just three sides of A4:

 

post-6675-0-68109400-1451082008.jpg

 

post-6675-0-82903100-1451082047_thumb.jpg

 

post-6675-0-89987900-1451082193.jpg

 

Edit 15-1-16: Stop Press...I'll be using the etches kindly provided by Nick Easton, rather than the Jedenco ones, along with Laurie Griffin's castings in this build. Thread title amended accordingly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

It's obviously an old kit and the etchings don't seem to be up to the standard of Jim's kits, or indeed Laurie's own stuff.

 

On the other hand Laurie's castings are excellent and he included everything I need in the box.

 

post-6675-0-57196700-1451082784_thumb.jpg

 

And the best bit is that we get to play the great Christmas game of match the technical part name to the unmarked packets.

 

post-6675-0-71102300-1451082898_thumb.jpg

 

post-6675-0-08315300-1451082916_thumb.jpg

 

post-6675-0-71040700-1451083135.jpg

 

Also included in the box were a few sheets of brass to be used to thicken up the half-etched cab sides and some Slaters buffers.

 

post-6675-0-90760800-1451083249_thumb.jpg

 

A wander over to the Slaters stand on the same day and the wheels were acquired too.

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Having looked at the parts and instructions I think this kit needs to rest a while longer while more experience is gained. An aide to scratchbuilding?

 

Probably also need to find a chassis or work out how to scratchbuild one...

 

There is of course Pete's blog showing part of his build: http://www.rmweb.co.uk/community/index.php?/blog/blog-1037/cat-573-0298

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Chris,

 

I reckon "Andy's Christmas quiz" and "match the parts list to the weirdly shaped thing" are probably on a par. At least there should be the odd obvious one in there... (At first glance at the quiz, "match the parts list" is likely to be the easier of the two...)

 

Iain Rice did a very good treatise on chassis construction as part of the Whild Swan series. Can look it out if you can't find it. It really does cover everything you need to know to build a working chassis.

 

Watching with interest!

Simon

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never built a 2-4-0 but my 14xx 0-4-2 posed some issues.

 

I purchased a job-lot of kits many years ago which included a Springside cast whitemetal kit for the 14/48xx. This has a milled brass chassis of very substantial material, with drilled & tapped spacers, csk screws and csk holes in the frames to match. The drivers were designed to be rigid, and the trailing axle, which needed to support the whacking great heavy cast cab, was supported in slotted holes in the frames, and a ludicrous cast wm plunger assembly. Not being hugely experienced at the time, I built it as designed, and watched it perform like an unnatural cross between a kangaroo and a pigeon. Unsurprisingly, it rocked like a see-saw about the middle axle on every bump on the track, and under even mild acceleration, attempted to wheelie like something out of the Whacky Races.

 

I then fitted hornblocks to the driving axles, and equalised them with a pair of rocking beams (ie one beam for the horns on each frame) and made a rigid brass central support for the trailing axle thus giving "three-legged-stool" support. This works perfectly, and allows the motor/gearbox drive to the leading or trailing driven axle (trailing [middle] in my case, not sure for the Well Tank). The huge imbalance of the cab & bunker, whilst not ideally placed, is no longer an issue, and the loco works well (albeit I'm sure a MOK version would look better).

 

This, coupled with the likes of Iain Rice's books, made me realise that the kit designer probably doesn't know best, and provided a huge confidence boost to my model making. You don't have to follow the instructions!

 

Enjoy!

Simon

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Thanks all for the thoughts and PM. Looking at Pete's thread, I think he's cracked the way forward in terms of suspension. Pete's notes also think that the boiler and smokebox are undersized. One to keep an eye on.

 

Anyway I've spent all day in the train room but not modelling. We've loads of folk coming over and it's needed as a bedroom. Big tidy needed! Worn out now but we're off to see Star Wars this evening. Yay!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

You have the coupling rods which you can use to mark the spacing for the axles on the chassis. I am sure you are up to it.

Don

It's a big physiological step building a chassis but with everything I've done on the other two kits I'm probably up to it. (famous last words)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very interested in this post as I have made my own etches for this loco. Chassis in 22th nickel and body in 15th. Don't like whitemetal for 7mm.

 

post-4764-0-65346400-1451302016_thumb.jpg

 

The chassis is designed to drive the fixed rear axle with the leading axles compensated with a beam on each side. The motor is 1830 with Brabchlinews gearbox driving under the axle.

 

So the leading wheels can be removed the cylinders etc will be fitted to the footplate using the chassis as a jig.

The crosshead arrangement is interesting as it  runs on clearly visible slippers on the slidebars.

 

post-4764-0-07056100-1451302031_thumb.jpg

 

There is a basic jig on the chassis etch along with the valances to help build up the footplate. The footplate is also relieved where the bends are to be made. The body is designed specifically for 30587. All the chassis parts are on the chassis etch along with a few body bits.

 

T'will be a bit 'til I get round to building it  as I have other things to finish first

 

The best book for 7mm is Geoff Holt's Locomotive Modelling Vol 1 covers chassis

 

Nick

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Very interested in this post as I have made my own etches for this loco. Chassis in 22th nickel and body in 15th. Don't like whitemetal for 7mm.

 

attachicon.gifChassis etch.jpg

 

The chassis is designed to drive the fixed rear axle with the leading axles compensated with a beam on each side. The motor is 1830 with Brabchlinews gearbox driving under the axle.

 

So the leading wheels can be removed the cylinders etc will be fitted to the footplate using the chassis as a jig.

The crosshead arrangement is interesting as it runs on clearly visible slippers on the slidebars.

 

attachicon.gifBody etch.jpg

 

There is a basic jig on the chassis etch along with the valances to help build up the footplate. The footplate is also relieved where the bends are to be made. The body is designed specifically for 30587. All the chassis parts are on the chassis etch along with a few body bits.

 

T'will be a bit 'til I get round to building it as I have other things to finish first

 

The best book for 7mm is Geoff Holt's Locomotive Modelling Vol 1 covers chassis

 

Nick

Fantastic bit of etch design there Nick. I've got Geoff's two books, they have been very useful so far in helping me work out how to do stuff.
Link to post
Share on other sites

If I were doing mine now I would of scrapped the already stated frames, and used side beams on the drivers, and have the leading wheel rocking. At the time I thought it would be quicker to adapt what I already had.

 

I think there is a drawing in the Beatties classes by Bradley. If I remember correctly it is of an as built. But I would imaging the under pinnings would be the same.

 

I think PDSWR went even further by changing cab sheet etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

It comes with the LSWR/SR/BR(S) territory Chris! You could be boring and model the GWR!! But then the 0-6-0PT was hardly a walk in the park........ ;-)

Nice to see you back and posting Paul, even with remarks like that !

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do seem to pick the more difficult wheel arrangements don't I!

It might be an odd wheel arrangement. But you need to treat it like a 0-6-0. No side play on the front carrying wheels as it will foul the slide bars etc. A little play on the front drivers and again non on the rear.

 

And back doing modelling after 6+ months of mojo loss*. And at the last count I now have more GWR locos than SR ones (thank you Mr Klein and the products of Ixion and Minerva, not that I complaining!). The theory is that one day/sometimes/whenever, a shunting plank for small GW locos. My other theory is that if you don't buy when product is available, one will regret it later.

 

Anyway, back to BWTs; in addition to scratchbuilt cab sides and rear bunker, part of the splashers in the cab were hand made, cannot remember why now and altering the rear cab sheet. As supplied, it is straight. Reference to 3298 many years ago showed that it folds into the cab for about 9" or so, then folds down again to the floor. There were other small additions based on photographs. Fortunately they were well photographed and two survive today.

 

* The adoption by my wife and I of three rescue ponies also occupy our time and they need to be seen to and fed daily unlike etched brass kits!!!

Nice to see you back. From what I remember there is very little of the inside of the cab in the etches.

 

Its looking asthough there will soon be enough BWT's to build Wadebridge!!!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

...

Not sure that we need to go quite that far with our models. For one thing, our track beds are usually rather firmer and more rigid than early railways in North America or contractors' lines.

 

I wasn't suggesting we should but someone mentioned one method as being 'truer' I thought it is a bit more complicated than that. Due to the different dynamics caused by scaling we have different issues to full size (has anyone had a frame crack? probably but not a big issue) and therefore we need to find solution that work for models whilst appearing to match the full size.

Don

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...