Jump to content
 

Edwardian mischief - Modelu & Andrew Stadden figures


Mikkel

3,355 views

I’ve been painting 4mm figures. Here are some photos and platform scenes.

 

002.jpg.46956331fb0b461c00b718574ddf8c47.jpg

 

I wanted to find a better way of holding figures during painting. Above is the good old bluetack solution, straightforward and good for spraying, but it doesn’t hold the figures very firmly during brush painting.
 

 

001.jpg.95c5f334615d3dfd5c7a9e1615ec3bfc.jpg

 

Another well-known solution is wire in the legs. Useful for mounting on the layout, but not always an option, I find. Some 4mm shoes won’t take a drill well, and on 3D printed figures the material can break.

 

 

003.jpg.5a94570502647564a7017aab7cc1d9ae.jpg

 
So I’ve been experimenting. I made some wooden blocks and fixed double-sided heavy-duty “Nano” mounting tape to them. This works reasonably well. The tape is elastic, though, so if left overnight a heavy figure may keel over.
 
 

004.jpg.8a7a5503516ff2581deef8f4bc013d09.jpg

 

So I'm now trying out “Tesa Powerbond Ultra Strong” mounting tape, which seems good so far. The tape does need replacing after 1-2 figures, and loses strength if you spill water on it. 

 

 

005.jpg.960a12f09a729b5094370ff29c29fad6.jpg


Anyway, back to the figures, starting with some Andrew Stadden ones. This is porter N. Pipkin, painted a while ago. Despite a ligelong struggle, he never did manage to grow a moustache. 

 

 

006.jpg.54b5b8962748a76c360bfdb2bab7e198.jpg

 

This is the young Maria Lobbs. She's a bit teared up, a common sight on railway platforms. All those difficult goodbyes.

 

 

007.jpg.d49e70eedf9947796d9e90f4cf4a0db6.jpg

 
I sometimes wonder if I should use more shading on the figures. The dilemma is that it looks good from a distance but can appear rather stark in close-up.

 

 

008.jpg.1fefb7a7d1ca71b050af12bb2ccbf80e.jpg

 
I think the big plus of hand sculpted figures is that they tend to have a lot of character. It can be overdone, but the Andrew Stadden range gets it just right, in my view.

 

 

009.jpg.a573131c2605bdb6174c4c3c6edd5812.jpg 

An attempt at an early GWR bus driver, made using an Andrew Stadden head transposed to a body from the spares box (unknown origin). Photos show a variety of greatcoats in use by period drivers, this one resembles a 1909 example in the Steam collection, second picture down here.

 

 

010.jpg.cd5bddd35b06a893235415c8e59331bb.jpg

 
On to the Modelu range. I’ve done a few of Alan’s railway staff in the past, but thought I’d have a go with some Edwardian passengers.

 

 

011.jpg.8de4976ad97ed663982609c05790883f.jpg

 

Free at last! If I'm not mistaken, recent Modelu figures have more supports than earlier ones. They come off easily enough.

 

 

012.jpg.d72a5170053ea00cdfe7ca0a9188fe07.jpg

 

 I’ve only just discovered that the Modelu figures don’t need priming. I was sceptical about that, but Vallejo acrylics go on well and in fact stick better than on my primed metal figures. 


 

013.jpg.00889391ae1589654de1c1e85645c156.jpg


Most figures in the hand sculpted ranges have slightly oversize heads and facial features. By contrast, laser scanned faces such as the Modelu ones are quite subtle. Prototypical, but harder to paint. Until recently I just left them blank, but on this batch I’ve tried to lightly indicate eyes and lips/moustaches.

 

 

014.jpg.19c53f0265c7a0ae17d8986b15476a15.jpg


The black band on the boaters was made from narrow masking tape. Gives a nice clean edge.
 

 

015.jpg.327b78cd11b57ed7407194a01d125fb1.jpg


I tend to go with sandy and brownish shades on my figures, to blend in with the overall colour scheme on my layouts.

 

 

016.jpg.c0aabc1a0e281ff75883157cda399f33.jpg

 

But I’ve been advised not to overdo colour coordination, so here is – somewhat grudgingly - a splash of green.

 

 

017.jpg.b801543b37589b2c1c29ede59507980f.jpg

 
In close-ups the printing pattern does show on some Modelu figures. But this is many times the actual size, and you certainly can’t see it with the naked eye.


 

018.jpg.b8ea17069f3b2d82c9df0b29d6a37093.jpg


Mrs Sanders is billed as an Edwardian figure but the bustle and skirt seem distinctly Victorian. The bustle went in and out of fashion during the 1860s-1880s but was largely gone by the 1890s. See also the useful Vintage Dancer website.

 

 

2028248516_henleyonthames.jpg.b7a769e1366d985f7571a2315a0951f7.jpg

Henley on Thames, colourized. No date. Source: Getty Images, embedding permitted. 


La belle epoque - for some at least! There's still some way to go before the platforms at Farthing can be filled with crowds like these at Henley on Thames, but below are some test shots from the bay platform. 

 

 

022.jpg.e28bb84b30c09d8b40124ae1ab12bd93.jpg


Mrs Martin and Mrs Hunter lament the moral decay among the working class.

 

 

023.jpg.8dedb7dd7b3d0694977fba4ae67206bd.jpg
  
Why, only this morning - says Mrs Hunter, hand firmly on hip – my purse was stolen in town!

 

 

024.jpg.4b8a7cb3f09b509af31789ec59b15050.jpg

 

Mrs Martin expresses her sympathy, omitting to mention that the very same purse is hidden under her corset.

 

 

025.jpg.c8654d8ae361cbc4ca1e10c2b8a633f8.jpg

 

Meanwhile, Porter N. Pipkin is on thin ice.

 

 

026.jpg.1d9dc3fc77cbca48b1afe7d516ed9ebd.jpg

 

Maria does not seem to believe his excuse for neglecting her recently. Perhaps the bit about cheese rolling was a fib too far?

 

 

027.jpg.fb22ca867217e5c57aa1846a21812060.jpg


Further along the platform, two writers from the Railway Magazine are weighing their options.

 

 

028.jpg.bfed59ceb5e0f983718938f811c72924.jpg 

The brief was to do an in-depth piece on Great Western wagon liveries. But it’s a rather hot day to be trudging around a goods yard.

 

 

029.jpg.c744e65b882ae9807b8169291a5f44f0.jpg

 
Perhaps field research isn’t really necessary. Better to have a good lunch at the Stag’s Head, then head back to London for a spot of creative writing. After all, who really cares about wagon liveries?

 

 

030.jpg.c1c7d5dc9885e50c745acc8695ef5a13.jpg

 
Meanwhile Mrs Toodle and Miss Toppit discuss the upcoming wedding of the Browns.

 

 

 032.jpg.7dfe0bddd22f8fd2748f3ee51558773b.jpg

 

They agree it will be a wonderful event and it is such a lovely young couple.

 

 

 031.jpg.f4b09270831c35d682f6b8ee18fb61a5.jpg

 

Secretly they hope it will end in scandal and despair.

 

 

 033.jpg.e441c2224297601e4de4ea3b55d4b60b.jpg

 

At this point Mrs Sanders appears in her hopelessly outdated Victorian dress, and everyone studiously ignores her. Such old-world eccentricity really won't do. We are the Edwardians, modern, efficient and sophisticated!

 

 

Edited by Mikkel

  • Like 23
  • Informative/Useful 1
  • Craftsmanship/clever 18
  • Round of applause 29

47 Comments


Recommended Comments



18 hours ago, Mikkel said:

Extract from a longer timeline

 

All I really learned from this is that we're overdue the return of the bustle to high fashion.

 

#Interesting/Thought-Provoking indeed!

  • Like 3
  • Agree 1
Link to comment

Mikkel, your figures are wonderfully done... as always!

 

(BTW, did you notice that the carriages in the photos at Henley and St. Pancras don't appear to have any lining? We know its there, somewhere, but it just doesn't seem to show up.)

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Thanks Dana, as usual the figure names are drawn from Dickens, although I can never remember who is called what so need to check to ensure continuity 😄

 

In the Henley photo, perhaps the lining was lost with colourizarion, or maybe doesn't show on the original film.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment

Some very nice figure painting, Mikkel and brought to life by your inimitable story-telling. 

 

I recall that I tackled some of the issue you mentioned about holders and magnifiers some time ago and I have now found them in a blog post from 2015  My title was "Figure Painting - First Steps" but I never seem to have taken any more steps!  Too many distractions elsewhere, as I flit from one thing to another.

 

That 'Model Craft' universal work holder that I mentioned was very good for holding figures during painting and has a comfortable wooden handle.  I also use an illuminated magnifier and agree with others that x3 is a useful strength.  My version, however, has an additional smaller area of high magnification, which is great for examining the finer details.  If that style is not available, you could perhaps add a small supplementary lens over part of the main lens.  The combination of lenses worked well for me.

 

I'll see if I can restore the figures to that post, as they may be helpful.  It's clear that we can expect no more 'restoration' in older posts but I have been restoring images to quite a number of my posts, mainly in the Broad Gauge blog, so far.

 

Mike

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
32 minutes ago, Mikkel said:

In the Henley photo, perhaps the lining was lost with colourizarion, or maybe doesn't show on the original film. 

Whatever the reason, it's of great comfort to small-scale modellers that lining is often invisible 🙂

  • Like 1
  • Agree 3
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium

Excellent characters @Mikkel although I am also not sure my Henley-on-Thames platforms will ever be that busy. 😎
 

I think the Henley photo was from the Regatta shortly after the canopy was built in 1904.

Edited by Neal Ball
  • Like 2
  • Informative/Useful 3
Link to comment
On 06/08/2022 at 13:59, Schooner said:

All I really learned from this is that we're overdue the return of the bustle to high fashion.

except now the same effect is achieved with implants...

  • Like 2
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  • Funny 1
Link to comment
1 hour ago, JimC said:

except now the same effect is achieved with implants...

 

Or more often, fast food....

  • Like 2
  • Funny 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold
On 08/08/2022 at 17:59, MikeOxon said:

The combination of lenses worked well for me.

 

Thank you Mike, also for this suggestion. I was wondering about such a solution but wasn't sure if there would be distortions. But it's worth a try, working under magnifiers is one of those things that seem very disorienting at first, but becomes second nature after a while. 

 

On 08/08/2022 at 20:47, Neal Ball said:

Excellent characters @Mikkel although I am also not sure my Henley-on-Thames platforms will ever be that busy. 😎
 

I think the Henley photo was from the Regatta shortly after the canopy was built in 1904.

 

Thanks Neal, well you could do a bit of out-of period running on your layout, I would love to see a special 1904 Regatta operating sequence!

 

If you have a free evening you could add a quick little diorama showing the scene below 😁

 

929855308_Henley_Regatta_Henley-on-Thames_England_1890s(1).jpg.54be0cbf91e9707639c062df2639dc7c.jpg

Caption: Henley Regatta, Henley-on-Thames,1890s. Source: Wikipedia Commons

 

 

 

  • Like 8
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium
9 hours ago, Mikkel said:

 

Thank you Mike, also for this suggestion. I was wondering about such a solution but wasn't sure if there would be distortions. But it's worth a try, working under magnifiers is one of those things that seem very disorienting at first, but becomes second nature after a while. 

 

 

Thanks Neal, well you could do a bit of out-of period running on your layout, I would love to see a special 1904 Regatta operating sequence!

 

If you have a free evening you could add a quick little diorama showing the scene below 😁

 

929855308_Henley_Regatta_Henley-on-Thames_England_1890s(1).jpg.54be0cbf91e9707639c062df2639dc7c.jpg

Caption: Henley Regatta, Henley-on-Thames,1890s. Source: Wikipedia Commons

 

 

 


That looks very chaotic.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 4
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

It's only red on the people if you look closely, but quite an effective technique.

 

Edited by Mikkel
  • Like 4
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Excellent painting Mikkel and a useful comparison between scanned and sculpted figures.  My personal view in 7mm at least is that the two types of figures don’t mix well. The scanned figures make the sculpted ones look a bit coarse, which isn’t so apparent if only sculpted figures are used.  I’ve only used Andrew Stadden’s figures on Sherton, I thought they were the best available at the time, but had Edwardian scanned figures been available when I was populating my platform I’m sure I would have plumped for those.

 

BW

 

Dave 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

What an enjoyable read and love the way the last shot brings them all together.

 

Superb stuff Mikkel, not only the painting but the photography too.

 

Inspiring as ever...🙌

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold
On 14/08/2022 at 10:39, wenlock said:

Excellent painting Mikkel and a useful comparison between scanned and sculpted figures.  My personal view in 7mm at least is that the two types of figures don’t mix well. The scanned figures make the sculpted ones look a bit coarse, which isn’t so apparent if only sculpted figures are used.  I’ve only used Andrew Stadden’s figures on Sherton, I thought they were the best available at the time, but had Edwardian scanned figures been available when I was populating my platform I’m sure I would have plumped for those.

 

BW

 

Dave 

 

Thanks Dave. Yes, I agree that the figures don't mix so well if placed directly together in a group. It works better if they are kept apart e.g. along different sections of a platform or layout. I'm going to experiment a bit more with it, but the simplest solution is probably an either/or choice for each layout. BTW, I think your excellent figures on Sherton Abbas prove that sculpted figures still work.

 

21 hours ago, bcnPete said:

What an enjoyable read and love the way the last shot brings them all together.

 

Superb stuff Mikkel, not only the painting but the photography too.

 

Inspiring as ever...🙌

 

Many thanks Pete. I enjoy the figure painting, its quite amazing how different otherwise identical figures turn out, depending on the colours and techniques used. I suspect we are looking at a future where figures come pre-coloured as 3D printing develops. Not sure I'll go for it if/when that happens.

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium

It is an interesting point Mikkel. Ready made stuff has improved significantly in recent years, but I like you take pleasure from sitting down and actually making things. 

 

There are people who collect vintage models, so we might end up as another subgroup, vintage modelmakers. A strange bunch of folk who like to cut, solder, glue and paint for the visceral enjoyment of doing so rather than just for the objective of owning a model. 

 

Just a thought.

Edited by Dave John
  • Like 3
  • Agree 5
Link to comment
1 hour ago, Dave John said:

A strange bunch of folk who like to cut, solder, glue and paint for the visceral enjoyment of doing so rather than just for the objective of owning a mode

Yup, agreed, I'm one of those and I like the idea of the 'cutters, filers and solderers' sub-group. 

 

 

  • Like 3
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium
On 06/08/2022 at 13:59, Schooner said:

 

All I really learned from this is that we're overdue the return of the bustle to high fashion.

 

#Interesting/Thought-Provoking indeed!

your need  George, Harris, Jerome (always referred to as "J."), and Jerome's dog, named Montmorency to complete the scene

 

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/308/308-h/308-h.htm

  • Like 3
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Ha! I have never actually read that. It's excellent. Here's a quote for the LSWR gang: 

 

"We got to Waterloo at eleven, and asked where the eleven-five started from.  Of course nobody knew; nobody at Waterloo ever does know where a train is going to start from, or where a train when it does start is going to, or anything about it.  The porter who took our things thought it would go from number two platform, while another porter, with whom he discussed the question, had heard a rumour that it would go from number one.  The station-master, on the other hand, was convinced it would start from the local.

 

To put an end to the matter, we went upstairs, and asked the traffic superintendent, and he told us that he had just met a man, who said he had seen it at number three platform.  We went to number three platform, but the authorities there said that they rather thought that train was the Southampton express, or else the Windsor loop.  But they were sure it wasn’t the Kingston train, though why they were sure it wasn’t they couldn’t say."

 

Etc.

 

  • Like 4
  • Funny 1
Link to comment
1 hour ago, Mikkel said:

nobody at Waterloo ever does know where a train is going to start from, or where a train when it does start is going to, or anything about it

That reminds me of GK Chesterton's (I think it was) definition of a skeptic - someone who couldn't be certain that the 11 o'clock train had left the station unless he was there to see it and even then, he couldn't be certain whether it was the train leaving the station or the station leaving the train.

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Funny 2
Link to comment
18 minutes ago, kitpw said:

the train leaving the station or the station leaving the train.

 

Getting the sceptic to assume a starting position with a foot on each would settle that. There's a maritime equivalent, although that one's actually a test for water temperature...

  • Like 2
  • Funny 2
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...