Jump to content
 
  • entries
    10
  • comments
    32
  • views
    3,497

BRDatabase data accuracy


D1001

636 views

Hi,

 

I thought I would just put a blog entry for people to highlight any problems they find with www.BRDatabase.info

 

If you see an error, an omission or have ideas for how the data could better be presented, please leave a message below and I will see what I can do. I really want the resource to be as accurate and understandable as possible and I cannot do that without help - I regularly see messages saying "don't trust BRDatabase" etc... but I cannot fix everything by myself, so I would appreciate a more interactive approach to fixing problems.

 

Thanks

Edited by D1001

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Friendly/supportive 2

9 Comments


Recommended Comments

  • RMweb Gold

Thanks for all your good work. I have used the site on many occasions and found it a good resource but as with everything else try to cross-reference where possible.

 

There are some occasional date problems with shed codes. 

I noticed one today on the LT&S 4-4-2T where some were shown as allocated to 13D Northwich. 

The CLC sheds had LNER codes to 1950 when they were for a short while proposed to become 13 group. Within a few weeks this was changed to put them into existing LMS groups.

The 13 group on the LMS covered LT&S and North London sheds. When the LT&S was transferred to the ER at the start of 1950 the sheds became 33 group with being Shoeburyness changed from 13D to 33C.

It appears that the 'From' date on Northwich as 13D is incorrectly shown as being in 1935, not 1950.

 

Eric

 

 

Link to comment

I sent an email to the website sometime last year (maybe earlier) regarding the entry for GWR 6007 'King William III'. The entry states that this locomotive was in service from 03/1928 until 09/1962. The original 6007 (from lot 243) was written off in an accident on 15th January 1936 and condemned in early March of the same year. Lot 309 (03/36) was for a replacement, new build, engine carrying the same name and number. It may have included some parts from the original build in its construction but how much is not recorded. 6007 would have only been 26 years old at the time of scrapping.

 

Dave R.

Link to comment

I'm a regular user to the site and find it a fabulous resource, so I wish it well. These large endeavours are inevitably 'best efforts', and I don't suppose anyone should expect them to be perfect. Continuous improvement is the guiding principle.

 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 3
Link to comment
21 hours ago, TheSignalEngineer said:

Thanks for all your good work. I have used the site on many occasions and found it a good resource but as with everything else try to cross-reference where possible.

 

There are some occasional date problems with shed codes. 

I noticed one today on the LT&S 4-4-2T where some were shown as allocated to 13D Northwich. 

The CLC sheds had LNER codes to 1950 when they were for a short while proposed to become 13 group. Within a few weeks this was changed to put them into existing LMS groups.

The 13 group on the LMS covered LT&S and North London sheds. When the LT&S was transferred to the ER at the start of 1950 the sheds became 33 group with being Shoeburyness changed from 13D to 33C.

It appears that the 'From' date on Northwich as 13D is incorrectly shown as being in 1935, not 1950.

 

Eric

 

 

Thanks Eric, I have fixed that one now. It's always a bit of a headache with the depots that changed hands or where dual-owned/shared between companies.

Link to comment
2 hours ago, Miss Prism said:

I'm a regular user to the site and find it a fabulous resource, so I wish it well. These large endeavours are inevitably 'best efforts', and I don't suppose anyone should expect them to be perfect. Continuous improvement is the guiding principle.

 

"Continuous improvement" should be my motto but unfortunately it's "Stop tinkering, you'll only break it!"

  • Funny 2
Link to comment
3 hours ago, Devo63 said:

I sent an email to the website sometime last year (maybe earlier) regarding the entry for GWR 6007 'King William III'. The entry states that this locomotive was in service from 03/1928 until 09/1962. The original 6007 (from lot 243) was written off in an accident on 15th January 1936 and condemned in early March of the same year. Lot 309 (03/36) was for a replacement, new build, engine carrying the same name and number. It may have included some parts from the original build in its construction but how much is not recorded. 6007 would have only been 26 years old at the time of scrapping.

 

Dave R.

Thanks Dave - I have added the new loco - this has been on my list for ages!

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold
1 hour ago, D1001 said:

Thanks Eric, I have fixed that one now. It's always a bit of a headache with the depots that changed hands or where dual-owned/shared between companies.

I think there's still a glitch in Northwich or Shoeburyness somewhere as the LT&S Class 79 tanks are still showing some at Northwich and the dates between the tables at the top and bottom of the shed page don't match up.

The information on Northwich seems very fuzzy as the other sites I have looked at don't always give definite dates. I wonder if anyone from the 8E Railway Association has any information?

Edited by TheSignalEngineer
Link to comment
10 minutes ago, TheSignalEngineer said:

I think there's still a glitch in Northwich or Shoeburyness somewhere as the LT&S Class 79 tanks are still showing some at Northwich and the dates between the tables at the top and bottom of the shed page don't match up.

The information on Northwich seems very fuzzy as the other sites I have looked at don't always give definite dates. I wonder if anyone from the 8E Railway Association has any information?

 

OK - got that - I use cache files to reduce the load on the database and when something changes, I need to delete the cache files so they can be refreshed. Guess what I forgot to do!

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...