Jump to content
 

1/8th Scale model of the revised layout


Well.. it's a little rough, but it's helped with a few construction ideas.

 

Scalemodelstageleft.jpg.6f5085f23b6d54afcda044f9f09a213c.jpg

Stage left

 

ScaleModelStageright.jpg.d129be859482d742fed0040af597a959.jpg

Stage right

 

ScaleModelComplete.jpg.eae7f08b661012b5e882ef7e371c1d03.jpg

Complete frontal view

 

There still needs a few of the ancillary buildings to add (sand house, lamp store, etc.) and I might add a bit more detail on the buildings (like the openings to the running shed). I can also continue to play around with the sighting of trees in the background as well as the front. The single tree in the front is to act as a viewing break. Overall though I feel it has been a worthwhile project as it gives me a good idea how it will look.

 

After looking at the model a few times, I'm beginning to think the proscenium pelmet too low. Something to reconsider when starting to build the layout, me thinks.

 

I realise that the inclusion of the shed plate on the model will be contentious to some, but in my alternative history Rospeath Lane would have been 83G. Time will tell if I'm brave enough to keep it on the finished layout.

  • Like 3
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1

4 Comments


Recommended Comments

  • RMweb Gold
bcnPete

Posted

Nice work!

 

Big fan of mock ups myself prior to starting as it helps flush out any problems which are cheaper to correct in card than timber!

 

Would be inclined to agree that proportion wise you could increase the proscenium arch a little 👍🏼

  • RMweb Premium
Keith Addenbrooke

Posted

I’ve seen a few scale models of proposed layoutsver the years, but I don’t recall one where the baseboards (etc)  were so carefully included.  As has been noted, this has flagged up whether the proscenium arch will be too low.  Could I ask if you k ow what height you plan to display the layout at - if it’s eye level the arch may not need changing (or only a bit) as you’d be looking up at it, but if it’s for showing at a lower level then yes, I’d suggest increasing the height as taller folk  may not see much layout.  A very worthwhile exercise, thanks for sharing it here, Keith.

Yan

Posted

6 hours ago, Keith Addenbrooke said:

.....Could I ask if you k ow what height you plan to display the layout at - if it’s eye level the arch may not need changing (or only a bit) as you’d be looking up at it, but if it’s for showing at a lower level then yes, I’d suggest increasing the height as taller folk  may not see much layout....                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

Thank you  for leaving the comments guys.

 

I'm thinking of around 4 ft 3 inchs  as the track bed height above floor level. The height of the arch above track bed on the 1/8 scale model is approximately 12 inches. I don't know why I made it this high as I'd created the diagram below for a previous layout and should have taken note. So the arch needs to go up at least 2 inches so that there will ba a gap of around 14 inches between the track bed and the bottom of the arch facia.

 

The cassette board end panels will be the only solid upright pieces on the model. The arch will rest on these panels at each end. My intention is to use lockable hinges on these panels so they fold down for transportation. This means they will be added at a later stage of baseboard construction so I can play around with the arch height during the building of the layout.  BoscarneJunctionBaseboardHeight.jpg.2b0e00c0a55175fbde66c78e59e507c7.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • RMweb Premium
Keith Addenbrooke

Posted

Thanks for the information - very useful.  I’d agree that a 12” aperture is a bit tight and a few more inches should help, Keith.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...