Jump to content
 
  • entries
    109
  • comments
    358
  • views
    144,958

"A4 Conversion Test Etches - Part 2"


S.A.C Martin

1,007 views

For some time I had wondered whether I was always going to be an "also ran".

 

By that, I mean someone who is happy to buy ready to run engines, have kits built for them, even maybe weathered for them, and on occasion produce a diorama of sorts which looks more or less the part - but hasn't challenged himself enough.

 

Always that nagging fear, looking at the sheer depth and breadth of modelling on this forum and elsewhere, that I was never going to be anything more than a tinkerer, so to speak, changing numbers and adding some weathering powders, but nothing much else.

 

I've always had this fear that I somehow wasn't good enough to call myself a modeller. There's been some dire projects I have worked on in years gone by, from when I first started modelling seven years ago (which were good to try, and fail in some cases), and even now I know I am not a good modeller...yet.

 

But I think I can now actually call myself a modeller with this particular project. I haven't felt this satisfied with anything I've done in terms of modelling for a long, long time. The whole trial and error of the A4 conversions has finally yielded some results I am happy with.

 

More than, actually. There's one modification to the etches that needs to be done, but on the whole the whole package is superb, and Peter Harvey of PH Designs needs to take a bow for this one. Fantastic design work which results in what I think is a terrific product.

 

I completed the "de-frocking" of the Hornby Kingfisher this afternoon, adding the rest of the etched parts to complete my 1948/49 based A4 Pacific.

 

(Incidentally, this conversion kit is also suitable for 1980s era Sir Nigel Gresley or Bittern, if you use a Hornby Mallard model and find an appropriate tender).

 

So here are the results;

 

blogentry-1656-0-74900700-1340549541_thumb.jpg

 

First up, adding the missing access hatches on the streamlined casing, and the blank smokebox numberplate bracket (which allows the modeller to add an etched replacement, or put a transfer on for the locomotive of their choice), along with an upper lamp bracket replacement (for which the kit also caters for the lower ones, and tender lamp irons. Very handy to have a few spare if there's a model with any damage!)

 

Seen below is a comparison between the modified and unmodified Kingfisher models.

 

blogentry-1656-0-43916100-1340549544_thumb.jpg

 

Then there's the next set of etches to add, on the right hand side the lower firebox sides, and on the left hand side, the same again but with the reverser too (Hornby don't include this on the models with valances, understandably, as it simply wouldn't be seen under the valances).

 

blogentry-1656-0-87186100-1340549547_thumb.jpg

 

blogentry-1656-0-95944500-1340549550_thumb.jpg

 

It's the reverser to lower firebox arrangement where there needs to be a modification. There is a notch on the left hand side lower firebox bracket for the reverser to go through, but on the etches it is at the bottom, rather than the top, and consequently some modification is required on these etches to allow the reverser to sit in its correct position. A minor discrepancy which didn't take long to sort and also doesn't detract particularly from the quality of the conversion kit.

 

So there we have it; the end of this particular portion of the overall trial. There's a few more bits which I will address next week in Part 3, but for the moment, that's all to report. Next time I'll go through the final bits and pieces along with painting the brass components, cleaning up the valances a little more, then naming and numbering the A4 Pacific test candidate - who is Kingfisher for now but won't be next time...

 

Thanks for reading, enjoy the rest of your weekend.

 

Simon

  • Like 3

2 Comments


Recommended Comments

I think you're a wee bit harsh in your opening self-assessment Simon, but as that's not the thrust of your post I won't risk diverting it. Suffice to say, failures show you're pushing your own boundaries, and that you learn things (the hard way) from your mistakes.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Very kind of you to say Jamie, but I look back at some of the projects I've done, and there's been some dire ones in there. Oh, there's a few I'm proud of; no doubt about it, but it's always been bits and pieces and not enough pure focus on the challenge to produce the overall scene.

 

This is one of those "scales dropping from the eyes" moments when I enjoyed the project and it produced a good result. This is what I like doing, problem solving, and my problem was Hornby hadn't produced a 1949 variant of the A4. So here's the solution, brilliantly produced by Peter Harvey.

 

I see myself as an "also ran" because I have the vision but not the skill to produce it yet. When I come up with an overall convincing scene like Peterborough North, or Retford, or even Tom's Leaman Road, then I think I'll have nailed it good and proper.

 

All said, mind, this conversion project has given me a hankering for producing something doable, but still grand in its vision, if not scale. Maybe in the next year, maybe not, we'll see!

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...