Jump to content

Some CR ballast wagons.


Dave John

641 views

 Share

As I mentioned in the last blog I have been building some CR ballast wagons.

 

These were built using my usual methods, styrene bodies, copperclad sub chassis to take the W irons. The outer pair are from the 1890 drawing, the middle one is a pre-diagram version from the photo. The drawing makes no mention of canvass covers for the axleboxes and without a reference photo I can’t tell whether they were so fitted. I added them to the pre -diagram wagon which did have them. I suppose if a photo ever comes up I can add them to the other two.

 

What is significant from my point of view is that they are painted with acrylic paints. A bit of a learning curve involved but I think I am reasonably convinced by the result. Comments welcome.

 

1044787135_CRbw1.thumb.JPG.5e494518d547d26a467e77bcb9f0f598.JPG

 

 

 

1625059755_CRbw2.thumb.JPG.7b8c257541caa606509702ec27c4a5e5.JPG

 

 

A couple of snaps of a short pway train. The ballast plough is a kitbash, bits of the cambrian kit combined with new sides and  ends.

 

478951804_crbw3.thumb.JPG.d7068cc5ec201207207a8ce59fbb1117.JPG

 

 

1565159007_CRb44.thumb.JPG.f1409d6ac1514e36a95bdccbe8681042.JPG

 

 

 

 

I have a few other projects which might be occupying the bench for a while. Might even generate a separate blog for one of them .

  • Like 21
  • Craftsmanship/clever 5
  • Round of applause 2
 Share

13 Comments


Recommended Comments

  • RMweb Premium

I don't believe I've seen a primary source reference to the axlebox-protecting flaps being made of canvas. I've wondered whether they could be leather, having seen wear holes in some. But different railways may have used different materials.

 

The ballast plough brake you say is bashed from a Cambrian kit - for the Shark, I presume. are the overall dimensions a good match?

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment

I think some did use leather Compound. The Caley ones do look to me like a heavy tarpaulin style material, but thats just my eye. 

 

image.png.2cbcb2eefae15409704633c522d5fe54.png

 

 

Just had another look at the Ballast plough. The only bits from the kit I used were the ploughs, roof, internal partitions and lifting gear. The rest is in styrene, pre silhouette days. I seem to remember that getting all the letraset lined up was a nightmare. Dates it a bit. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Informative/Useful 2
Link to comment

The painting looks good. I've been using Tamiya myself for a while with good results

 

Intrigued by the ballast-plough and would be interested in a blog post

  • Agree 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment

There's an interesting photie of a ballast train at Dunblane on page 268 of the wagon book. All of the wagons have canvas covers on the axle boxes, but they look heart-shaped or shield-shaped and a touch stiffer than your photie above

  • Agree 1
Link to comment

Aye , the wagons in that Dunblane train almost look as if they have wooden wings over the axleboxes.  Strange, and perhaps they are ex SC rather than Caley. 

 

Here is a photo of the ballast plough. Made about 15 years back, Basically scribed styrene with 10 thou slaters rod in a groove to look like the half round beading. A bit rough, but ok from a passing glimpse. The footboard has distorted a bit and it could do with a number plate. 

 

241315540_ballastplough1.thumb.JPG.eb3808775f1c0c3b1785b111ef393069.JPG

 

 

 

  • Like 7
  • Craftsmanship/clever 3
Link to comment
Quote

they are painted with acrylic paints

 

Are they painted by air brush or by hairy brush?

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment

Hand brushed over Halfords rattle can primer Krusty. 

 

I make the body then a give it a clean and quick prime , shows up errors well and then apply archers rivets. Then another flick over with the primer and the red lead painted on. For that I mixed Deck Linoleum brown , Red and Flesh.  Then the transfers on and sealed , followed by the Black metalwork and weathering. 

 

Since I use etched brass W irons the wheel and axlebox assemblies can go in last, makes painting easier . 

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to comment

Sorry for the slightly OT question (I did go back to check your plans but the RMweb image massacre of 2022 has rendered them invisible) - what's your rough distance between the rear track centreline and the backscene? You've got a really effective low profile thing going on beyond the railway boundary!

Link to comment

Hi Lacathedrale, 

 

It is 130 mm at the platform end. Slightly more at the bridge and a bit less at the signal box. 

 

 

Link to comment

Thanks chum! 

 

I was flipping through an old RM and saw 'kelvinbank signal box' drawn up for scratchbuilding in card and ply and I thought, "Hey - I've seen that name somewhere before..."

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Heh, I do have a copy of that drawing, it is actually Kelvinbridge signal box. 

 

This is me playing with names. My layout has elements of both Kelvinbridge and Partick Central stations, but for space constraints I could model neither perfectly. So I compromised , I took ideas  from both and generated the imaginary name Kelvinbank. 

 

If I had an extra 10 feet I would faithfully model Partick Central but house extensions are difficult with a tenement flat . 

  • Like 2
Link to comment

Hi Dave, 

 

That makes alot of sense, I'm not very au fait with railways north of the border, to my shame. I do like the deep CR blue and have thought that it might make a nice scratchbuilding project one day, buy your layout is so closely linked with the CR that I would feel quite awkward in imitation! 

 

Cheers,

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...