Jump to content
 
  • entries
    73
  • comments
    494
  • views
    77,704

Thinking of TOU


richbrummitt

861 views

Work is ongoing on the station platform. The construction method comprising a 5mm foam board core edged with PECO brick platform mouldings seems to be working well. The ramps have been made with some creative slotting and mitres from the straight pieces to produce the desired angle for the length of slope.

 

I have also taken some time re-organising the mess in my area of the hobby room. The milling machine has been set up and tried out, although running and cutting at 20,000rpm is quite noisy.

 

What is taking considerable time without tangible results is devising a revised TOU (turnout operating unit). The Easitrac TOU is a very clever design, but did not fit with my chosen track bed of 20mm of plywood and the design I implemented, whilst working at present, is non-adjustable and will be imopssible to maintain. I need a new solution before I can progress much further scenically because there is little point in continuing without a solid basis for a model railway in the trackwork.

 

With the track laid the options are more limited. I need something that works with the loose heel switches and that can be installed from above and/or from the sides. It would be preferable to fit within the channels already routed at 2.5mm deep, 2mm below the base of the sleepering (although I could open up the area between the sleepers to produce a 4.5mm deep trench directly under the track. I also want for any tie bar to appear like the real thing. Quite a tall ask, I know.

 

I keep coming back to the idea of an angled plate shaped like the operating rod in the vertical and soldered to a moving sleeper below the baseboard. I haven't solved how this can reliably link to the loose heels because I need to allow for rotation in the joint the switch rails whilst restraining them in the longitudinal direction. Unfortunatly, until I have a complete solution, anything I do further is building on inadequate foundations.

7 Comments


Recommended Comments

I'm no expert Rich, but I've just made my first 11 turnouts operational, and with a bit of fiddling they seem to work ok. The homemade TOU was retrofitted after construction, and though your operating system would seem to be wire in tube in routed channels whereas mine uses Cobalt motors fitted below the board, I think there could be some compatibility. My switches have rightangled springy dropper wires soldered along the length of the blades; the solder joint is about 3mm long, so quite strong. The droppers drop into brass tubes attached to a slider bar, and small plastikard wedges stop them slopping about while allowing rotation within the tube. While my tubes extend through the board and attach to a tiebar below the board, it would be possible to use short tubes set in a plastic tiebar in your channel, I'm sure. In fact, with shorter tubes you won't have the problem I had to start with of tubes rocking slightly under load, which I solved with a different method of attaching them to the tiebar. When I build the second board of my layout, I may well use this system myself.

This is my first layout, so my advice may be absolute rubbish; feel free to ignore. Good luck with it anyway!!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Hi Rich,

 

I'm not sure if this will work for your loose heels and in such a small space (or even that my slowed mind is actually adressing your problem), but a common method to allow the rotational moment in ply and rivet tiebar joints in 4mm is to use a flat-headed rivet (brass so it acan be soldered) in a close fitting (but clearance hole) in the tiebar (like http://www.newportmrs.com/TFC/Frecclesham/October%202011/Tie%20Bar.jpg - but next scale down from Senior!)

 

Cheers

 

Jan

  • Like 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Full size the heels switches are held by the fishplate to the closure rail. I would suggest that your heel switches should be held at the heel end perhaps soldered to a pivot of some kind. Then the tiebar only needs to control sideways movement.

Don

Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

at the risk of sounding boring...why not wire in tube to a slide switch...low tech works for me...less sparks to go wrong too.

Link to comment

Thank you all. It helps to get people to shout in sometimes to get ideas forming and the brain re-thinking. Sometimes you are so close to a problem there is no wood, or trees.

 

Pete,

 

I have wire in tube to toggle switches. I couldn't find a 4PDT slide switch (hindsight knows I could have paired up DPDT in this one instance) and needed one for the end of the loop to meet the electrical wiring criteria.

 

Jan,

 

Thank you. I like the idea of a 'rivet' in an inconspicuous tie bar. This would still allow me to feed the switch rails by the fixing medium, and with the rivet under the stock rails the rail height would be maintained. It would actually (for me) work better than the bent wire in tube that others have suggested.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...