Jump to content
 
  • entries
    261
  • comments
    1,413
  • views
    143,356

Pug improvements


Barry Ten

803 views

pug1.jpg.6a0b9856d2e52765e13aac2eb67335c7.jpg

 

This Dapol pug was one of the first models I bought after returning to the hobby in the mid 1990s. Living in the Netherlands at the time, my purchases were confined to occasional visits to the UK or those few Dutch retailers who sometimes had British stock for sale. This model, if I'm remembering rightly, was bought at one of the big Eurospoor model shows in Utrecht, for the princely sum of 115 Guilders, from the stand of "De Spoorzoeker". This friendly Dutchman (Harry, if I'm also remembering rightly) had a very well-stocked shop in Borkel, near the Belgium border, which I visited on subsequent occasions, mainly because he always has good stocks of Hornby.

 

Alas, the pug was a terrible runner! I don't think it ever made it around my layout without stalling at every bit of pointwork or mildly dirty track. It ended up getting a test run every few years but to no discernible improvement! 

 

I know these Dapol models are not regarded as particularly good runners, but this week I decided to take a more methodical look at the problem and see what could be done, without going to the time and expanse of a new brass chassis.

 

Some disassembly showed that the basic chassis is perfectly free-running, so it ought to have a chance of running reasonably well. So why was it so temperamental? Testing revealed that while pickup from the rear axles was reliable, there was almost none to speak of from the front wheelsets. In addition, the back to backs were found to be very tight, such that it wouldn't run through a Peco double slip without bumping over the crossings.

 

Suitably motivated, I decide to tackle these issues.

 

The back-to-backs were adjusted first, using the high-tech approach of gently levering the wheels out with the flat part of a screwdriver, a tiny step at a time.  I was surprised at how far I had to shift them before the Pug traversed the slip without bumping. Since I also use shims to tighten my Peco flangeways, the wheels were eased out even more . This done, the Pug could be pushed through slips, crossings and points without resistance.

 

I then took a careful look at the supplied pickups. These are very flimsy fixtures which might work if properly adjusted. The problem is that once the wheels are in place, the pickups are all but inaccessible. I tried cleaning and re-bending them, but nothing improved the pickup from the front wheels. I therefore decided to fashion a new set of pickups for all four wheels, as shown here:

 

pug2.jpg.d967e918bb43f0a3a06dc96d06bd5114.jpg

 

 

The problem here is that there's very little room to work, due to the minimal clearance between the keeper plate and the tops of the rails. I therefore had to get a bit creative. Areas adjacent to the wheels were carved away to allow the pickups to bear onto the treads without touching the rails (not a problem on plain track, but an instant short circuit through points and crossings, for obvious reasons). PCB pads were fixed to the keeper plate and 0.35mm Phosphor-bronze wire used to form both the pickups, and the extensions which take the current to the pads at the rear of the chassis, and then up to the motor terminals. Unfortunately, the clearances were still too tight. I therefore opted to melt the extensions into the keeper plate, touching them with an iron until they sank into the plastic and allowed that vital fraction of a mm which then permitted the main pickups to be arranged within the available room. I retained the original pickups and wiring as a belt-and-braces approach.

 

Also visible in this shot are areas of the cylinder cover which have been trimmed back slightly to provide for the crosshead movement, now that the wheel spacing is wider.

 

The effect of these two tweaks, the back-to-backs and the pickups, is an immediate and pleasing improvement in slow speed running, with the pug now proving fully capable of slow running and being stall-free across all pointwork. It's still somewhat noisy compared to a Hornby Peckett and can't be got down to an absolute crawl, but it's still not a bad showing given its age, and the less than brilliant reputation of these mechanisms.

  • Like 10
  • Informative/Useful 2
  • Craftsmanship/clever 2

5 Comments


Recommended Comments

Hi Al,

 

I've come back to this post as I'm facing a similar problem with an old Hornby 48xx. Although one of the better versions in many regards (2008 vintage) it still suffers from less than perfect wipers.

 

Step 1 I've replaced the driving axle + their traction tyres with one + plain wheels from an Airfix. That went well and performance on a Rolling Road now is 100% but when you get to track, the side to side motion highlights the wipers' weaknesses.

Step 2; I have some PB wire on its way and thought your design would be good. Easy to apply from beneath whereas wipers from above would have to avoid shorting all the metal weighting materials.

 

My question relates to maintaining tension against the wheel rims on your Pug when there's side to side movement. Is there enough tension there for the wipers to follow the wheels sideways since the tip sections are (mostly) not parallel to the axle.Any helpful guidance will be appreciated.

 

There's probably enough space in my model to take wires up from beneath. If I did that do you think wires along the tires would be better than the edge wiping you're using?

 

Best wishes,

 

Colin 

Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Hi Colin

 

I always make sure there's enough springiness to follow any sideways motion of the wheels, although it can sometimes take a bit of adjustment to get there.

 

To set up the wipers, I aim to follow the Tony Wright guidelines, which is two bends in the wire. I try to get the first bend about in line with the axle, and the second

bend about half way between the axle and the wheel-rim - but it can vary depending on the model. In the case of the Pug, I've ended up with three bends, but with a 

bit more alteration of the keeper plate, I could probably have kept it to two. Ideally, I like the point of contact with the wheel rim to be at a relatively shallow angle, 

whereas those on the Pug area bit sharper than ideal. A shallow angle helps with maintaining contact as the wheel moves sideways. However, the arrangement

on the Pug does work. One thing I find is that, the first time you form the bends, they don't have quite enough tension to be reliable, so it can take a few adjustments

to get them bearing reliably. However, once adjusted, I find that they work forever without any further tweaking. The sign of a good pickup is that wheels stop getting dirty

due to micro-arcing: a loco can run quite well with bad pickups but the wheels will pick up dirt much more quickly, until the running degrades. I can only speak

for myself but I've only ever had great success with edge wipers.

 

Tony prefers 0,45mm wire, whereas I've used 0.33mm here. I wouldn't say there's much in it, except that the 0,33 mm stuff is slightly thinner if space is an issue. I

prefer it for coach lighting as it imparts a bit less drag, but for locos in general I stick to 0.45mm most of the time. Some people swear by Phosphor bronze, I've found

that it works well but so does Gibson brass wire.

 

Hope this is helpful - and good luck with the 48XX!

 

Al (Barry Ten)

Link to comment

Thanks Al,

 

Most helpful, I've seen so many different arrangements that this guide will be my go-to reference point.

 

As to wire I'm rather limited by what was on offer at Wizard, viz 0.33mm and it's a long wait until I'm back in the UK.

 

Colin

 

 

Edited by BWsTrains
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Excellent rundown, very helpful - cheers! I bought a chassis kit a while ago from High Level Kits to improve my Pug - I wish I'd read this first, it would've saved me a bit of cash. However, I think I might use the old chassis for a kitbash project, so I'll use these tips to improve what I have to work with. Thanks again

 

Great to see the number 19 on the side as well. That loco feels like an old friend at this point, having visited it so many times over the years as a static exhibit at the Ribble Steam Railway. I ordered some custom etched plates from Narrow Planet that arrived recently, so I'm looking forward to getting the rest of the upgrades finished so I can add the plates and get the model looking as close as possible to how I remember the prototype before she went off to East Lancs Railway.

 

Edited by JamFjord
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

It does run well now, but I'd imagine it would be even better with a High Level kit. However, I got it out for a trundle the other day, and was still pleased with the improvement, so for me it was a "win" given the difference before and after and the relatively low investment of time and money!

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...