Jump to content
 
  • entries
    134
  • comments
    483
  • views
    99,813

Dingham Couplers SUPER LOOP Bodge!


Knuckles

990 views

Video Description....


Dingham Auto Couplers - I love them. You can use them with real 3-Link, Instanter & Screw couplings with the minimal of fettling, they provide delayed uncoupling and they use the buffers to propel stock thus giving a very realistic operation and look. Not too unobtrusive either. Plus if you bash the stock aggressively they won't couple so you can do some fly shunting!

 

Problem is, tight curves are a no no because the y will cause buffer locking.

 

After literally MANY months of thinking and a few experiments I finally found a dodge that works.

 

In this clip you will see a very rough and ready 'Super Loop' I made to modify a standard Dingham hook. it needs more refinement but a Black 5 (Henry) is going around a 2nd radius 00 curve with a Gresley teak no problem.

 

I only need a special at each end of a rake and Bob's your Auntie.


 

Baby write up:

 

Daddio ages ago gave me a fishing pellet thingummy, so I chemically blackened Dingham parts and bunged them in. A real boon it is.
6rbrRQZ.jpg

 

Considering I'd need to solder them I got a fresh brass one from the etch.
sjX9dED.jpg

 

Following David Thorp's modification I purposely went overboard and extended the length and width.
It was a very quick nock up thus the rough uneven nature of it.
lQm1vwU.jpg

 

Middle partly removed, needs more filing but good enough for the tests.
R1jyRQk.jpg

 

The extended bar does the pushing on the inside of the coupling hook, that's the concept. Here is a super picture...
McIPLGk.jpg

 


So, current verdict.

 

1) - It works. Nuff said. Tests were mostly with Smiths Screw Link and Standard Dinghams.

 

2) - Shape needs to be a wee thinner and about 1mm longer, possible nominally triangularly shaped with the curved end.

 

3) - Brake pipes can get in the way, yet not on all stock. A little re-shaping of the pipes or hooks will easily get around this.

 

4) - These were tested on 2nd radius 00 curves and I only need a minimum of 34" if doing P4 not the extra silly 2nd radius. Ergo, it'll work better with more gentle curves.

 

5) - I'd only need one 'Super Loop' at each end of a rake of coaches. The rest of the layout stock can have standard Dinghams, 3-Link, Instanter & Screw fitted.

 

6) - Pig in poo.

 

7) - Awaits chastisement!

4 Comments


Recommended Comments

Nice work Gav, and a good result for you. Personally, I don't like Dinghams. They are way too big and look, well, not good. But I do appreciate that they give reliable coupling and un-coupling with hidden electro-magnets. We use them on the new club layout and there's no more double shuffle as when S&W's are used. I never minded the double shuffle, but again I can understand those who don't. 

Love the experiments, keep it up mate.

 

Mike

Link to comment
.....snipped content.....

 

Thanks Mike, always appreciate your posts. :)

 

Ironically one reason I like Dinghams is because to me they DO look rather good and unobtrustive. Within a train they (as far as auto' couplings go) look similar to hook and chains.

 

S&Ws I don't like because they looklike glorified tension locks and more obtrusive!

 

Funny how we both like and dislike the same items for the same reasons yet conclude opposite opinions about them!

 

One of those personal opinion things, couplings are. :D

 

I'd only needa superloop on the ends of coach rakes butif this test proves (once refined) to indeed be the answer then 90% of the locomotive fronts can keep their Smiths screw couplings onas automatic uncoupling won't be needed for coach rakes.

 

Certainly things are looking promising thus.:)

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...