Jump to content
 

41. 'The difficult second wagon kit'; or, errors to avoid when building a 'OO' Peco 'Parkside' Ale Pallet wagon (ULV).


C126

1,114 views

Both surprised and pleased with the results of my pretend-ODA first kit previously, I bought a Peco 'Parkside' PC60 BR Ale Pallet Wagon.  An excuse to run something more unusual in my Southern Region goods yard, using 'Rule 1' to extend their working life into the late-1970's wagon-load network for breweries nationwide.

 

Had I the time and talent, I would write a 'missing manual', but will just offer some tips I should have noted so others, if interested, do not make the same mistakes as me, and their wagons turn out better.  I was going to post Peco's instructions, but this would probably break Copyright law, so instead will describe them.  An A4 landscape sheet, with the instructions of five paragraphs taking up a quarter of the space, on the right side are four drawings of the sprues with part nos., sole-bar (including which parts to remove), underside of wagon to show brake-gear, and side elevation showing door pattern, etc.  There is a "Historical:" paragraph giving the history and operation of the wagon plus a couple of references, and livery notes.

 

Again, not a 1970's Airfix booklet, so read everything several times and find a photograph of 'your wagon'.  Mine is to be B732383, illustrated on p.34 of Trevor Mann's excellent 'British Railways unfitted and vacuum-braked wagons in colour', Hersham : Ian Allan, 2013.  Photographed at Wigan in March 1981, and "one of the few that survived in ale traffic long enough to receive its 'ULV' Tops code".  Sadly, "ULV" is not included in the decal sheet provided with the model, only "ALE PALLET" and "RBV".  And nor is "B732383".  The mouldings are finely detailed - I am delighted with the thin end stanchions - with little flashing.  Unfortunately, the floor was distorted in all three dimensions and had to be returned to Devonshire for a replacement.

 

Only after assembly, did I notice the floor was a fraction too narrow for the ends, and I should have glued a strip of 0.5mm. plasticard along one side to make it up to width.  Stupidly, I squeezed the sides onto the floor, leaving gaps at the wagon ends (see top right corner below).  Let this be the first lesson.

 

1563937100_DSCN0312EDIT.thumb.jpg.0324a2f88757fab3b786e87d7c5c450a.jpg

 

 

Second lesson: the floor is not symmetrical.  Again, only after assembly did I realise one needs to align the sides' door pattern with the floor side abutting the brake cylinder - marked 'X' above on the moulding - and the sole-bars (again not identical).  To avoid further mistakes, I dabbed some correction-fluid to mark the end with the 'single door' on the floor and sole-bars:

 

DSCN0313.thumb.JPG.39348922df813493c40299052a1d2fbd.JPG

 

 

Now having four sides and a floor, I ignored Lesson 3 ('The Eternal'), 'Read the Instructions!'  Not knowing my 'Sprungs' from my 'Oleos', I used both buffer-beams from the same sprue, thinking they are identical, and it is the buffer that varies.  It is not.  Check your chosen photograph of the real thing.  Two (duplicate) black sprues of parts are supplied, but each has only one type of buffer-beam.

 

The sole-bars were trimmed of flash and adjusted (removing a bracket on one side), and the brass bearing cups pushed in easily.  Like the ODA, I did not bother securing them with more glue, lest it foul something.  Here one learns the floor is not symmetrical, but has an off-set vacuum cylinder on one side, so check your sole-bars.  I bodged a piece of plasticard as a new mount for the brake-cylinder on the opposite side, and hope I have got away with it:

 

DSCN0314A.thumb.JPG.dc992b82d2999e3d36bbef6265155a2d.JPG

 

 

I put the axle-boxes over the bearing cups before gluing the sole-bars on.  One then can use maximum pressure to secure them, rather than crushing a wagon in one's fingers, and I did not glue them as well.  Do check your photograph to ensure you have the correct sort.  The wheels were inserted and ran without wobbling: my major fear.  The brake-shoe assemblies had a piece of floor to be attached to, and in line with the 'OO' wheels, so all went well there.

 

Some of the brake-gear is very fragile.  I have mended mine a couple of times, not helped by my lack of dexterity and shaky hands, and suggest adding it last after painting.  The buffers just push into the buffer-beams, and I added a pair of old Bachmann couplings on the mounts after the coupling hooks.

 

Humbrol 'Liquid Poly' was used to glue parts, and I have still not learned 'less is more'.  The damage to the nearest end, where an excess leached onto my finger and melted part of the side moulding, can be discerned in the photograph below.

 

DSCN0332.thumb.JPG.3c26de07e094d5685567fea25e608b0c.JPG

 

 

Paints used were Humbrol no. 70 (Matt) - a guess for the faded Bauxite - and the new panel Precision Paints no. P129 'B.R. Freight Wagon Bauxite (Post 1964) (Matt)'.  I do not know what the interior is like, so chose a 'generic brown' - Revell no. 84 (Matt).

 

DSCN0519.thumb.JPG.e0bdd64a570f440473bae8f63e5834ad.JPG

 

 

Weathering and over-head electrification flashes need to be applied to match Mr Mann's photograph of B732383, not to mention a correct number and T.O.P.S. data panel, but until then, here is my model in 'revenue earning service':

 

606910510_DSCN0553PAN4608x1680.thumb.jpg.13ad163b19b89b5c9fbafbed8caaec54.jpg

 

 

My Dad would turn in his grave if I did not have it being loaded with Harvey's of Lewes's kegs, so please excuse the over-sized promo. steam lorry as delivery vehicle.  The only picture I have seen of a correct Harvey's vehicle is a white Foden, not produced in a die-cast range in 1:76.  Aluminium beer/ale kegs are Bachmann 44-520, supplied with excellent service by post by Morris Models of Lancing, Colletts Models of Exmouth, and the Railway Conductor of Northants.

 

I hope this will encourage others to try this kit.  However, I might have to start buying two of everything, to iron out my mistakes in the first attempt.

 

 

 

Edited by C126
Add web-page links and <Carriage returns>.

  • Like 4
  • Informative/Useful 3

12 Comments


Recommended Comments

  • RMweb Premium

I did the different axleguard each side thing on a Parkside Vanwide (IIRC) I left it like that as I can't see both sides at once ;-)

Edited by spamcan61
  • Like 1
Link to comment

Would I be right in thinking that the designers of the Parkside range in 4mm never built any of their kits?  Did they ever test them out initially before they released them into the market place on what the 'Modeller' used to call 'The Average Modeller'?   The kits certainly do not 'fall together' naturally as the Airfix wagons of yore.  I have spent enough cash on the Parkside kits on stuff that have never run.  Maybe they need a warning label 'Suitable for the modeller who wants a challenge'?  [Alisdair]

  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium

There are a number of Parkside kits that rank as the very best plastic wagon kits I have had the enjoyment of building - notably their RCH 1923 specification mineral wagons. I've no experience of their kits for what I think of as "modern" wagons; there are some of the older kits - I recall an LNER van in particular - that were less satisfactory to build but by no means beyond my skill at the time. So I find @ardbealach's sweeping condemnation unreasonable.

  • Agree 2
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to comment

Have a free 'like' for the mention of Harveys 👍  

 

Lovely wagon. I think the major issue for kits is how long lived they are - kits from the 1960's rubbing shoulders with modern (ish) kits makes a sharp contrast. Certainly the 'new old stock' Cooper Craft wagons I built that still had HD coupling types included was a bit of a shock.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

May I thank you all for taking the time to write your comments.  It is much appreciated.  I did not expect such interest, only hoping this scribbling of mine might be chanced upon over the years by those also looking for information about the kit, and stopping them making the same mistakes.

 

I was surprised by the state of the first floor supplied - and disappointed as a 'swadeshi'(?) who tries to 'Buy British' - but, bar the floor and more detailed instructions, I think the mistakes on this kit were mine, used to the 'Airfix style' of one's childhood.  The fine mouldings are a delight.  I have learned one must do more research before building such kits, their demanding a little more thought and knowledge.  Thankfully, this is readily available with the internet now, so I hope the "average modeller" can achieve good results.

 

The two kits so far have not put me off Parkside, but perhaps their earlier releases outside my interest, as my father used to say (of K's?), "are more a set of parts".  Watching him over the years wrestling with white metal, brass, and tools to get his wagons 'square and true' put me off for decades.  But having achieved two out of two thus far that do not wobble, I am getting the 'wagonner's bug'...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Whilst the Parkside range is not up to the standard of, say, five79, they are a vast improvement quality wise on what they were some 40 years on their initial release. Careful assembly pays dividends in the end with trimming and tidying mouldings helping, and as the OP says, consulting other sources.

They cover a wide and popular number of wagons, so much so that the RTR boys are starting to make inroads into them, but for value for money Parkside defeat them all round.

If you want something better than what comes out of the bag then nowadays there are plenty of aftermarket suppliers willing to lend a hand, and to this end, Peco will still supply iindividual sprues for those so inclined.

A vote for Parkside from me!

 

Mike.

  • Like 1
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

can you still get that lorry - I have some Dapol Harvey;s wagons and I am modelling Sussex too albeit in Hasting interwar.  I might have a go at making this based on blog. Well done for your humility and honesty - we have all suffered from glue on the fingers you are among friends

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold
23 minutes ago, deepfat said:

can you still get that lorry...

 

Doing a quick web-search, this is the best I could find (and too late, alas):

 

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/154958822566

 

Strangely, this is a green livery, and in a different box.  Drop me a line if you want pics of the box/ lorry in more detail.  Thanks for the kind words.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

As far as TOPS data panels are concerned, I wouldn't worry too much. 

 

In practice TOPS codes were not commonplace on wagons until the later 1970s . Of Paul Bartlett's three photos , the ULVs both have them (1982 and 1977 shots) but the ex LNER conversion is still branded simply as ALE in 1982.

 

Locomotives were renumbered from 1972-4 , the first to be done being the Class 76 / EM1 electrics because their existing numbers 26xxx were needed for Class 26. Branding of wagons limped some distance behind that, although wagons were live on TOPS from 1972-4 , as that's the point when the remaining pre-nationalisation wagons were eliminated thanks to the resulting fleet economies

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment

As an addendum, may I suggest a dirty wash over the kegs in your final photo? They seem a little bright! I'm sure a little dot of Harveys blue on them to represent the labels would go down a treat :) 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...