Jump to content
 
  • entries
    15
  • comments
    73
  • views
    25,077

Automatic couplings - weighing up the cost of conversion?


RobboPetes

1,211 views

Another thing to consider when evaluating options is the cost. The more stock one owns the greater the importance of such consideration. The price of the Dapol units have been checked against the Hattons website whilst the cost of the DG couplings is via the 2mm Scale Association website.

 

I currently have 72 frieght vehicles, with at least another 8 to make up and at least another 10 to purchase. Add to this a loco fleet that currently stands at 4 units, with up to another 9 to purchase.

 

Of these, 44 frieght vehicles are runnable with another 8 to make - none of these have the NEM pocket. This would mean I would need to purchase at least 18 Packs to convert these units to NEM pockets (3 units per pack). Add to this the purchase of magnetic couplings to deal with 72 + 8 + 10 = 90 frieght vehicles and 4 + 9 = 13 locos.

 

I would need to purchase:

 

Pack for non_NEM couplings each @ £ 8.00 x 18 = £144.00;

Magnetic couplings (x 5) each @ £17.00 x 21 = £357.00

 

Total £501.00

 

OUCH!

 

 

The cost of DGs is £2.50 for 8 pairs.

 

I would need to purchase:

 

DG coupling fret (8 pairs) each @ £2.50 x 13 = £32.50.

 

Total £32.50

 

Both prices do not include the coupling magnets. The differences in the cost of these is negligible.

 

As can be seen a considerable saving can be made with the DG option. The problems I thought I was going to have fitting DGs to the Peaks was resolved in my last post thanks to a link http://neag.2mm.org.uk/2008/11/work-continues-on-my-farish-peak.html. The research I did for the telescopic hoods and the ferrywaggons confirmed these would be easier than first thought. Using the results above I will be opting for the DG coupling system.

 

The only problem with purchasing the DG couplings is the time it would take to make them up. There is a link on this site that shows a quick way to produce these. Obviously, once you have made the first few you get quicker as you make more.

 

I hope this might help others in making an informed choice between the 2 systems.

6 Comments


Recommended Comments

Hi Gary (sixteen). I agree the more you make the easier it becomes. Another useful link on here is http://www.rmweb.co.uk/community/index.php?/topic/43748-easy-dg/ I have found some handy bits on here that will help me (and others) to make better couplings in future.

 

I will fit them to most items as I like to run trains of differing lengths to suit different traffic. The nice thing about wagonload traffic is the splitting up and spotting of each/couples of wagons.

 

I have included in the calculation a rake of 16 HAAs  which I would use for a cement works, similar to Barrington cement works near Cambridge. For the real train they used wagons in cuts of 10 to be loaded at Kings Lynn docks before the onward journey to Barrington. For my purposes I would use wagons in cuts of 8, with only the outer wagons converted to DG.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium

As far as I'm concerned DGs are a no-brainer. I've been using them for 25 years and they are economical and pretty much faultless in operation. Don't forget to blacken them before assembly as they can be a b****r to do afterwards. Don't consider painting them as the surfaces have to be smooth for everything to work properly.

 

David

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Thanks David, you're right about the no brainer. I WILL have to blacken them first, but I have stuck some to my wagons already...patience please!!! Yes, I should be more patient!

Link to comment

You don't have to convert everything at once. Have a few wagons with one type of coupling at each end until you have converted all of them over. At least then you will still be able to run all of your rolling stock, even if you have to have a match-truck in between.

 

There is precedence for this too, though not in England. The Standard-gauge New South Wales Government Railways went on a program of converting from 3-link hook drawgear to automatic couplings that ended up taking some 40 years. There were vehicles with hook drawgear and buffers, vehicles with automatic couplings and buffers and then other with automatic couplings and no buffers. It was possible to couple a vehicle with buffers and automatic couplings to another with hook draw gear and buffers using a "transition link" (a D-shackle with a couple of links which would attack to the automatic coupling) I have a photo somewhere of a locomotive hauling 3 trucks and a carriage and two of the trucks were there to act as match-trucks!

  • Like 1
Link to comment

I agree with you Harleymartin.

 

I plan to do what your saying by converting the outer vehicles to start, then modifying the rest as time allows. I will work on particular trains to start with (2 x ferrywaggons, 6 x SPAs, 2 x VGAs). I will still be able to run mixed trains as I wish. Eventually, I plan on having all wagons done in a relatively short time.

 

I did the same thing in 4mm several years ago when I was converting my stock to screw/instanter couplings. I remember one day on the local club layout before an exhibition, a mate and I double-headed our Airfix class 31s (now, there's a blast from the past!) with a converter coach making an 11-coach train and got it running a scale 55 mph. We were well impressed! We then set this up as one of the trains for the days showing.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...