Jump to content
 
  • entries
    24
  • comments
    103
  • views
    19,173

Well!... Banff-ish layout taking a lie-down, boxfile diorama replacement for summer.


Russ (mines a pint)

773 views

Thanks for all the the suggestions and general morale helping in respect of the frustration of the last entry, I'm not giving up on 'Banff-ish' but I am putting it away for a bit. Thanks also 'scanman' for the pm I will get back to you regarding questions/suggestions pretty soon. A decent day on the first day of BST has also confirmed 'modelling time' will be taking a bit of a hit- here's what its up against...

 

blogentry-7-0-75938000-1301271306_thumb.jpg

 

blogentry-7-0-86941100-1301271367_thumb.jpg

 

The baseboard has been mended (yes I did kick it across the room :lol: - and I'm normally so mild mannered! :D ) and modified as detailed in a previous entry. Its going to go into store now for the summer. I am keeping out the buildings and trackplan/track parts and will be working on these as time permits. A trip to the real Banff is also on the cards as our summer holidays are booked in the area.

 

So the outlook is good but for the now the enjoyment has gone out of it, trying to work on it is just a chore and I don't believe that a good model could come out of just 'carrying on' in that frame of mind. It will be back though.

 

I'd started modifying two box-files for use as a 'starter project' in N gauge about a couple of years ago, when I was thinking of trying the 'Deadwater' idea again but as a code 55 peco N gauge layout with Union Mills locomotives, this never went much further forward than the 'ideas' stage, but I've dug out the boxfiles again and started adding to them:

 

 

blogentry-7-0-84928100-1301268864_thumb.jpg

 

blogentry-7-0-09170700-1301268888_thumb.jpg

 

adding timber blocks to support trackbed and gluing the boxfiles together, using the timber and the outer coating of the boxfiles.

 

blogentry-7-0-57901600-1301268914_thumb.jpg

 

blogentry-7-0-81882100-1301268940_thumb.jpg

 

A Peco large point compares roughly to an A7 real point, that apart from sleeper spacing is why it looks wrong, I believe a point with over a 1 in 6 divergence (1 ft in every 6 ft) should have a B switch (a B switch is 6 sleepers long, compared to an A switch of 4 sleepers) the A7's were therefore subsituted with B8's and heres sleepers going down onto the templot plan.

 

The 2mm S.A. sleepers are much better than you can buy in 4mm they are a 'double track width' assuming siding/loop track centres rather than plain double track, so each time you cut one you get a 'partner' which can be used somewhere else in the turnout(s)

 

the last pic shows 1 rail which has been filed up in the easitrac 1in8 crossing jig. this has also been passed through one easitrac section, beyond which there will be a level crossing so its back to copperclad.

 

Buildings for this one are quite simple, a box like timber structure on the platform, a level crossing cottage which is already sourced from kit just needs adapting, and lots of trees - a simple life! :)

5 Comments


Recommended Comments

Hi Russ,

 

Wow, Your winding me up posting photos like that, its been 7 months since my last Scottish fix , but only 5 weeks to my next. Where of too a place called Kylesku, where ever that is, but I’m sure Ben Alder knows :D, via ?.

 

 

 

 

AS for the layout, think that’s the best thing to do when you get frustrated, go for a walk and think things over. I'm watching this very closely, I still haven’t ruled 2mm out for my next adventure!

 

 

 

 

Gary

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Glad to hear the other layout is only on the back burner - the important thing is your underway and looks good so far...do you have an overall shot of it so we can see the scope of the project?...

Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Hi Russ,

 

An A-7 turnout is fine -- in fact 1:7 is the "natural" angle for an A switch.

 

Anything longer would be a bit odd though, such as A-8.

 

The problem with A switches is that they were used only in yards and sidings, not in running lines. Which is why an A switch always looks too sharp and wrong in a running line.

 

A B switch looks much more in keeping. The shortest angle you can sensibly use with a B switch is 1:6, which gives us the popular modeller's B-6 turnout. That's not a common prototype size though, it's just the shortest turnout which looks the part in a running line. B-7 or B-8 is much better if you have the room.

 

regards,

 

Martin.

Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

You might need some chairplates to match the height of the copperclad sleepering to the Easitrac?

 

 

I'll probably just add height under the sleepers, as I did on the EM track. I soldered rail direct to sleepers in 4mm scale and have to say that the lack of chairs and/or chairplates did'nt bother me visually - the main thing to me is getting away from dodgy sleeper spacing, chunky point blades (on code 55 at least) and dodgy geometry of pointwork, as Martin says the biggest points available in the Peco range are only really suitable for goods yards!

 

I got the crossing filing jig in 1:8 so its likely all points will be B8, unless I go to the expense of another jig! :D

 

...do you have an overall shot of it so we can see the scope of the project?...
... will do this and a plan for the next instalment! - but its basically a through line with single track platform and a loop for turning back from a quarry or colliery (TBC!) and a small siding, similar to what Deadwater might have become if I had extended it.
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...