Jump to content
 
  • entries
    79
  • comments
    172
  • views
    41,157

Status Report before a Hiatus


Focalplane

1,478 views

blog-0272360001431251288.jpgShipston and I are about to part company for about three weeks and I have already promised some photos of the progress so far. But first, the report.

 

The baseboard modules have gone together well and appear to be stable.

 

Track building is 90% complete and about 70% laid. About 50% of the track is live. No point motors have been installed, however.

 

Tests of the module connections appear to be good, see the previous post with video. http://www.rmweb.co.uk/community/index.php?/blog/1581/entry-16037-first-loco-test-with-video/

 

SteveNCB7754's buildings are looking good, particularly those that have been let in to the surface of the modules. Track has been laid in the goods shed. The station and platform will be needing some attention when I return but all the other buildings are ready to install with lighting, etc.

 

I have done a small test of the ballast mix to be used.

 

I have started to construct the end loading dock which will need fencing and a five bar gate.

 

Comparisons with old photos show that I have captured the general spaciousness of the layout though there has been significant foreshortening. Even so, the run round loop is longer than need be. At 9 feet long and 2 feet wide, the scenic section should not give the impression of being squashed in to a restricted space. This has always been my intent.

 

The liberty I have taken in expanding Shipston's services in the mid-1930s means that it will no longer be a single locomotive line but will be operated by the GWR with visiting rights afforded to the LMS via a fictitious line to Ettington Station on the S&MJR. The junction to Ettington will be just off scene and will be controlled by the station signal box. Yes, there will be a signal box in place of the two original ground frames. Tokens will be required, one for Moreton-in-Marsh, one for Ettington. And, there will be signals!

 

Operations should be interesting. With no turning facilities the tender engines (Midland 3F, Earl 4-4-0) will run backwards to Ettington. Freight transfer will be important with no through freights (or passenger services) running direct from Ettington to Moreton and vice versa.

 

The fiddle yard will have only three sidings, using a Peco 75 three way switch, but will have additional space for rolling stock as it is 40cm wide.

 

Now for the photos:

 

The first two are street level shots from the SW corner of the yard with the coal siding to the left and the station platform on the right. The test of the ballast mix is at the end of the coal siding:

 

blogentry-20733-0-61155000-1431250944_thumb.jpg

 

blogentry-20733-0-09709300-1431250957_thumb.jpg

 

The third photo is a general aerial view of the station from the north. As always, the black painted corrugated goods shed dominates the scene. This is a magnificent structure by SteveNCB7754 and has a lot of interior detail including a crane.

 

blogentry-20733-0-65268800-1431250970_thumb.jpg

 

Another view from the same position but showing the cattle pens.

 

blogentry-20733-0-11521900-1431250982_thumb.jpg

 

And finally, the third module with incomplete track and the engine shed placed on top of the module.

 

blogentry-20733-0-35231200-1431250995_thumb.jpg

  • Like 7

5 Comments


Recommended Comments

That's looking very good now Paul!

 

As you say, the goods shed is fairly dominant -  I only got to see the station/platform let-into the surface of my layout board (before pulling the plug on the project), so its good to see the goods shed in its true proportion.

 

Still going to use the original water tower, or does your new scenario demand somthing a little bigger now, or is 'off-scene'?  The original (round and flat-topped), was slightly smaller than standard and only had to service the very infrequent branch loco (Dean Goods).  The traffic volumes you are postulating, would presumably need a bigger supply.

 

Also just spotted your GWR horse box, which reminds me I was told locally, that the rest of that level area and then slope adjacent to the rail by the cattle dock, was where horses were loaded/unloaded from those wagons.  Probably a well known fact to most (but I didn't) and seems obvious now, but I thought I'd mention it anyway.

 

 

EDIT: Water Tower and Horse box unloading.

Link to comment

Thanks, Steve.  Your excellent work is already the centerpiece!

 

Yes, I will use the water tower even though it may be on the small size.  The reason is that the water quality at Shipston was considered by the GWR to be poor so water from the well was only to be used in an emergency.  the extra siding (which I am not building but which will be ghosted in as abandoned) next to the engine shed was for a tender of good quality water brought from Moreton.  The Shipston well water was, of course, quite suitable for washing down the cattle pens and ash pit.  Ash pit?  There wasn't one, but I feel that there should now be one, so it will go in front of the engine shed (the inspection pit inside the shed being used for all other maintenance issues).

 

Back to the water supply, all Moreton trains will have to provide their own water for the return journey.  The Ettington traffic will have first call on the Shipston water supply!

 

Good news about the horse box, but the space between the cattle pens and the good shed had a 40 foot coach body and a van on blocks (both of which I have suitable kits for).  So where did the horses load/unload exactly?  I could have them unloading through the cattle dock.

Link to comment

Paul,

Sorry, for some reason, I do not seem be getting notification of your replies any more.

 

Horse loading/unloading -  I probably did not explain myself very well.  This was carried out on that flat area at the top of the slope to the right of the livestock ramp leading to the cattle pens.  In other words, if your GWR horse box were just a few scale feet nearer the cattle dock (in the last picture above), it would be in exactly the right place.

 

That area does not look very big, but such valuable animals would presumably have been ridden to the station for transportation, or have drawn the owner's personal carriage there, prior to that vehicle being separately loaded into a covered carriage truck ('Python'?) or onto a well-type wagon ('Hydra'?).  Either way, the area required to load each animal singly into the horse box wagon, does not need to be that large.

 

HTH

Steve

Link to comment

Steve

 

Thanks for the above explanation - yes there is room!  Like you I don't seem to be getting any notifications.  I am back in France now but busy with other things for the time being that are not Shipston related.  My priority from SWMBO is to fit the fascia, etc. as we have family staying here in 6 weeks time.

 

The horse box will add more operational interest to the layout and I am sure there are other subjects that can be added to enhance the operational aspect of the layout beyond coal, animals and raw timber for the local saw mill (raw in, pit props out according to my research).  I need a GWR bogie bolster for the raw timber but they are not available at the moment.

 

Paul

Link to comment

Paul,

 

Sorry (again!), have only just come across your new repy by chance.  So this is the second time I have had to click 'Follow This Thread' -  hope it 'sticks' this time.

 

If only someone hadn't built a gasworks nearby, you could have had the 'Cordon' gas tank wagon traffic as well (LOL).  On the subject of goods traffic (and research); if you need any information on that score, I still have all my research notes, which I could knock into some sort of order and post here, if required.

 

Steve

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...