Jump to content
 
  • entries
    123
  • comments
    874
  • views
    104,373

A new 'Old Engine' - GWR 184 - part 9


MikeOxon

2,422 views

blog-0677550001423006794.jpg.ecb4214572a981933b6c6c409c182f65.jpg

 

I've read that some people like blog posts to be fairly substantial, so I'll include a resumé, in this post, of the story so far, before showing photos of my model of GWR No. 184. There are more details in the earlier posts in this series.

 

Background

 

I chose this prototype since it was one of the first standard-gauge engines to run on the GWR, following the absorption of the Oxford, Worcester, and Wolverhampton Railway (otherwise known as the 'Old Worse and Worse'). No.184 was one of six engines built by E.B.Wilson in 1853 and this particular engine survived almost until the end of the 19th century, appearing in several photographs that document its re-builds at Wolverhampton Works in 1871 and 1893 It is also the subject of a sketch by C M Doncaster, which shows it at the head of a train of 6-wheelers approaching Reading Station. I decided that I would like to emulate this scene on my model railway.

 

Method of Construction

 

The first step was to create some drawings of the engine from a mixture of both photographs and drawings of similar engine types. I used these drawings to construct paper templates, so that I could check clearances, etc. for an 00-gauge model. I then cut out the major components from brass sheet and rolled the boiler by hand. The following photographs illustrate the major stages in the construction, together with dates at which each stage was achieved.

 

184buildsteps.jpg.84e96f2b12e726464a33a0f09e6863e9.jpg

 

Because I was working mainly from paper templates, I made very few dimensioned drawings and fitted together the various parts by 'trial and error'. I often cut out a part from paper, initially, and then, after trimming the paper to provide a close fit, I replicated the component in brass. The major components of the engine body fitted together as shown below. Although I was concerned, in the early stages, that the structure felt rather weak, it all became pretty rigid, once the various sheets were soldered together. I was pleased to find that very little filler was needed, since the boiler and firebox fitted closely around the wheel arches. I used some book-binders' glue (which appears to be a tough form of PVA), to fill any remaining gaps. This proved very effective in providing a resilient seal, rather like bath caulk.

 

184fireboxassy.jpg.cd610232bbfb72664b7a84320a6113c2.jpg

 

Chassis

 

I built the chassis from a pair of brass strips, soldered together while drilling the holes for the axles and frame spacers. For more details,see part 6 of this series. Initially, the model will be powered by its tender but I have made sure that there is sufficient space for a motor to be fitted inside the boiler.

 

To achieve this space, I cut away the lower half of the boiler, where it is hidden behind the splashers and the firebox. Top and underside views of the body are shown below:

 

184soldering.jpg.27f5a17bf0b0d3be1f3e0d384ce1c71a.jpg

 

Detailing

 

I made boiler bands from 5 thou brass sheet, cut into strips and stuck onto the boiler barrel using super glue. I also added rivet detail to the outside frames by using the brass detailing strips supplied by 'Mainly Trains'. These were also fixed with super glue.

 

I made sandboxes from small wooden blocks, wrapped in 2 thou brass foil, with a separate brass 'lid'. The springs are white metal, mounted above the footplate on nickel-silver wire uprights. Handrails are, similarly, nickel-silver wire (0.5mm). Outside cranks and coupling rods are from 'Alan Gibson'.

 

Since the main dimensions and appearance of the prototype changed very little throughout its re-builds, I keep in mind the possibility of back-dating my model to an earlier time period. I found that 'RT models' supply 4mm scale brass dome and safety valve cover in the E.B.Wilson style but, for the present, I have installed an 'Alan Gibson' '517-type' brass dome.

 

184complete.jpg.70c5324aabef806494ff92aa8ecbf102.jpg

 

Painting

 

I decided to paint my model in a representation of GWR 'Wolverhampton 'livery, which I understand to have been based on the former OW&W livery. The Wolverhampton style of painting differed from Swindon, in that all items above the footplate, including splasher fronts and sand-boxes, were the same colour as the boiler, while the frames below the footplate and the wheels were brown.

 

My first step in painting, after a thorough clean-up of all the brass-work, was to apply an overall spray of grey primer. Then, for the boiler colour, I chose to use 'Rustoleum Painter's Touch' dark green enamel, which looked a reasonable match to descriptions of the 'blue-green' colour used at Wolverhampton This is a water-soluble paint,with a rather 'plastic' feel that dries to a 'wet look' finish. I found that it brushed more smoothly when thinned with a little water I am fortunate to have inherited some 'Winsor & Newton' series 3A sable brushes, which have superb paint-holding capacity and super-fine tips. They really make hand painting a pleasure! I think the finish will need some matt varnish in due course, since even 19th-century cleaners would find it had to maintain such a gloss!

 

For the brown frames and wheels, I used 'Winsor & Newton' Burnt Sienna artists' acrylic colour. Again, I thinned the paint from the tube, to produce a smooth brushing consistency with excellent covering power. If any of the 'painting gurus' on this site happen to read this, I should be interested to know why artists' acrylic is rarely mentioned for model painting, since I found it very pleasant to use.

 

For the black areas (footplate, smokebox, etc.), I used Humbrol black acrylic, which I find dries to a good-looking 'oily' sheen.

 

Lining and Lettering

.

I prepared artwork for the lining and number plate by the methods I have described previously in this blog.

 

Wolverhampton lining was black and white, so I used white inkjet transfer paper. My copy of 'Great Western Way' (1st.ed.) gives few details, except to state that the white edges of the lining were broader than the equivalent orange edging used at Swindon. Another factor to take into account is that the printed black centre lines tend to spread slightly into the unpainted white edges. I made a few test prints to determine appropriate widths that seemed to match the visual impression seen in old photographs.

 

I scanned one side of the model to provide 'actual size' templates of the cab sides and sand boxes, on which I 'drew' the lining on the computer screen, as shown below:

 

184lining.jpg.6691cfa0ecfdeca9a031e301213e2d79.jpg

 

For the brass fillet between the boiler and smokebox, I cut a sliver of 1 thou brass shim and attached it to the boiler with PVA glue. Cutting this very thin material produced a natural curl, which I exploited to help hold it firmly against the boiler.

 

The 'Current' Model

 

I cannot describe the model as 'finished', since there are still many additions and improvements that I wish to make, but it has reached the stage where photographs can give a reasonable impression of what I have been trying to achieve.

 

184withtender.jpg.6b63c49d3ea0339673a1fd435ac08bb0.jpg

My model of GWR No.184 attached to 2500 gal Dean tender (powered)

 

As I mentioned above, the model is not yet 'self-powered' but can be 'driven' by means of the 2500 gal Dean tender that I described in a previous post.

 

When seen in isolation, it's not easy to appreciate its small size and rather 'antique' feel, so I have taken a couple of photos to set it in context.

 

One of my aims, at the outset of this project, was to represent the scene drawn by C M Doncaster. Here is my interpretation, built around some of the models I have built of GWR 6-wheel coaches:

 

182withtrain.jpg.e805fd8715cbb2ada7cbc391c6a89c42.jpg

 

 

and here it is alongside Armstrong's 'Queen' class express 2-2-2, the first of which was designed 20 years after No.184 was built:

 

184Queen.jpg.291e847e16690336c489fc35b6bc722b.jpg

GWR No.184 alongside 'Queen' class at North Leigh

 

Conclusion

 

This was the third model that I have completely 'scratch-built' from brass sheet; the others were the 'Queen'-class 2-2-2 and my interpretation of Dean's 4-2-4T, No.9.

 

It proved a trickier build than the others, mainly because of the 4-coupled chassis but, also, the raised firebox and the need to leave space inside the structure to add a motor at a later date. My 'Queen' was only ever intended to be tender-powered, while the 4-2-4T is powered by a 'Tenshodo' SPUD in the rear bogie.

 

Construction took longer than I expected because of many non modelling-related interruptions and I was beginning to get a little impatient towards the end. There are quite a few mistakes that could be corrected in a re-build, especially the shape of the top of the firebox. I've decided, however, to set engine building on one side, for a while, so that I can concentrate on some scenic work, which is badly needed on my layout, if it is ever to represent the sort of 19th-century scene that I have in mind.

 

If anyone else feels moved to have a go at scratch-building a 19th-century type of locomotive, I would recommend starting with a 2-2-2, since these are very straightforward, with none of the alignment problems associated with coupled engines. I feel that, if you can build a wagon, then a 2-2-2 engine is not that different! Also, I have found that brass sheet is an easy material to use – in some ways easier than plastic card, because it can be folded and rolled into curved shapes. Once you've cut your teeth on a simple prototype, you can follow whatever course catches your imagination.

 

I also realise how much I have learned, and absorbed, from various books, and should mention, in particular, Iain Rice's “Etched Loco Construction”, which helped me over many hurdles.

 

Mike

Edited by MikeOxon
Restore images

  • Like 10
  • Craftsmanship/clever 2

15 Comments


Recommended Comments

Quite a substantial, well presented and interesting blog, that loco shouts / oozes character,  wish there were more blogs like this..

 

snitzl

Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

I think you have done a good job here. I like the loco and found the blog informative.

 

Don

Link to comment

Many thaks for the kind remarks.  I'm pleased you appreciated this entry Snitzl.

 

As I said, there's a lot of detailing still to be done but I was impatient to show the 'story so far'. To be honest, I find the detailing work rather tedious and don't feel in the right mood just at present, so I shall do some more relaxing scenery for while.  I can only spend so long peering through a magnifier :)

 

I forgot to mention that the spectacles on the cab front are from a 'Mainly Trains' etch and the handrail knobs came from a sprue that originally belonged, I think, to an old K's kit.

 

Mike

Link to comment

Thank you James.  Yes, I'm pleased, though I'm acutely aware that my modelling is very basic, compared with some of the real engineering to be seen on this site. I do like to try and capture the 'character' of the prototype and this model has plenty of that.  There's still a tender though.....

Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Wonderful, Mike! That last scene in itself makes the whole project worthwhile, I think. Your modelling is the ultimate proof that there was so much more to the Great Western than the scenes we normally associate with the company.

 

Thanks also for the suggestion to begin with a 2-2-2 for this sort of project. Duly noted!

Link to comment

...I do like to try and capture the 'character' of the prototype...

You've certainly done that, Mike. Interesting to see your interpretation of the Wolverhampton livery against the GWR tender.

 

Nick

Link to comment

Thanks Mikkel.  I think it was the thought of setting up a scene like that last one that kept me going at times. (It's a 'straight' shot by the way - the backscene is genuine)  It's the first time I've 'blogged' a build like this in 'real time', so the thought that others were looking over my shoulder also drove me on.

 

It was discovering part 3 (Absorbed Engines) of the RCTS books on GWR engines that opened my eyes to the early standard gauge engines - so different from the normal GWR image.

 

So what's it to be for Farthing?  A nice 'Sir Daniel' perhaps?

 

Mike

Link to comment

Thank you, Buffalo.  I keep feeling that the green looks 'wrong', being used to Brunswick.  I have some malachite ornaments and the shade is very similar to the darker veins in those.  I believe 'Victorian Green' was a malachite shade, so it is plausible.

 

I plan to build an early-style tender, when I've got my breath back.

 

Mike

Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Thanks Mikkel.  I think it was the thought of setting up a scene like that last one that kept me going at times. (It's a 'straight' shot by the way - the backscene is genuine)  It's the first time I've 'blogged' a build like this in 'real time', so the thought that others were looking over my shoulder also drove me on.

 

It was discovering part 3 (Absorbed Engines) of the RCTS books on GWR engines that opened my eyes to the early standard gauge engines - so different from the normal GWR image.

 

So what's it to be for Farthing?  A nice 'Sir Daniel' perhaps?

 

Mike

 

Oh yes, or a Queen like yours, or how about a pre-River "69" class: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Gooch_standard_gauge_locomotives#mediaviewer/File:GWR_69_class.jpg for a bit of 1890s running! It's way into the future though, when I get around to building the "up main" platform at Farthing (probably about 2-3 recessions into the future).

 

Looking forward to your landscape work (see, we're not letting you off the hook!). 

Link to comment

First bit of layout work will be to tackle the painting of the station building.  After some reading on this website, I now know that white window frames and light/dark stone doors are wrong for my 19thC period. Brown is apparently the colour I should use.  After that, I have one or two ideas for 'features' of the Victorian landscape - there's a 'teaser' for you :)

Link to comment

I think I read all the comments on my 'Wolverhampton' post and then, one day, I was browsing round the local 'Homebase' shop (now closed) and saw the pots of paint on a rack and thought it looked 'about right'.  Nothing more scientific than that, I'm afraid.

 

Mike

Edited by MikeOxon
  • Like 2
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

I think that is the best way. Get the info you can and then go with what seems to fit. I doubt we will ever get a definitive answer on the exact shade. Even if you could find someone who saw it daily it would be a long time ago could you trust your memory back that far.

 

Don

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...