Jump to content
 

Tidying up a Fleischmann BR 86 (H0)


readingtype

416 views

One thing always leads to another.

 

I decided long ago that my H0 locos would get replacement Originalbügelkupplungen (OBK) couplings. Here after work over the last few days is the front of my Fleischmann BR 86. For sure there is a still dirty great hook but the NEM pocket is gone, it's far more subtle than anything the industry could provide and to my mind the incorporation of the scale coupling hook and turnbuckle is very neat.

 

It's got lovely wheels made and fitted by Holger Gräler (Germany's go-to engineer for replacement H0 wheels) and I doubt any of my modifications will really live up to them. However, the OBK in the buffer beam is a massive step up from the NEM coupling that was sticking way out before.

 

Catch is, the guard irons (Schienenraümer) were cleverly incorporated into the coupler mechanism -- they swung side to side as the coupling moved. Once exposed by removing the coupler, the whole thing looked dreadfully crude and was in the way of the OBK, so it's gone. Same at the back. And so now there is a rather glaring absence below the buffer beam.

 

And that means I now need to create new guard irons front and rear.

BR_86_OBK_IMG_20191216_001137.jpg

  • Like 2

3 Comments


Recommended Comments

  • RMweb Premium

The wheels and coupler really do make the model look very nice indeed.

 

I've never heard of an OBK coupler ... does it prevent buffer locking? It must be almost invisible from a normal viewing distance.

 

- Richard.

Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium

There is most definitely no protection against buffer locking. You need to be confident that anywhere one or both vehicles coupled with one or two of these go has curves that are not going to cause trouble. The recommendation is to use sprung buffers, but I have (probably through not having spent long enough shunting with these couplings) not yet had trouble on the (fairly short) vans fitted with unsprung ones.

 

Speaking of tight curves the photo attached shows a situation I think I have only ever previously seen on a model railway. I wonder if that explains the fact there is a partly dismantled coupling lying on the ballast. This is at ÖGEG, Lokpark Ampflwang (Austria).

buffers_IMG_5308_CR2_embedded.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium

I've worked up first versions of the front and rear guard irons in CAD, based on a copy of the general arrangement drawing in the Eisenbahn Journal special covering the BR 86, II/94 by Manfred Weisbrod and Horst J Obermayer (this can be bought online from the publishers as a digital download, or second hand from Ebay or Abebooks). The drawings looked promising enough to try out in brass. I cut and filed them from thin brass sheet. Here are some pictures showing them fitted. They need a little straightening and centring.

 

As I have drawn them, the guard irons don't line up with the cutouts for the front carrying wheels because Fleischmann made these up to allow the model to go around R1 radius curves. The real loco has bar frames (like North American steam locos) that run behind the top half of the wheels. Fleischmann's creativity is rather exposed by the finer flanges of the RP25 wheels fitted now. The mudguards are higher than they should be, too. I am pondering whether I can bring these down a bit. With no footplate they're a very characteristic feature of the BR86; checking sources shows they were not part of the original design and the first locos built didn't include them.

BR86_IMG_20191223_205649.jpg

BR86_IMG_20191223_202744.jpg

BR_IMG_20191223_203346.jpg

  • Craftsmanship/clever 1
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...