Jump to content
 
  • entries
    30
  • comments
    30
  • views
    7,301

"Looking past the Stereotype"


S.A.C Martin

975 views

blogentry-1656-0-83094500-1334831965.jpg

 

The above is an image of a GWR 47xx class, with a face, surrounded by Pannier Tanks with similar faces, which C. Hamilton Ellis penned in 1939 for The Railway Gazette, five years before the first publication by The Reverend W. Awdry in 1944, The Three Railway Engines. The Pannier Tank engines with faces predate the character "Duck" by nearly twenty years!

 

This image is not as significant as it may first appear. Trains with faces have appeared in English literature and satire since 1829.

 

One of the earliest applications of trains with faces, in serious works, was to be found in one of the earliest editions of Dombey & Son by Charles Dickens, where the train which runs over the hapless Carker is illustrated with a reptilian face, an evil and monstrous machine whose very movement shakes the ground like a great serpentine leviathan.

 

In political satire, the "Railway King" Hudson was consistently depicted with locomotives and rolling stock embodying the faces of its passengers and workers, to make political points. This sort of political satire became more and prevalent over the next century with every change to the railways in place!

 

Contemporary to Awdry and at the time, more popular, Eileen Gibb's Sammy The Shunter portrayed locomotives with faces in all sorts of styles, including faces relating more to the image above and the initial style of Awdry's The Railway Series.

 

So my question is thus - why is there this strange, much held belief, that Awdry - and/or Britt Allcroft, Gullane, or the current rights holders, HiT Entertainment, have a patent or specific Intellectual Copyright covering the placement of faces on trains?

 

They certainly do hold the patents for specific character designs, but no such patent for the overall Anthropomorphism of trains (or anything else for that matter) exists, or would be allowed to be held by a single individual or company.

 

I've spent six years of my life examining English Literature and its changes under a fast developing railway system, and what is perhaps most significant is the way in which human attributes are given to inanimate objects such as railway locomotives, ranging from the serious novels of Charles Dickens, to the artwork of esteemed Railway researcher and historian, C. Hamilton Ellis, to children's literature with Eileen Gibbs, and dozens more examples besides.

 

This seems to be a part of English Literature and Railway history completely forgot, in the wake of a little blue tank engine. Harking back to a time where putting a face on a train was a much more natural reaction to the changes in the world around us, be it making a point about the darker side of railways by Dickens, or the politics involved with George Hudson, or trying to entertain and educate children with Sammy the Shunter.

 

I'd like to offer up the view, that I wish the commonly held belief of "Trains with Faces" - the stereotype that is "infringing on Thomas' patents", was not so prevalent as it seems to be...!

 

Does anyone on RMweb remember other examples of trains with faces that predated Awdry's work, in serious literature or children's? I'd love to hear about them.

  • Like 6

2 Comments


Recommended Comments

Its human nature to find the facial features in any inanimate object. Look at a car, can you not see a face? Engines seem to respond to that nature very well.

  • Like 3
Link to comment

I completely agree that neither Hit or whoever holds the rights to the Thomas brand has any right to stop anyone else putting a face on an engine. We had all this argument at The Bluebell Railway and ended up abandoning Thomas days even thuogh the Rev W Awdry wrote a book specifically about our railway and its first engine Stepney, only to have Britt Allcroft tell us that we had an engine that 'resembled' the Stepney of the books!! at which point we said that it had been Stepney since 1875!! and we had any rights we liked to the engine. At this point the Stepney books mysteriously didn't seem to be stocked any more - we should have charged them for the rights to all our engines, which now proliferate in books and models, but we're not like that. It hasn't stopped me from putting faces on our engines in pictures that I paint and I've also made and painted the faces that we used on the full size engines. Anyway the kids still come to look for Stepney even though he hasn't got a face and he's gone black for the past couple of years.

By the way I really like Hamilton Ellis' 'Fast Goods' appropriate as 'Fast' women were a bit on the naughty side and I daresay that was what he was angling at.

  • Like 2
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...