JWB Posted April 17, 2013 Share Posted April 17, 2013 Here are some photos of the new Bachmann Hi-Rail truck. It has working head and tail lights and DCC on board. While it has weight, and the highway wheels are metal and flanged, along with the hi-rail wheels set up for power, it's still sensitive to dirty track. I found cleaning the wheels with a cotton swap dipped in lacquer thinner helped. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glorious NSE Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 That looks like it has potential, it's not a bad looking vehicle except for the narrow track wheels - wonder if you could add 'dummy' road wheels outside them? Hmmm! 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
69843 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 (edited) Be a problem if you drove that on the road. Local Council would love fixing roads with 1,435mm (or 16.5mm) gaps in them. I'd be tempted to replace the 'road' wheels with a set of proper wheels to sit on the track, then add a bit of weight so that they get traction, and make the rail 'guide' wheels actually work as rail wheels, assuming they don't do much at present. That's actually gotten me thinking... EDIT: Just noticed the ABSOLUTLY CORRECT graffiti on the wall! Edited April 18, 2013 by 69843 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trisonic Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 A couple of detailed shots of a real one: Best, Pete. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glorious NSE Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 I'd be tempted to replace the 'road' wheels with a set of proper wheels to sit on the track, then add a bit of weight so that they get traction, and make the rail 'guide' wheels actually work as rail wheels, assuming they don't do much at present. But at present the 'road' wheels are both the drive and the electrical pickup (a guess, but logical from the look of them, else they wouldn't be so compromised) - so *replacing* them means you now have something that doesn't work - hence the idea of putting dummy 'rubber' road wheels outboard of the (functional but fictional) ones it has...it's a larger/heavier (prototype) vehicle than the one Pete shows, so its not unreasonable for it to have a wider wheel track - as it is it looks a little strange with a huge overhang on the wheel arches! (I also like the graffiti!) 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
69843 Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 But at present the 'road' wheels are both the drive and the electrical pickup (a guess, but logical from the look of them, else they wouldn't be so compromised) - so *replacing* them means you now have something that doesn't work - hence the idea of putting dummy 'rubber' road wheels outboard of the (functional but fictional) ones it has...it's a larger/heavier (prototype) vehicle than the one Pete shows, so its not unreasonable for it to have a wider wheel track - as it is it looks a little strange with a huge overhang on the wheel arches! (I also like the graffiti!) That is a good point. I'll pop my head back down now... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adrian Wintle Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 (edited) Hi-rail trucks do tend to look a little strange due to the slightly reduced track of the wheels to match the rail width. It is conceivable that at the rear a truck like that might be a dually, but it would still be reduced in track from a normal truck. See http://www.highrailequipment.com/highrail-trucks.html for an example but this one doesn't have the wide front flares and its work box isn't anywhere near as wide as the one on the Bachmann truck. I think the issue is that they made a hi-rail chassis for a small (pickup-based) truck like the one Pete has shown, but put the body of a larger truck on it. I also think that they didn't make the road wheels wide enough, possibly to avoid running problems/shorts. Adrian Edited April 18, 2013 by Adrian Wintle Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glorious NSE Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 I still think you're looking at too small a prototype I think it's a vehicle that's this kind of size (minus the extra axle) - rather than a 'pickup truck' sized vehicle as that one and the one Pete pictured are based on: http://www.highrailequipment.com/bridge-inspection-equipment.html In fact I think this is the correct cab looking at it... http://www.highrailequipment.com/highrail-crane.html The track on those is much wider than a pickup truck... http://www.highrailequipment.com/rotary-dump-truck.html (Lots of idea's for Boley kitbashes there too! ) This GMC also seems a fair match for the cab? http://www.sterlingrail.com/classifieds/classified.php?id=1992 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWB Posted April 18, 2013 Author Share Posted April 18, 2013 These trucks are pretty much unique to the railroads that order them, and I've never been able to find one that matches any commercial model (e.g., the old Walthers/Magnuson urethane, or any Boley conversion). That goes for the new Bachmann, too, but it's basically a fun thing at the 3-foot level. Here are some shots of trucks that are sorta-kinda. I agree with the idea of adding slightly smaller-diameter wheels to the outside of the rear "highway" wheels on the model; I may do this. (I may get the UP Bachmann version, too!) 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glorious NSE Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 Liking the scruffy NS example. Any idea whether there's any spare outputs on the DCC? Is it a conventional decoder wired in or a bespoke board? I'm just thinking that adding a beacon (Like that UP one) would be a nice feature? (Sigh - I think I just added something else to my modelling 'to do' list...) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWB Posted April 18, 2013 Author Share Posted April 18, 2013 It's a board, based on the parts diagram -- I haven't disassembled it. Given Bachmann's general policy of providing minimum function to keep costs down, I suspect there are no other options with it. It does appear that there's room for detail and customization -- I'd thought of substituting a Boley cab, for instance, but then I'd have the question of what to do about the headlights, which are a plastic light rod. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adrian Wintle Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 I still think you're looking at too small a prototype I think it's a vehicle that's this kind of size (minus the extra axle) - rather than a 'pickup truck' sized vehicle as that one and the one Pete pictured are based on: http://www.highrailequipment.com/bridge-inspection-equipment.html In fact I think this is the correct cab looking at it... http://www.highrailequipment.com/highrail-crane.html The track on those is much wider than a pickup truck... http://www.highrailequipment.com/rotary-dump-truck.html (Lots of idea's for Boley kitbashes there too! ) This GMC also seems a fair match for the cab? http://www.sterlingrail.com/classifieds/classified.php?id=1992 Yes, the larger prototypes have a wider track. The front wheels are lifted clear of the rails (so width doesn't matter), while the rears are dually, with the inner tires providing the drive. Bachmann's chassis is appropriate for a smaller, pickup-based, hi-rail, not the body they have provided. Adrian 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glorious NSE Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 It's a board, based on the parts diagram -- I haven't disassembled it. Given Bachmann's general policy of providing minimum function to keep costs down, I suspect there are no other options with it. It does appear that there's room for detail and customization -- I'd thought of substituting a Boley cab, for instance, but then I'd have the question of what to do about the headlights, which are a plastic light rod. Presume the lights are switch-on-and-off-able? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWB Posted April 18, 2013 Author Share Posted April 18, 2013 Yes, function 0. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trisonic Posted April 19, 2013 Share Posted April 19, 2013 JWB, Where is the site of that Santa Fe operation in your first photo in post #9 (the one with the "Sea Foam Green" trim)!!! Thanks, Pete. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glorious NSE Posted April 19, 2013 Share Posted April 19, 2013 Is that the mountain from close encounters in the background? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trisonic Posted April 19, 2013 Share Posted April 19, 2013 I don't think so, Martyn. I've seen mesa's like that all the way from North Carolina to Arizona - I suspect it is in California but we'll see. Best, Pete. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWB Posted April 19, 2013 Author Share Posted April 19, 2013 Trinidad, CO on the north side of Raton Pass. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
trisonic Posted April 19, 2013 Share Posted April 19, 2013 Trinidad, CO! Thanks JWB, didn't think of that...... Best, Pete. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWB Posted April 20, 2013 Author Share Posted April 20, 2013 It's called Fisher's Peak, very much a local landmark. While there have been several published Raton Pass layouts, I don't remember any including Fisher's Peak on the backdrop, or at least the photographer didn't catch it. In fact, I can't remember a published Raton Pass layout that's gotten the place right. Here are some more photos of the depot and the peak. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glorious NSE Posted July 13, 2013 Share Posted July 13, 2013 With the usual US-UK time delay, I picked the one I ordered (the plain white one until I finally decide what i'm going to do with it) up from my local shop here today. First impressions are very good, runs very smoothly considering the size, helped by fairly clever and flexible 8 wheel pickup. For kitbashers the bodyshell is in 2 pieces (utility body and cab/nose) and both those are easily-kitbashed plastic. Removing the 4 larger screws under the rear part allows that to come off, the cab will then unclip. The crane is a further separate part screwed into the underside of the utility body. If you remove the rear body then the mech is completely below the line of the cab windows, so lots of scope for putting an alternative body on it as long as it's at least that height - one easy conversion might be a sperry truck? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glorious NSE Posted July 13, 2013 Share Posted July 13, 2013 Nekkid pics, for the kitbashers... Rear body removed... 'Topless' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CraigZ Posted July 13, 2013 Share Posted July 13, 2013 Have a big Mexican hi-railer that I photographed in Orizaba about 13 years ago. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWB Posted July 13, 2013 Author Share Posted July 13, 2013 (edited) A kitbash and detail possibility would be to add the angle iron framework over the cab and hood that appears on some trucks like this: On the UP truck, notice the orange traffic cones on the rear bumper. Bachmann and JLL Innovative make these, and they are very common on both railroad and ordinary commercial utility trucks. Now that I think of it, the SJVR truck has deployed its cone! Edited July 13, 2013 by JWB 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glorious NSE Posted July 25, 2013 Share Posted July 25, 2013 Spent a few hours on this one last night... I think that looks much better, it's had a bit of detail painting, a driver, some proper mirrors and a few decals added to enliven then look a bit, and then some very slight weathering. I found wheels the right size on an old Athearn piggyback trailer. The front ones are mounted on a piece of plastic and so don't revolve, the rear ones are superglued to the 'faux' wheels. Whilst it looks good I need to try again with the rear wheels, as a test run confirms I didn't get them centred properly! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now