Jump to content
  • entries
    128
  • comments
    893
  • views
    141,378

Hattons/DJM 14XX - now completed

I've now finished weathering 1458 and the loco is now considered 'ready for service'.

 

1458 and 1420 were the two regular locos on the Kington and Presteigne goods services in the early 1960s, until the lines finally closed in 1964. Both continued in service for a few months, with 1420 getting preserved by the Dart Valley Railway and 1458 seeing her days out on the Chalford auto trains, shedded at Gloucester.

 

In my timeline, the railway beyond Kington to New Radnor was not closed in 1951, together with the extension to Rhyadar, so the 14XXs would have worked beyond Kington to Capel Bethesda, where goods traffic with the Vale of Radnor Light Railway was exchanged.

 

Due to the extension beyond New Radnor to Rhayadar (which was initially meant to be part of a through route from the Midlands to the Welsh coast), the line was upgraded to take heavier locos, so we now see various types of pannier tanks appearing at Capel Bethesda, together with 22XXs and the occasional larger loco.

 

It's nice, though, to have a couple of 14XXs available, though, as a nod to the real life lines that closed in 1964.

 

Although I have some quite dirty and heavily-weathered locos, I wanted 1458 to represent a loco that had been looked after and was kept relatively clean by the local crews (a nod, perhaps, to the almost fanatical cleaning regime applied to the regular loco on the Golden Valley line a few miles away and a few years earlier).

 

The loco was sprayed with a weathering mix of diluted Humbrol enamels, based on the methods described by Martyn Welch. The first layer was largely rubbed off again, when touch-dry and a second mix applied, leaving the original dirt lodged in the nooks and crannies. A bit of brush weathering followed, together with a final 'blow over' from the airbrush.

 

(The other 14XX is one of the Hattons factory-weathered examples and I've yet to decide what to do about that, as it's really a bit too dirty!).

 

20190807_103057.jpg.a77d78cbee9d1a7a571083e89e19b8c9.jpg

 

20190807_103122.jpg.391dd8a56225101e0aa018e6e634f318.jpg

 

20190807_103106.jpg.9de8839b14adfe9b288aad0dcb1b6be0.jpg

 

20190807_103327.jpg.d5a31526fb3bda43407a69e8afff88c1.jpg

 

And finally, a kind and observant soul has pointed out something that I already knew, namely that the really 1458 retained the early crest right until the end. I only realised myself a few weeks ago, but decided that as my layout's whole 'raison d'etre' is really rather outrageously improbable, then I could get away with saying that the loco acquired the later crest when it was reboilered in the late 1950s (earlier photos show 1458 with a top feed, later ones show her without).

 

And I'm not messing with it now that it's finished!

 

  • Like 22
  • Craftsmanship/clever 6


9 Comments


Recommended Comments

Have you modified the coupling rods, by chance as my two look very different?

 

Kevin

Share this comment


Link to comment
1 hour ago, Strathwood said:

Have you modified the coupling rods, by chance as my two look very different?

 

Kevin

Kevin, not sure if you are aware, but the loco has a completely new chassis, which in my case is a Perseverance kit - 

 

 

In terms of the kit, I don't recall that I modified the coupling rods.

 

Edited by Captain Kernow

Share this comment


Link to comment

That explains it all I had missed all previous info on your loco, thanks.

 

Kevin

Share this comment


Link to comment

My apologies, 

 

Did you rebuild two examples of the DJM 14XX, if so, did you take the same approach to each?

 

Whatever the answer, it has been very informative, thank you.

 

JB

Share this comment


Link to comment

Hello, my Captain. Just in case you ever need to know a little bit about brushes and their uses . . . . . . . . 

 

Thank you, Mr Bonwick, Sir. I appreciate your comments (now that you've told me about them and I've found them!) and I most humbly abase myself in front of your Glorious Personage in apologetic humblitude for not having checked beforehand.

 

Edited by Captain Kernow

Share this comment


Link to comment
On 12/08/2019 at 11:03, Jack Benson said:

My apologies, 

 

Did you rebuild two examples of the DJM 14XX, if so, did you take the same approach to each?

 

Whatever the answer, it has been very informative, thank you.

 

JB

Hi Jack,

 

Apologies, only just seen your post. I haven't (as yet) done anything to the second 14XX. The back-to-backs (at 15mm in lieu of the more normal 14.5mm) don't like my 'OO-SF' (never again) pointwork on Bethesda Sidings, so until I've sorted that out, I'm holding off a decision on a replacement chassis.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.