Jump to content
 

Bachmann Desiro's


smg201
 Share

Recommended Posts

All this excitement about the WEST COAST based multiple units, whilst those of us on the east don't have anything RTR, and there are a lot more options available:-

 

313 / 314 / 315, 317 / 318, 319 (a large class both north and south of the Thames) 320 / 321 / 322, and the 365's

 

So Hornby, Bachmann, Heljan, Dapol - and all you commisioning retailers, five possibilities for you.

 

And you also have the newer classes like the 333's and the Heathrow sets.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

All this excitement about the WEST COAST based multiple units, whilst those of us on the east don't have anything RTR, and there are a lot more options available:-

 

313 / 314 / 315, 317 / 318, 319 (a large class both north and south of the Thames) 320 / 321 / 322, and the 365's

 

So Hornby, Bachmann, Heljan, Dapol - and all you commisioning retailers, five possibilities for you.

 

And you also have the newer classes like the 333's and the Heathrow sets.

 

It is far from perfect, I know, but give them a chance! ANY AC EMU in rtr form is a triumph over the Kettle and diseasal - a - holic norm and should be praised and encouraged as much as possible.

 

If we don't, then there might not be any others.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

A 321 would have wider interest as the similar bodyshells were used on LM, GER, WYPTE, Stansted Express, and as 3 car units in Scotland. OK, there were bodyside window differences between the first batch of GE Class 321s and the later LM based versions, but I'm sure Bachmann would be able to work something out. They might even be able to work out a way to use the same mouldings with different front ends for a 319.

 

The livery options would be enormous and ought to generate quite a bit of interest and sales I would have thought.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

The livery options would be enormous and ought to generate quite a bit of interest and sales I would have thought.

This is the real question. With no OEMUs on the market yet, the demand is unknown. After years of saying that EMUs would not sell well, Bachmann finally took the plunge with the 4-CEP. The results clearly convinced them the market was bigger than they thought as the 2-EPB was not far behind. Hornby also jumped on the bandwagon with the 4-VEP.

 

I suspect the same will be the case with the 350, it will be used as a litmus test for the market as a whole. The choice of the 350 is quite a good one as it has a decent number of liveries and also offers easy pickings for the 360 and 450 in the future.

 

Perhaps a success of the Desiro will prompt Hornby to look at other EMU families such as the Electrostar or Mk3 suburban units.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All this excitement about the WEST COAST based multiple units, whilst those of us on the east don't have anything RTR

 

As above, give em' a chance!

Leaving aside the rather specialised Javelin's this is the first EVER AC electric MU from a major supplier, so they have to start somewhere...if this does well then expect them to look for other possibilities, if it bombs then expect them to not bother.

 

Does the 350 really have a decent number of liveries, seriously?

 

Um, well I think really only 2 so far on the specific tooling, but potentially you can add TPX to that in the future - plus I still think it will translate into an SWT 450 fairly easily, even if the other 20m desiro's (360s for FGE/NXEA and Heathrow Connect) never appear.

 

One oft-overlooked plus is you can use the 350/1 as a DC unit too...

 

Have to say I don't think it's a bad choice, but with ALL EMUs being somewhat parochial in terms of operating area the 350 (useful anywhere between Euston and Preston? at the moment and in the future right up to Glasgow) do have a good spread.

 

If the variations between the 319/320/321/322 are coverable then I agree they might be worth a look, Interestingly Bachmann should have a rolling chassis for these already from the 150s...

 

The Mk3 MUs are already available in some form via Bratchell's custom service though...

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Mk3 MUs are already available in some form via Bratchell's custom service though...

True but Bratchell charge around £300 for an RTR 4-car unit. The 4-CEP is less than half that and I suspect they will try to keep future units around the same price point. I used to model overhead electrics in the days when the only option for MK3 EMUs were MTK kits. Bratchell's offerings (nice though they are) are not priced at a level that would tempt me. However if there were units at the price of a 4-CEP I would think again....

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The 350 is a pretty canny choice by Bachmann for a dip into the market. They are contemporary, and should appeal to a similar market to their own Voyager and the Hornby Pendolino (the "moving onwards from the trainset" market Hornby targeted with the Pendolino) so I suspect it could do quite well. It also just overlaps into the last days of loco-hauled trains on the West Coast, and although liveries are slightly restricted to two, assuming they do the logical thing and make a 450 you do have the option of a third. There again, the 4-CEP only has green, all-over blue and blue/grey and a similarly limited operating range, so it seems having a wide geographical reach and dozens of liveries to choose from doesn't seem to be as important as some of us perhaps thought.

 

Can't help thinking the "Dessie" could well become a must-have model for people prepared to risk penalty points on their modeller's licence if the pictures of the test mouldings, and the reaction to them, are anything to go by.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is looking rather good - may be very tempted by the N gauge version despite it breaking every rule I normally stick to (too modern, not nearby, not nearby where I grew up) apart from "It's my railway". I'll look dead good next to the 4CEP :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

True but Bratchell charge around £300 for an RTR 4-car unit.

 

Plus you then have to motorise it on top of that....

 

I agree with all your points, and a mainstream RTR release is sure to sell more purely by virtue that it will be out there on shop shelves and not effectively made to order, but thought it was worth pointing out that there were *some* options available already if the Mk3 based units are something that somebody is desperate for... ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • RMweb Premium

Does the 350 really have a decent number of liveries, seriously?

 

No two at most, but then Bachmanns first venture into EMUs, the CEP (in its origional condition) only had 3 and this did not afect sales. As other posters have pointed out though, the 350s do have a wide opperating range geographically and are a 'nice fit' with things like Pendalinos, Voyagers, 66s, turbostars, 153s etc all of which are avalable in RTR

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does the 350 really have a decent number of liveries, seriously?

two at most,

 

Well, 2 officially, but there were the slight livery variations and hybrids a few years back (2007ish) on the original silver/grey and blue liveried ones when the green first appeared.

 

Grey cab window surrounds with reduced yellow front end anyone?

 

 

 

I'll get me coat.

Edited by 303013
Link to post
Share on other sites

At a pinch, the 350/1 could be used on a Southern layout as they were "borrowed" for a short time. There are photos of the liveried units calling at Croydon on third rail.

 

Personally, I'm waiting for the inevitable class 450 to follow. While Bachmann have not announced any such intention, I think it is a certainty. We just don't know when it will be produced.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have often wondered over the years, given that EMUs / DMUs are the common face of the modern railway, if this will ever be reflected in the modelling world, particularly in terms of R-T-R product. Bachmann's recent efforts are encouraging in this respect and it appears that the 350s will represent another significant sign of what we may expect in the future both in terms of a quality (and affordable) product and with regard to potential subject matter. The recent posts on this thread make for interesting reading. Thought provoking one might say. I hope I'm not too far off topic but bearing in mind that we can't expect everything at once, does anyone feel that there are some subjects that would usually be seen to tick all the right boxes for a viable R-T-R offering but have possibly missed the boat. Units that once would have been considered a must have for the modern image/D&E modeller but now are neither "new enough" or truly "Heritage". I'm not thinking of anything specific (OK, maybe I am) but just a general thought about the "state of the union".

RP

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Bachmann should be commended for producing both the slam-door EMUs and the more modern Desiros, and I hope it's the start of a bigger expansion to include both classic and contemporary overhead units and third-rail stock. I'm keeping my fingers crossed the model will be critically-acclaimed and of the same standard as the 4CEP or higher.

 

How do we think sales will compare between the blue-grey and London Midland liveries? I personally found the Silverlink-Central "shared user" blue-grey livery bland, and much prefer the detail of London Midland. However, I realise that by producing the blue-grey version first Bachmann are appealing to modellers who might also own Central units, Virgin Pendolinos and 87s etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

These models look great on the (few) pre-production photos - I just hope they don't fill a coach with metal as they did on the Class 150. If they can get an underfloor motor into 'N' gauge models there's no excuse with '00'!

 

There seems to be a common misconception that a manufacturer can simply 'modify the tooling' to produce a different model. I'm no manufacturing expert, but I imagine that in practice this would cost almost as much as making a new mould from scratch. Thinking about it, there are still design costs (modifying the CAD drawings to represent the different model), tooling costs (a new mould would need to be made for the different model, and I believe this bit is particularly expensive) and manufacturing set-up costs (i.e. a production line to apply different liveries and details to the different model).

 

Personally I would love to see the Class 185 modelled, but I'm not holding my breath because bogies and basic body profile aside they are completely different from the 350. On the plus side, I'm sure it will only be a matter of time before someone will be posting photos on here showing their conversion from a 350 to a 185, 450, etc. :)

 

Cheers,

 

Will

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...