dasatcopthorne Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 I'm Pleased to be able to let you know that our Club's layout has appeared in the above magazine just published. I'll just sit back now and wait for the discussion to begin! Dave Smith Carshalton & Sutton MRC. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeH_83 Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 Very nice, All made in 4-sf or the 00 flexi and 4-sf points way? Had to adjust the wheels on much stuff? I always like to hear how well it works from people as I am about to start mine Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dasatcopthorne Posted May 19, 2017 Author Share Posted May 19, 2017 Very nice, All made in 4-sf or the 00 flexi and 4-sf points way? Had to adjust the wheels on much stuff? I always like to hear how well it works from people as I am about to start mine Hi Mike. Falcon Road etc., etc is all 00SF. Only because I built all the track so there was no point in doing 00 and 00SF. Works just fine. No adjusting on anything, loco wise. All are from what we might call the 'new era of RTR models. No Lima, Wrenn or Triang. Two boards of Falcon Road are 'borrowed' from another layout and this other layout started with some track build using Exactoscale 00 track bases for platform roads. However, the track at the front edge of the layout uses wooden sleepers. All the P & C is also 00SF. The construction story of Falcon Road is in the 'Layout Topics' section of RMweb. It shows a lot of track details. Good luck. Dave. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mightbe Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 I shall await the chorus of ignorant naysayers. Quentin Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMweb Premium polybear Posted May 21, 2017 RMweb Premium Share Posted May 21, 2017 (edited) It'll never work, and never catch on..... Edited May 21, 2017 by polybear 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dasatcopthorne Posted May 21, 2017 Author Share Posted May 21, 2017 One thing is, I haven't seen the Mag yet so I don't know if the article was clearly labelled 00SF 16.2. When I told the editor prior to writing the article he was quite keen that I should explain what 16.2 was all about. I'll have to try to find a copy. Dave Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dasatcopthorne Posted May 28, 2017 Author Share Posted May 28, 2017 Well. At last I have a copy of the mag and the layout is clearly a labelled as 00-SF. (Sorry Martin). Also my explanation of 00-SF has been included without alteration. Very pleased. Dave 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junctionmad Posted May 28, 2017 Share Posted May 28, 2017 It'll never work, and never catch on..... well it may work in practice but will it work in theory Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now