BR(S) Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 (edited) http://www.kernowmodelrailcentre.com/p/51692/32-384Z-Bachmann-Class-37-Diesel-Locomotive-number-37-672 Can also be ordered DCC Fitted and DCC Sound Fitted. Edited January 22, 2016 by BR(S) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deltic Man Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Just ordered mine Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
daveymills Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 no-one tell them that 37672 was an RSH-built machine and this one is VF-built.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob D2 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Correct me if I'm wrong, And I hope to the fullest extent I am, but that KMRC shot has 672 without the extra bars on the cantrail louvred that the real one had ? This was why when Bachmann originally did 672 it limited the renumber options I think ? Please tell me I'm wrong.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob D2 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Sorry didn't see daveys post..... On the flip side would make renumber ing better options for other BZ locos... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
daveymills Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 depending on what livery you choose, it could be renumbered at least to : 667, 669, 673, 674, 680, 681, 684, 685, 686, 688, 693, 695, 696 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob D2 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 It's a shame they didn't do some with transrail branding, I'm not certain how hard the RFD logos would be to come off Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clay Country Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Bachmann previously did a model of 672 with Transrail markings (mine went back to RfD). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
david12345 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Just compared the pics to the original 37672 in Transrail and its a different body moulding. I think the original is the right moulding with the correct cantrail grilles. I'll probably get one anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob D2 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 STOP PRESS ! Just checked KMRC Facebook page - someone else was querying the cock up, Apparently the bars are there they just don't show up in the photo for some reason, So all should be well ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjl1973 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Looks like on the nose grilles on one end the dividing bar is there, don't think it should have them looking at pics Simon Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
class"66" Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Looks very nice better get saving now... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BR(S) Posted January 23, 2016 Author Share Posted January 23, 2016 (edited) STOP PRESS ! Just checked KMRC Facebook page - someone else was querying the cock up, Apparently the bars are there they just don't show up in the photo for some reason, So all should be well ! If you look at the picture in the DCC Sound Fitted link (http://www.kernowmodelrailcentre.com/p/51693/32-384ZDS-Bachmann-Class-37-Diesel-Locomotive-number-37-672), the dividing bars are visible. They don't show up in the one I linked to for some reason. Edited January 23, 2016 by BR(S) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium Hilux5972 Posted January 23, 2016 RMweb Premium Share Posted January 23, 2016 Is this the one that was meant for Olivia's? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob D2 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Nope Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Strange... Looking at the photos on their website I would say there are 2 pics of different models. One has the cantrail grille dividers and no dividers in the nose grilles at either end, whilst the other has no dividers in cantrail grilles but dividers in nose grilles at both ends. I wonder if one was a livery mockup and the other the final goods? I struggle to believe that they just don't show in the photo given so clear in one and absent in other and photos taken at same angle and conditions... Unless photos have been adjusted? But here's the catch... As far as I can tell (and someone may prove me wrong) neither is correct for 672. She should have cantrail dividing grilles but on nose grilles she should have dividers at left hand end only as you look at side, with no dividers on grilles at right hand end. Bach got this right on their original 672 (I know as when renumbered I tried to add dividers on right hand end... Poorly only to realise machine I was trying to model shouldn't have had cantrail dividers... D'oh). Checking photos on web this seems to be case though may have changed over life of machine? Agree this (if photo depicts final model) isn't same body moulding that would have been used for Olivia's 37405 but wonder whether this was slotted into production slot when 405 cancelled. Looks to be available immediately with no prior announcement... M Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrB Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Agree with the nose end grills. Various photos on Flickr show the No1 end drivers side is the only nose end set which are the original divided grills and the other 3 sets are the refurbished type with no dividers. No idea which are the final photos, just have to wait and see, at least if incorrect the grills can be replaced with etches. Regards Roy Strange... Looking at the photos on their website I would say there are 2 pics of different models. One has the cantrail grille dividers and no dividers in the nose grilles at either end, whilst the other has no dividers in cantrail grilles but dividers in nose grilles at both ends. I wonder if one was a livery mockup and the other the final goods? I struggle to believe that they just don't show in the photo given so clear in one and absent in other and photos taken at same angle and conditions... Unless photos have been adjusted? But here's the catch... As far as I can tell (and someone may prove me wrong) neither is correct for 672. She should have cantrail dividing grilles but on nose grilles she should have dividers at left hand end only as you look at side, with no dividers on grilles at right hand end. Bach got this right on their original 672 (I know as when renumbered I tried to add dividers on right hand end... Poorly only to realise machine I was trying to model shouldn't have had cantrail dividers... D'oh). Checking photos on web this seems to be case though may have changed over life of machine? Agree this (if photo depicts final model) isn't same body moulding that would have been used for Olivia's 37405 but wonder whether this was slotted into production slot when 405 cancelled. Looks to be available immediately with no prior announcement... M Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rob D2 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Maybe they just kept it quiet till it was ready. Interesting about the olivias - that would make sense if they were in fact trying to fit a prototype to the body moulding rather than vice versa. I can't believe they would choose to model a 3 TG engine with a number that's already been done Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tractor_37260 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Strange... Looking at the photos on their website I would say there are 2 pics of different models. One has the cantrail grille dividers and no dividers in the nose grilles at either end, whilst the other has no dividers in cantrail grilles but dividers in nose grilles at both ends. I wonder if one was a livery mockup and the other the final goods? I struggle to believe that they just don't show in the photo given so clear in one and absent in other and photos taken at same angle and conditions... Unless photos have been adjusted? But here's the catch... As far as I can tell (and someone may prove me wrong) neither is correct for 672. She should have cantrail dividing grilles but on nose grilles she should have dividers at left hand end only as you look at side, with no dividers on grilles at right hand end. Bach got this right on their original 672 (I know as when renumbered I tried to add dividers on right hand end... Poorly only to realise machine I was trying to model shouldn't have had cantrail dividers... D'oh). Checking photos on web this seems to be case though may have changed over life of machine? Agree this (if photo depicts final model) isn't same body moulding that would have been used for Olivia's 37405 but wonder whether this was slotted into production slot when 405 cancelled. Looks to be available immediately with no prior announcement... M 37 672 was as RSH build so should have cantrail grille supports/dividers, although it is strange how some photos of the model show them, others not ? As for the nose end grills, Drivers side nose grilles at both ends should have the central divider, both second man's side grilles being plain with no divider. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
locoholic Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Kernow's Facebook page says they've got the Bachmann model of DRS 37 402 that Olivia's Trains rejected. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mevaman Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Chris has confirmed on Facebokk that some of the images of 37672 are incorrect and he will upload the images of the production model on Monday. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
class37418stag Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 Class 37672 based st blazey Cornwall and they been running from Cornwall to up to Scotland and they has or not has service in Scotland then return to south to Cornwall? By the twin class 37 to Scotland by China slurry wagon Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GordonC Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 Class 37672 based st blazey Cornwall and they been running from Cornwall to up to Scotland and they has or not has service in Scotland then return to south to Cornwall? By the twin class 37 to Scotland by China slurry wagon yes Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
class37418stag Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 yes Yes thank you what about class 37 x 2 need refuel before go south to Cornwall? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
muddys-blues Posted January 26, 2016 Share Posted January 26, 2016 I have a Bachmann 37 009 body in RFD done by Peakdale works if any is interested .... PM me. Craig. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now