Jump to content
  • entries
  • comments
  • views

Before I went Pre-Grouping




I am very grateful for the appreciative comments on my recent posts and very pleased to know that some of my earlier posts are still considered to be a useful resource.  I confess that I am still finding it hard to adapt to the ‘new’ (well, fairly new) RMWeb format and don’t seem to dip into here as much as I used to do – it’s an age thing I suppose.


Progress with the 3D printer continues to be slow – two small grand-children do take up a fair bit of my energy resources and I have many other hobbies that I am trying to fit in as well!


I recently introduced the nearly-three year old grand-son to ‘North Leigh’ and realised just how fragile most of my models are.  Fortunately, my model is completely enclosed with a transparent front screen but that does limit operations, which still depend quite a lot on the ‘big hand from the sky’.  A lot of my scratch built items were made more for the sake of appearance rather than robustness, so I find the ready-to-run (RTR) stock is by far the most reliable when exposed to the somewhat random movements applied to the controller by the grand-child.  Having said that, he really enjoys reversing a train into the tunnel and bringing it out again to the station, with a rush!




The Tri-ang clerestories in the charge of my Wills 1854 pannier, built on a Hornby chassis, proved by far the most reliable stock, for exposure to such treatment, and reminded me how those older models were designed with ‘kiddie interest’ in mind, far more than is the case for most modern RTR models.


By chance, my older brother was clearing out his loft recently and came across the model railway, which he had as a child and which passed on to me, when I was around 8 years old.  I added a few extra items to the original ‘Princess Elizabeth’ train-set and enjoyed the ‘play value’ that these items added.  My favourite item was the R227 utility van, which featured opening doors, through which I could load and unload various stores.  I also liked the barred windows, which made the vehicle look rather ‘important’.




It is a testament to the original design that these models provided ‘play value’ for many years and survived intact.  It gave me great pleasure to set up the whole railway, a few days ago, in the well-remembered format, on the carpet as of old.



The coal wagon, like the utility van, had opening side doors, which allowed ‘coal’ to be loaded and unloaded, while the level crossing provided the interface between the railway and my much-loved collection of Dinky Toys.


The coaches, from the original ‘Princess Elizabeth’ set, vividly show the problem of warped roofs, endemic in these early Triang models.  I intend to see whether hot water treatment on a suitable former is able to correct the distortion. 


Of course, the model ‘Princess’ bears very little resemblance to the prototype locomotive but that never seemed to matter much to an 8-year old – the important thing was that it represented a main-line express locomotive, like the ones I could see at the head of the ‘Royal Scot’, rushing through Preston Station. What’s more, it could hurtle round those 15” radius curves with no tendency to leave the track.




I know that these thoughts are extremely heretical to all those P4 modellers but the fact remains that my interest in model railways was kindled by playing with these models, which fulfilled the ‘play’ needs of a young child.


Nowadays, what will be available for my grand-children when they reach the appropriate age?

  • Like 9
  • Agree 1


Recommended Comments

My grandson is six.  He was bought a Hornby set with a loco and two wagons.  He then made his own station.  At Christmas he was given a Railroad Pannier and a second hand Hornby Toad brakevan.  (Why is it Toad?  Cos' its at the end of the train.)  Only trouble is that it has been put away as it was always out on the floor.  A bit like his grand dad's railway.  (Put away that is.)


I think the Princess Elizabeth looks rather good, I can hardly see the difference.

  • Like 1

Share this comment

Link to comment

Thank you, Chris.  It seems that some of us can still see as little children :)

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1

Share this comment

Link to comment
9 hours ago, MikeOxon said:

 It seems that some of us can still see as little children :)


An important ability.


Nice to see and read of these memories Mike, and the combo of an 1854ST and Triang clerestories is always heart warming.


I have a feeling that we were having a conversation on one of your old blog entries, but I can't remember where!


Edited by Mikkel
  • Like 1

Share this comment

Link to comment

Thank you Mikkel.  I agree about the 1854 and clerestories, which are such reliable runners, as well.  The tank has come out a rather strange colour in the photo; I suspect because of the various mixed light sources.


you commented about some of my old posts on my previous entry to this one

  • Thanks 1

Share this comment

Link to comment

Now that you mention it, the lamps are a funny shade too!


Thanks for the reminder, I belatedly realized that I could also use my own activity feed to trace it.

Share this comment

Link to comment
25 minutes ago, Mikkel said:

Now that you mention it, the lamps are a funny shade too!


 They look as though the lanterns are made of beaten copper!

  • Like 1

Share this comment

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.