Jump to content
 

The Liverpool & Manchester Rly 'Bird' class - 2


In my previous post, I wrote a little about the early development of locomotives on the Liverpool and Manchester (L&M) railway, culminating in a series of standard engines, built ‘in house’ and called the Bird-class.

 

In the process , I realised that not all railways have generated a literature that describes every detail of their locomotives, so that it has needed considerable effort to find sufficient information to construct a model of ‘Ostrich’.

 

My main source of information was ‘The Locomotives of the Liverpool and Manchester Railway’ by Anthony Dawson. From that, I learned that the Bird-class engines were fitted with a type of gab-gear devised by William Buddicom, who was the resident engineer of the L&M at their Edge Hill works during the period 1836 – 8.

 

After some research, I found a diagram of Buddicom’s gear on the web at http://onhistoricallines.blogspot.com/2016/11/on-valves-and-gears.html   I have coloured various parts to clarify their functions.   

 

BuddicomValveGear-COL.jpg.64c6d32c470e87d821e228feb6bcf8b8.jpg
Diagram of Buddicom Valve Gear

 

Of course, a diagram of this type provides no information about the disposition of the parts across the width of the engine.

 

There is, however, one locomotive from this period of the L&M that is well-documented: ‘Lion’ was built by Todd, Kitson & Laird and delivered to the L&M in August 1838. It was withdrawn from service in 1859, when it was purchased by the Mersey Docks and Harbour Board for use as a stationary pumping engine. It was re-discovered there in 1923 and restored at the Crewe railway works, after which it took part in the centenary celebrations of the Liverpool and Manchester Railway in 1930.

 

‘Lion’ has since steamed again on a number of occasions and was used during the filming of ‘The Titfield Thunderbolt’ in 1953. In 1979, ‘Lion’ was again restored to working order in time to lead the cavalcade on the first day of the Rocket 150 celebrations at Rainhill. As a ‘celebrity’ engine, it has received far more attention than any other locomotives from that period of L&M operations.

 

Although ‘Lion’ was originally fitted with Melling’s radial gear, it was found to have been re-fitted with Buddicom’s gear at some stage of its working life. I found a detailed description and diagram of the valve gear fitted to the restored ‘Lion’ in an article published in ‘The Engineer’, Vol.150, no 3095, dated Nov.14th, 1930.

 

LionValveMotion800x600.jpg.988e515303bc9ae723f6b9a0d46a3b1d.jpg

'Lion' drawing from 'The Engineer' 1930

 

It is clear that the arrangement of the lifting links on ‘Lion’ differs from that shown in the generic drawing of Buddicom’s gear. This raises the question of how were things done on ‘Ostrich’?

 

Fortunately, the illustration of ‘Ostrich’ that I showed in my previous post includes part of the motion below the footplate. By laying the illustration from ‘The Engineer’ next to that of ‘Ostrich’, I was able to identify corresponding components from the two drawings.  I have coloured parts of these diagrams to match those used on the diagram of Buddicom’s gear, above.

 

gearcomparison800x600.jpg.9f2bc5ff2cbb3a096668f7cd96ad231e.jpg

Comparison

 

Because a lot of the motion is hidden behind the wheels and footplate of ‘Ostrich’ my interpretation has to be somewhat speculative. It does, however strongly suggest that the eccentric rods were lifted from below, as in the case of ‘Lion’, rather than as shown in the diagram of Buddicom’s gear.

 

Additional assistance for creating a model came from the ‘Resources’ section of the ‘Old Locomotive Committee (OLCO) blog’ https://lionlocomotive.org.uk/ from which I have drawn on two photographs, shown below.

 

Lionundergear.jpg.5b11b1d3c96015c15d65392ee899101a.jpg

Photos of ‘Lion’ from OLCO Resources https://lionlocomotive.org.uk/

 

Creating a 3D-Model

 

After that pre-amble, I feel I now have enough information to attempt to add the motion to my model of ‘Ostrich’.

 

I decided to start with the crank axle and the rest of the main drive train. The first item I drew was the ‘pair of spectacles’, as seen in the underside photo of ‘Lion’. Of course, I cannot be sure that ‘Ostrich’ had the same fitting but it seems to be a reasonable assumption.

 

I continued to use 'The Engineer' drawing of ‘Lion’ for several other components. Each component was extruded separately, as shown below, and then assembled together:

 


MotionComponents.jpg.cc88d76d0d6b63c0122c0e3a65b8b9fc.jpg
3D Modelled Motion Components

 

 

Now, I could place all these parts in their proper locations within my 3D model of ‘Ostrich’

 

3D-Motion-1.jpg.e0f950decde40bd1f104d4670480ffde.jpg

3D Model of ‘Ostrich’ Drive train

 

Valve Gear

 

In modelling the valve gear, I adopted the same approach as for the drive train. I started by extruding parts from the drawing of the ‘Ostrich’ valve gear, shown above. My 3D model of a pair of eccentric rods is shown below:

 

Eccentricrods.jpg.cf0879b567e49edf2e7abee3b2f21dd2.jpg
3D Modelled Eccentric Rods

 

In order to determine the arrangement of the gear across the width of the engine, I turned to the drawings and photos of ‘Lion’ for guidance.

 

Eccentricrodlocations.jpg.bff79bf8fce0dac354aae09834932b64.jpg

Locations of Eccentrics from ‘Lion’ drawing

 

Now I started a lengthy and rather slow process of working out where all the shafts and linkages should go!

 

I broke the task down into small chunks – remembering @Mikkel dictum about how to eat an elephant.

 

1st Bite: I made the cross shaft and its two curved support brackets that are visible in the side elevation of ‘Ostrich’. I then added the levers that lift the forked ends of the two eccentric rods on one side of the engine (LHS) From looking at the various photos, I could see that the lower eccentric rod rested in a forked end of its lifting link, while the upper rod was supported from one side. This difference was necessary to avoid blocking access to the gab in the down-turned forks on the eccentric rod.

 

2nd Bite: The purpose of the lifting links is to move either the forward or the reverse eccentric to engage with the rocking lever, which rotates the ‘weigh bar’. At its outer end, the weigh bar carries another lever which transfers the motion of the selected eccentric to the valve rod.

 

3rd Bite: The two eccentric rods are attached by means of straps to a pair of eccentrics mounted on the driving axles and arranged to open and close the valves as appropriate for the direction of travel.

 

4th Bite: Once I had created the ‘motion’ for the left-hand valve, I used the ‘mirror’ command in ‘Fusion’ to duplicate the motion for the right-hand valve.

 

These successive ‘bites’ are illustrated below:

 

 

ValveGear-steps.jpg.281e630d040eccf67fb1d03bbf009289.jpg

Four steps in creating my 3D model of the valve gear

(various support structures omitted for clarity.)

 

Once these steps had been completed, I restored some of the drive train components that I created earlier:

 

3D-Motion-2.jpg.a292da6dad5b12b35894cf4384a28abd.jpg

3D model of valve gear with slide bars and cross heads added

 

And so, I can now restore the various brackets that support the ‘loose ends’, to give an overall view of Ostrich’s undergear:

 

 

3D-Ostrich-gear.jpg.e487859b35cb8b5f2319c4b240e837be.jpg
My 3D model of ‘Ostrich’ undergear

 

That has been an intensive task, involving a lot of interpretation of the available drawings and making some assumptions about the relationship between ‘Ostrich’ and ‘Lion’; the latter engine being better documented.

 

3D-model_underside.jpg.e9e1eb7d3bd3753ccc3e295045bcd1e0.jpg
My 3D Model - underside view of ‘Ostrich’

 

Sadly, after all that mental effort, not much is visible from normal viewing positions– at least I know it’s there 🙂

 

3D-model_Bird-class6.jpg.e78f0709f89a08e88b4a54ac6621f16a.jpg
My 3D model of ‘Ostrich’, including the Buddicom valve gear

 

So, I have started the New Year with a model of a little-known prototype from the Liverpool and Manchester Railway. Where next, I wonder?

 

Mike

  • Like 11
  • Craftsmanship/clever 7

8 Comments


Recommended Comments

  • RMweb Gold
Mikkel

Posted

I'm not really qualified to comment on this, but more generally it always seems to me that your work is an excellent example of sound and methodological reasoning, Mike. That makes it a pleasure to read in itself.

 

I wouldn't call most early engines aesthetically pleasing, but Ostrich is an exception. Maybe it's the cute factor!

 

  • Like 2
MikeOxon

Posted

1 hour ago, Mikkel said:

it always seems to me that your work is an excellent example of sound and methodological reasoning, Mike.

That you Mikkel for your comment.  As a former research scientist, I am continually amazed by what emerges once I start on a train of thought.  This particular exploration was triggered by a comment about Mail trains by @Compound2632 on one of my earlier posts

 

He pointed out that "I'm afraid the claims for the Great Western being first in the field of various aspects of mail by rail are spurious".  I started 'digging' and found Anthony Dawson's book 'The Engines of the Liverpool and Manchester Railway', which opened my eyes to a lot of developments that pre-empted some of the claims made in books about the GWR. 

 

So, in a short space of time, one thing led to another!  I am certainly not 'qualified' in many of the topics that I write about but I do enjoy the process of finding out - I have seen it described as 'instant erudition'.  As always, I welcome comments from people who really do know about these things 🙂

  • Like 2
  • Friendly/supportive 2
  • RMweb Premium
Compound2632

Posted

2 hours ago, Mikkel said:

I wouldn't call most early engines aesthetically pleasing, but Ostrich is an exception. Maybe it's the cute factor!

 

I think it's also that the inside-cylinder 2-2-2 rather rapidly achieved a look and balance that is familiar to our eyes; it culminated in David Joy's Jenny Lind, which I think can be reasonably claimed as the definitive 'modern' engine, marking the end of the 'experimental' period.

  • Like 2
  • Agree 1
MikeOxon

Posted

40 minutes ago, Compound2632 said:

it culminated in David Joy's Jenny Lind,

I find David Joy's diary fascinating, with his vivid description of accidents (which he describes as 'spills') in those early days.  I also like his sense of humour, such as when he wrote: "First Brighton engine was called 'Jenny Lind' after the famous singer, 'Jenny Lind,' who was making a great excitement in London. I made a very highly finished drawing 1 in. to 1 ft. of
her (the engine, not Jenny), which was lithographed, and sent about.

 

Perhaps 'Jenny Lind' should be the next stop on my historical explorations...

  • Like 3
  • RMweb Premium
Compound2632

Posted

2 minutes ago, MikeOxon said:

I made a very highly finished drawing 1 in. to 1 ft. of her (the engine, not Jenny), which was lithographed, and sent about.

 

Presumably this is the lithograph:

 

1280px-Jenny_Lind_locomotive.jpg

 

Embedded link to Wikipedia Commons, source Practical Mechanics Magazine 1848.

 

The valve gear is of course Joy's own.

  • Like 3
MikeOxon

Posted

2 hours ago, Compound2632 said:

Presumably this is the lithograph:

For the sake of completeness, this is the lady:

Jenny_Lind_Magnus800x600.jpg.7a20e8092482bc2ca32ec94e2edafa83.jpg

Jenny Lind - 1862 portrait by Eduard Magnus

  • Like 3
  • RMweb Premium
Compound2632

Posted

47 minutes ago, MikeOxon said:

For the sake of completeness, this is the lady:

 

That is,  I am sure,  to a larger scale than 1" to 1'.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • RMweb Gold
ChrisN

Posted

Mike,

Fascinating as ever.

  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...