Jump to content
 
  • entries
    92
  • comments
    475
  • views
    77,593

An 09 thats seen better days


Pugsley

701 views

Follow these links for the other stages of this project - I've had to trim the number of entries in the index box, to the right:

Part 2 - More Gronk progress

Part 3 - It doesn't look much different, does it?

Part 4 - End of side 1, please turn over

Part 5 - Side 2

Part 6 - End of side two - approaching the end(s)

Part 7 - Nearly the end(s)

Part 8 - The finished article

 

I know its in the archive, but seeing as this is still a current project, I'd better move it over here.

 

Based on this photo:

http://web.ukonline.co.uk/railscans/pic ... 000310.jpg

 

The model started life as Dick Hardy, but I wanted to do something different with it. I started this ages ago, and it was intended for the later period on Chittle, but now I've got rid of the layout (and the rest of the stock), I'll probably put this one up for sale once finished - I still want to do it justice though.

 

This was how far it had got previously:

 

gallery_6668_11_54069.jpg

 

 

Renumbered, and the black window surrounds and cab door that the Hornby model came with have been painted grey, with a mix matched to the factory finish. I'd also renumbered it with Fox transfers, and changed the warning flashes to the early type (I'd originally planned to do it in 1998 condition, which wasn't much different). It needed fading, and the roof and sides need to be done separately - executive dark grey is a funny colour when faded, it goes a kind of tan colour. Departmental grey, however, just gets lighter.

 

gallery_6668_11_23516.jpg

 

 

At this stage the roof has been faded with washes mixed up from Humbrol 110 and 34. The sides have been attacked with white gouache washes. The numbers have been removed, as the fading virtually obliterated them. I'll put them back later, probably after the first grime layer has gone on - as they're plastic, the oily dirt from the fuel doesn't stick to them.

 

The downside of using this wash technique is the wash gathering in all the detail, and looking very wrong. Since trying this method on the 08 (after using it with some success on my blue 33) I've decided it's a technique that is better suited to smooth sided vehicles. Undeterred though, I pressed on to see what would happen once some grime had been run into the panel lines:

 

gallery_6668_11_6476.jpg

 

And to be quite honest, it looked more than a bit pants. So, I decided that it all had to come off (the beauty of gouache) and that the only way to get the overall fade would be to do a spray fade. I left the gouache washes that I had already put on the yellow on both ends, as I wanted that more faded than the black. A bit of maskol to protect the glazing, the roof masked off, and it was ready to go:

 

gallery_6668_11_12952.jpg

 

The gouache hasn't gone completely, but it doesn't matter as the sprayed fade will even things out. I used Vallejo off-white, heavily thinned with a little screenwash added in the mix to help the surface tension. this was sprayed at relatively high pressure, and just dusted on, and built up gradually.

 

gallery_6668_11_7558.jpg

 

gallery_6668_11_37283.jpg

 

It's looking much better by this stage. It needs a bit more work on the battery and exhauster boxes on one side, and a bit on the solebar of the other, but that can be done with gouache.

Once the dirt starts to be added:

 

gallery_6668_11_62891.jpg

 

It starts to look more like it should from the photo. Numbers have been added again, but from Modelmaster this time - I'm disappointed with how yellow the Fox transfers go.

 

The griming/highlighting needs to be finished on both sides, and then it'll be onto the underframe. I haven't yet decided what technique to use on the underframe - my variation on Martyn Welchs' method, or another idea I've been cooking up, similar to that I use for buffer grease. Hopefully I'll make a decision soon :D

3 Comments


Recommended Comments

  • RMweb Premium

Are you working from actual prototype images?

 

(NB used 'full editor' option)

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...