Jump to content
 

Sandy's lock down work bench.


Recommended Posts

Today was a painting and varnishing day!

 

post-7733-0-32490200-1517859897_thumb.jpg

 

Undercoat on the Class 20 body

 

Black on Class 20 chassis/footplate

 

Black and varnish on repaired Jinty cab that took a dive off a friends layout.

 

Undercoat on a HR timber wagon.

 

Varnish on a pair of HR Ballast Wagons

 

Varnish on a Hudswell  0-6-0 diesel.

 

Varnish on the A3

 

post-7733-0-37868000-1517859931_thumb.jpg

 

Regards

Sandy

 

  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

With appologies for the delay I have now quickly scanned the bits of the drawing. As I said they are not fully complete yet and there is still much to do. I hope they are useful.

 

 

First the cab side on showing the reverser.

post-5625-0-30656000-1517944286_thumb.jpg

 

This shows the cab side on, a vertical view of the cab and a view of the Scottish additional wind screens.

post-5625-0-60362600-1517944312_thumb.jpg

 

post-5625-0-53294900-1517944300_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

A while ago I took on a JLTRT Class 20 build for a friend. Here is the latest update. The painting and detailing has been completed and just awaiting the arrival of the sound chip.

 She has just received her final coat of varnish and I now have to carefully remove the masking on the windows.

 

post-7733-0-05561600-1518248254_thumb.jpg

 

Regards

Sandy

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

...…. and a beautiful job it was too.

 

Thanks Sandy.

 

PS I noticed your last "Bench" post on here was February 2018.

Have I lost track of you or are you taking a break. 

No , still here beavering away at the modelling bench but nothing much of great interest that lends itself to a decent posting.

Actually mostly repairs etc at the moment.

One item of interest was a Crab that had a noisy motor and I was asked to fit a new one. Part of the history was that it had been used on a 24volt layout and someone had driven it rather hard and damaged the original motor so it had a 24volt motor fitted but then subsequently reverted back to 12 volt use.When I got it on the workbench I found that it had a pair of enormous resistors fitted in the tender!! It also had press-on cast wheels, so some brute force was required to get it all apart and then a lot of tweaking to get the quartering back to where it was originally.

Anyway, it has now got a very quiet, ex-Ron Chaplin, motor gearbox from MSC fitted and on its way back to its owner.

 

 

I should have a new build on the work bench soon so I will get posting now that the nights are drawing in!

 

Regards

Sandy

Link to post
Share on other sites

A friend, who lives in the North of Scotland, has built a beautiful model of 'Findhorn' a small terminus serving a fishing village on the Moray Firth Coast. The line was built by local promoters to join up with the main line of the Inverness and Aberdeen Junction Railway, as it became, at Kinloss near Forres. It was only 3 miles long and did not require much in the way of stock, which was fortunate, as money soon ran out and the directors were forced into buying something cheap to run their little enterprise.
Neilson & Co of Glasgow offered them a contractors engine of a standard design. A very basic 0-4-0 with no cab at a price they could afford. It is thought that it was only tasked with pulling a wagon or two and an ex NBR brake van from the Junction to the village a couple of times a day.

This first photograph shows it in fairly new condition on the branch.

 

post-7733-0-63971100-1538422317_thumb.jpg

Later, when the Findhorn Railway was absorbed by the I&JRly, and by now the little engine was in need of some TLC, it was taken to Lochgorm in Inverness where Stroudley rebuilt it by removing the Gab gear and replacing it with Stevensons Link. He also increased the wheel base by moving the front axle forward by approximately a foot. Probably to try and improve the running. Eventually it was sold to a contractor building the Caithness Railway, which is when the second photograph was taken.

post-7733-0-53768200-1538422346_thumb.jpg
My Friend asked me if I could scratch build him the rebuilt version.

Apart from these two photographs there was a third, of an original contractors engine, taken showing the RH side which has proved useful. Note the rivet pattern on the tank and the lack of mudguards.

post-7733-0-02503500-1538422375_thumb.jpg
There were some line drawings (sketches) done by modelers in the past but none of them quite matched the photographs and apart from some basic dimensions, wheel size and base quoted in books, it would need quite a bit of conjecture to draw it up to build a model. This was where a good friend who is a bit of a whizz on CAD came to my rescue. After many hours pouring over the pictures, and the available sketches, we managed to produce an etching tool.

Here is the test etch being built. The original was built with a wooden chassis which is why we have designed the kit chassis as a box section.

post-7733-0-05274100-1538422401_thumb.jpg

post-7733-0-26991200-1538422429_thumb.jpg
Sandy

post-7733-0-63971100-1538422317_thumb.jpg

post-7733-0-53768200-1538422346_thumb.jpg

post-7733-0-02503500-1538422375_thumb.jpg

post-7733-0-05274100-1538422401_thumb.jpg

post-7733-0-26991200-1538422429_thumb.jpg

Edited by Sandy Harper
  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Some great work there Sandy and just by coincidence I was viewing this photo on an industrial site I follow.

It's a Sentinel steam wagon conversion to a 2 ft gauge Mallet.

post-1159-0-90129000-1538428825.jpg

 

I thought it looked a stunner too.

Edited by Barnaby
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

The castings for the cylinders, slidebars and cross heads arrived a couple of days ago. Unfortunately we found that our design for the motion support bracket was way off the mark and needs to be redrawn. If fact the experience of  building this test etch has thrown up a lot of anomalies and the drawing is being suitably amended as they are discovered.

It is not unexpected as we are trying to produce a kit from 4 grainy photographs, three line drawings, of dodgy provenance, and a sketch by Ian Rice.

I don't think we have done too bad for a first attempt!

 

 

post-7733-0-87731600-1538925140_thumb.jpg

 

post-7733-0-43937700-1538925822_thumb.jpg

 

Sandy

  • Like 12
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sandy,

 

Well done for getting this far, given the lack of available information.

 

Two observations, though - this is the first time I have ever come across an instance where the connecting rod was behind the slidebars, ie offset from the crosshead. The accepted practice, more or less from the point at which Stephenson created the Rocket, was for the connecting rod and piston rod to be in line, as it avoids all sorts of mechanical issues. The real problem would appear to be that the slidebars are too long by a significant amount. Looking at your photographs, the rear ends of the bars, along with the support bracket, are roughly in line with, or even slightly ahead of, the edge of the wheel.

The other is that , to look at, the slidebars themselves look to be far too heavy - more worthy of a Castle than an early 0-4-0. Even against the cylinders they look severely out of proportion.

 

Jim

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...