Jump to content
 

Planning Train Services to Weston Super Mare S&D (!)


pbkloss

474 views

Reality Warning - this locational is fictional and so is almost every thing that follows, but it interests me!

 

I've mentioned early on in the blog the chosen 'real' location for my layout, that is an imagined Somerset & Dorset Railway terminus at Weston Super Mare (henceforth abbreviated as WSM).  To me it has several attractions, as firstly, historically it was something that really did almost happen, and secondly a very attractive variety of services both local and long distance could be legitimately run through it.

 

The historical context: Soon after the creation of the S&D, it was looking for a northern outlet.  Before the Bath extension was planned its preferred option was to build north from Wells, (to which it had already built a branch), to Yatton.  The Bristol and Exeter Railway, which had operated the Somerset Central, (the northern half of the S&D) at first countered with a Wells - Bleadon line proposal (Bleadon being just south of WSM) and offered the Somerset Central / S&D (before the joint MR / LSWR takeover) running powers to Bristol. (In reality, the B&E took over the Wells- Yatton proposal and the S&D never did get running powers). How if the B&E offer was accepted by the S&D, the line got built to Bleadon instead of Yatton and the SC / S&D did build their own terminus at WSM to get an operational toe-hold nearer Bristol just before the take over.  The scenario could be like the Settle and Carlisle ... The B&E offer running powers, the S&D accept, the GWR over-rule and make the running powers unusable (just like the LNWR treated the Midland when it tried to access Scotland via the 'little North Western').  Then the S&D says 'What the .... we will build to Bath anyway,  and get taken over .... with WSM and running powers intact.  Then, the MR years later exert some muscle in court and win practical rights to run some services Wells - WSM - Bristol, in revenge for the GWR getting running rights from Gloucester to Bristol.

 

the advantage for the S&D would be much easier gradients for the services running this way, and a time saving that would more than compensate for the extra distance.

 

Then, I would conjecture that in return the GWR would demand, and get running powers from the S&D from Wells to Evercreech and really put in that junction with the Wilts and Dorset, but facing south towards Castle Cary, giving a shorter and quicker Bristol to Weymouth route. (Remember that the B&E / GWR had already got running powers, never used, from Highbridge to Evercreech and that curve and junction never built near Bruton on the original S&D).  Plus the East Somerset could be used to run Bristol - Westbury via WSM.

 

A few curves built later at the junctions facing the wrong way and you have some really useful routes and services that could be run on them, e.g.:

 

(MR / LMS / LMR) - Bristol - WSM - Wells - (new curve North to South to avoid reversing) - Glastonbury (new curve North to East to avoid reversing) - Evercreech - Bournemouth

(GWR / WR) - Bristol - WSM - Wells - Shepton Mallet (new curve West to south) - Evercreech - (new curve North to West at Bruton) - Castle Cary - Weymouth

 

Plus services that terminate or need a loco change at WSM would run via the S&D terminus, examples in the 60's would be the Merchant Venturer (terminating), the Cornishman and the Devonian, and a a pinch a diverted Pines and other S&D long distance trains, to save pressure at an overloaded Bristol Temple Meads. Gloucester locals could be started back from WSM to connect with S&D locals.  The Bristol to Bournemouth semi-fasts could be run much faster via WSM and so on.

 

Local services would be WR Bristol - WSM - Wells - Shepton Mallet - Frome; S&D WSM - Wells - Glastonbury (reverse) - Evercreech

 

I think I made my own case!!

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Informative/Useful 1

5 Comments


Recommended Comments

My personal reality is a little less complicated. The S&D terminates at its southern end at a point where it reaches the LSWR Main line to the West. The station, known as Broadtemple, has 3  S&D terminal platforms (or more precisely platform edges) and 2 through  LSWR/SR through platforms. It is still very much a work in progress. The single line S&D track is largely an incline of 1:50, much of it hidden so the tight curves are not visible, which runs to an elevated cassette fiddle yard. 

10E8C57D-CA49-4E20-BB30-FDDCA3EDC08E.jpeg

Link to comment

At least you have something to show and it looks good ... mines still at the talk stage :-)

 

 

Link to comment
On 05/03/2019 at 22:21, pbkloss said:

At least you have something to show and it looks good ... mines still at the talk stage :-)

 

 

Any progress yet?

8D641A37-94C5-4C68-8E91-503938E3F2C5.jpeg

Link to comment

I wish ... I'm still working on the room finishing off its insulated lining. Bits of board lying around and bits of wood to make the remaining baseboards.  The workbench has a Mk1 composite under construction ... I will post something when I have something to show!  Thanks for asking.  BTW I love what you have done.

Link to comment

Looks good.  Great concept, well worked out.

Can I make a couple of observations on the OP photo.  The platforms are too high,  Should be 3ft max and buffer centrelines are 3ft 3" so buffers shafts should be above passenger platform level and the 14XX clearly isn't. I made the same mistake 30 years ago and it really annoys me now but is really too much work to put right.  At your stage slipping a sheet of 1 or 2mm ply under the track should be quite simple.  Some goods platforms especially in covered goods depots were higher, to facilitate loading vans etc ,Also track was normally dead straight, laid by human eye in steam days, not laid by lazer to look like a dogs hind leg its well worth using brand new straight out of the box pristine flexi track laid with a straight edge, if it bends or kinks use it for  curve and substitute a new bit.

Stations with through and terminal platforms are rare.  Platforms are rare full stop south in the South West.   They needed different platforms for different destinations in the Midlands as many travellers were illiterate and there were no tannoys so folk had to know where to get their train.  Thats not to be Racist against northerners, southern folk were also illiterate but the wages were so bad they couldn't afford to travel.  Plenty of trains terminated at two platform through stations, and 4 platforms was very large by GWR / LSWR standards.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...