Jump to content
 
  • entries
    3
  • comments
    17
  • views
    2,370

2 mm Wanderings in wonderland, or what to do after Glenuig


sixteen 12by 10s

1,097 views

Glenuig has been on the exhibition circuit, for over a year now, and I have bookings for 2014 and beyond. I an now looking at a follow up project, and have found myself with a big dilemma.

First I have made my mind up on a few points in my plan.

Some kind of 2mm standard

Set on the West Highland, in the 1980's

Well the latter sound familiar, but the 2mm?. This scale has impressed me in the way you can produce a model of a railway in its scenic setting, and it is the creative and scenic side of the hobby that interest my the most. So what track standard, I don't like the look of standard N gauge track, it just looks too chunky, so 2mm finescale looks like the one to go for. The job of making the track has become easier of late, with the introduction by the 2mm associations “Easytrackâ€, when this is carefully laid and ballasted, it looks the business.

 

Now to the location

I have a sketch of an imaginary halt, shack, which would by the next stop up the line from Glenuig. If I went ahead with this option, it would be small and a good tester in this new scale to me.

 

blogentry-7480-0-41524800-1338382050_thumb.jpg

 

But

The one I really want to do, is Bridge of Orchy, this layout would be built on a 8' “doughnut†with the station loop taking up just under half of the viewing area. I would use DCC and sound on this one, the station is in a dip with steep banks out in ether direction. I would set the date at about 1985, so retaining the semaphore signalling, and will just allow me to use 374's, 370's, 27's 20's and the odd 26 and 25.

 

blogentry-7480-0-81590900-1338382091_thumb.jpg

 

So the big decision, do I just “go for it†and make a start on Bridge of Orchy, or start with the smaller, and see how I get on.

 

Gary

  • Like 9

9 Comments


Recommended Comments

  • RMweb Gold

Good to see you finally in the world of 2mm Gary :D

 

I can see the merits of both options and Alan's mini MSW and Tony's Brafferton layout both certainly show how compelling do'nut type layouts are...

 

Why not build a couple of turnouts to begin with...see how you get on with the scale?

 

Have you given yourself a timescale too to work with?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

HI,

 

A possible welcome to the dark side and i do apolagise for turning you to it. I saw you watching Mini M-S-W when we had one of our sound locos running at Railex.

 

I would say possibly start small and try it with your smaller paln to get the nage of building bits and then progress on to the bigger project.

 

One thing i am sure on is it looks like your current layout it will be a fantastic peice of modelling.

 

cheers

Simon

  • Like 1
Link to comment

It seems such a waste of space to have the big fiddle yard - why not have another, but completely different scene , and one can act as fiddle-yard for the other?

  • Like 2
Link to comment

what diameter are you looking at . quite a few ppl seem to be going for circular plans

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Hi Gary,

 

As the others have said, welcome to the wonderful world of 2mm! Glenuig is one of my favourite layouts of recent years, so it's doubly good to see you considering 2mm scale. I would echo the advice offered by others - a simple test track (like your first idea) to try out things like pointwork and loco conversions would be a good first step. There is a very relevant article in the latest 2mm magazine by a certain Barcelona-based RMweb member which was mailed-out last week.

 

Having said that, the Bridge of Orchy plan looks really good too, and I do like the fact that you've not gone for the smallest possible circle - 8ft should give plenty of room nice sweeping curves and room for the landscape.

 

With the recent and imminent loco releases from Dapol and Farish, I can see Scottish layouts becoming more and more popular!

 

Anyway, good luck with whatever you decide to do (and don't forget to keep us updated here!)

 

Andy

  • Like 3
Link to comment

Hi!

 

I too would err on the side of caution and try something smaller first. :D

 

It took me nearly twenty five years as a 2mm modeller to make a start on Brafferton and even then I'm battling away some three plus years later! A layout of that size in 2mm scale is quite an undertaking for the majority of individual modellers, and Brafferton is only 6ft across with 1ft wide boards. I also gleaned a neat tip when building my circular layout; avoid even numbers of boards. In that way, there are never joints directly opposite each other in the circle and the result is substantially stronger. With hindsight, I'd probably have gone for seven boards rather than five; the curved boards are a bit awkward for handling and if yours are 8ft diameter with a 18" (?) width, they'd be right bu99ers...

 

Indeed, good luck; I'll be following your progress with interest.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Hi all

First Pete, there’s a nice Scottish layout in the 2mm mag this month, point taken, pardon the pun, start small with a bit of trackwork, maybe the south end loop points at BoO. Time scale, not really, but it would be nice to think I have something to take over for the Glen, when ether I get fed up of it or the exhibition goers. I do have the 0-16.5 slate quarry, but to operate that at a two day show, sends you loopy.

 

Simon, I spent most of the show around that layout, it works well, actually faultlessly, I am hopeless with putting faces to names on this forum, and intact, as I came away from the show realised who Jim S W was, besides been next to him when I was at Nottingham show.

 

Shortliner, I see where you are coming from, and I will look at the plan again. At this stage I am only thinking about it.

 

The layout will be 8 feet diameter, this size is determined by the space in the workshop, and the ability to fit in the car. Bridge of Orchy lends itself, to the plan as the prototype is on a curving formation.

 

Tony, take your point on the number of boards, I will have to play around. The main problem will be space, the idea is that a scenic board is twined with a flat fiddle yard board, to save space.

 

Anyway, thanks for all your input, its given me a few things to think about, I will keep you all informed of the progress, which will start to pick up pace after Glenuig at Wigan show.

 

Thanks

 

Gary

  • Like 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

I would just add that if you are unsure about making the move to 2mm finescale, then a smaller 'toe dipping' project is deffinately the way to go. There is nothing worse than getting half way through a project and realising you have bitten off more than you can chew!

 

That said, Easitrac makes a world of difference for those who do not get along with the soldering iron and probably speeds up the track laying process somewhat on account of essentially being a length of flexitrack once rail has been threaded.

 

I do like the first plan as a small project, but if you wanted to go for the second plan as a main project, perhaps a smaller, simple test track, or proving board, is the way to go first? I understand Ikea Lack shelving units are quite popular round these parts for small 2mm layouts!

 

I did it slightly differently by not going full 2mm scale to start with, but using the Easitrac components to build finer looking N Gauge track on which I can still run off the shelf stock. Having used the parts now, I would have no problem with going full 2mm finescale on the next layout.

 

Either way, good luck, and I'll be following with interest!

 

Tom.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

I understand Ikea Lack shelving units are quite popular round these parts for small 2mm layouts!

 

:lol:

 

Just to echo Tom's comments...its well worth looking at Tom's excellent blog Gary as his trackwork looks terrific and he won't need to rewheel his rtr rolling stock.

 

If you are not adverse to rewheeling, then 2mmFS is the way forward...but if so, look at Tom's method as described above.

 

The other thing is, perhaps your BoO needn't be a do'nut...perhaps a similar arrangement to Portchullin Tatty?...

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...