Jump to content
 

Does anyone know what we hit?


Recommended Posts

  • RMweb Gold

Soon after Maidenhead the HST forming the 0800 Pad-Bristol hit an obstruction on the track which could be felt quite violently in the train. It took out a brake pipe causing an emergency brake application and also smashed a window towards the rear of the train. We were lucky that there were engineers on the train who repaired the broken pipe and got us to Reading where the train was taken out of service.

 

I am curious as to what we hit. The train manager suggested ballast, but I don't think ballast is in the habit of rising up and striking trains?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

I cannot answer the specific question Colin, but there is experience of ballast piercing brake pipes.

 

When the first section of TGV Est in France had been completed it was earmarked for the then next TGV high speed record attempt - 150 = 150m/second.

 

In one of the test runs prior to the attempt proper  the 5 car specially adapted TGV kicked up a piece of ballast which cut into the brake pipe at around 500kph.  The stopping distance is something I relate to folk who seem to think trains stop on a sixpence in an emergency.  At 500kph=/- the stopping distance was 15kilometres at full emergency braking.

Edited by Andy Hayter
Link to post
Share on other sites

If the ballast is left piled above the level of the rails in the 4' after relaying work trains can hit it. Or if left high in the cess it can shake down under the vibration of passing trains until it gets on the rail head. Where it goes next is any bodies guess but it will probably be at a very high speed.

 

Once had a job where we stored the sleepers from the road we were reballasting in the 4' of the other road. We had failed to take account of a scattering of ballast on the sleepers, and the loco of the first spoil train started pushing the sleepers down the track I think with its fuel tanks. Que some urgent French Army gestures followed by a set back, and a bit of sleeper shuffling.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

When the first section of TGV Est in France had been completed it was earmarked for the then next TGV high speed record attempt - 150 = 150m/second.

 

In one of the test runs prior to the attempt proper  the 5 car specially adapted TGV kicked up a piece of ballast which cut into the brake pipe at around 500kph.  The stopping distance is something I relate to folk who seem to think trains stop on a sixpence in an emergency.  At 500kph=/- the stopping distance was 15kilometres at full emergency braking.

 

This seems an extraordinary distance ? 15 km is over 9 miles.

 

As a comparison, an aircraft landing at 200 mph certainly doesn't need miles and miles of runway to come to a halt.

 

Now obviously momentum has something to do with it, but 15km seems excessive ??

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 miles to stop does sound a very long way doesn't it?

500kmh is about 310mph. Slowing by 100mph is putting a huge amount of energy into the braking system, but even when you're done with that, the train is still moving at 210mph, which is over 3 miles per minute. If this takes 1 minute (is that reasonable?), then the average speed during this deceleration is about 260mph, in which time the train has travelled well over 4 miles. That is half the 9 miles gone.

 

Stopping from a higher speed within existing braking distances was a significant, but often overlooked, design challenge of the APT project.

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1mlov

 

 

This was the actual record breaking run, so going a bit faster than when the accident occurred, but I think you might begin to see why the stopping distance is so long.  The video is very short and for most of it there is just empty track.

 

Incidentally the landing speed of passenger aircraft is usually well below 200mph.  Even a heavy jumbo jet lands at around 160mph.  

Edited by Andy Hayter
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Distance to stop is v2/2a where v is the speed in m/s and a is the acceleration (deceleration), 0.9m/s2 being typical for a service brake on a modern unit.  From 150m/s this gives 12.5km.  However the record run may have braked more gently, perhaps using regenerative braking only, so as to reduce the heat dissipation in the friction brakes. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Er, that plays a video called "2 filles 1 carrotte" - I don't think that is the link you meant to post!  NSFW, though I believe (I closed the tab pretty smartish!) not nearly as rude as it might at first appear (which I think is given away by the title, assuming you understand enough French).

Edited by ejstubbs
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Gold

Er, that plays a video called "2 filles 1 carrotte" - I don't think that is the link you meant to post!  NSFW, though I believe (I closed the tab pretty smartish!) not nearly as rude as it might at first appear (which I think is given away by the title, assuming you understand enough French).

 

I think that must be one of those kitchens that feature in Gordon Ramsay's programmes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Er, that plays a video called "2 filles 1 carrotte" - I don't think that is the link you meant to post!  NSFW, though I believe (I closed the tab pretty smartish!) not nearly as rude as it might at first appear (which I think is given away by the title, assuming you understand enough French).

 

Ooops

 

Now corrected with the right link

 

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1mlov

Link to post
Share on other sites

Er, that plays a video called "2 filles 1 carrotte" - I don't think that is the link you meant to post! NSFW, though I believe (I closed the tab pretty smartish!) not nearly as rude as it might at first appear (which I think is given away by the title, assuming you understand enough French).

The vegan version of deux filles et un sausicon

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

I agree the quality of my link is poor, but somehow it seems to me to convey the real speed in a way that side on and head on shots do not.  Nor really do the through the cab window shots.  The passing catenary mast go faster and faster for sure, but really taking in the real speed is more of a challenge.

Everyone will have their own favourites. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

As thoroughly impressive as that is, I still prefer the 1955 version, featuring CC7107 and BB9004...

331klicks/hour ain't bad at all.

Also remember that those old girls were running on plain bearings too, albeit of the absolutely superb Athermos design.

 

There's a bit of stuff on YT about it, can't recall the channel but the narration is definitely the Gallic version of Mr Chomley-Warner!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Remember reading about those attempts - one of the limiting factors being the pantograph heads glowing red hot with sparks and molten metal flying off!

Were those done on 1500V DC or 25kV AC?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1500 DC I think, given the lovely arched portals down south, as depicted in the vids.

Confirmed; the line used was the one from Bordeaux towards the Spanish border, I believe. The track took a pounding as well.

Apparently, to supplement the train brakes, technicians on board were instructed to open all drop-lights on the coaches to increase drag.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...