Jump to content
 

Day 59: Shunting puzzle thoughts


TurboSnail

454 views

I didn't do any actual modelling as such yesterday (it was too hot for anything involving moving about and soldering), instead I had a think about some of the challenges I can do on my layout.

 

The main challenge is the classic inglenook, using the headshunt at position 1 (that fits 5 wagons) and the sidings at 2 and the through line at 3. The sidings at 2 can hold up to 4 wagons, possible 5 small ones if I want to increase the difficulty that way. Then additional challenges can be added. I'm thinking at the moment, I want to add a brake, which needs to be sorted out from the incoming train at 1, stored on the run-round at 4, then re-attached to the back of the completed train. This gets a bit complicated as the loco has to run round and finish at 3 instead of at 1. The other challenge is having a certain van that needs to unload at point 5, then get sorted back into the outgoing train in the usual random order (probably to be decided with a shuffled card system). Maybe I could try both extra challenges at once, but I'm not sure that's actually possible with the brake blocking the run-round loop!

 

Any idea for any other challenges I could try?

 

day59.JPG.6be05bc08ad13ef83d5d219d4c779203.JPG

  • Like 4

6 Comments


Recommended Comments

  • RMweb Premium

I like the pair of asymmetric three ways. I'm toying with a biscuit factory layout idea - have a think about what happens when you put a pair of three-ways heel-to-heel with the middle road common. You'll need a couple of short diamonds... 

 

To remain closer to your existing plan, keeping the run-round more or less where it is, join the top road of the RH three-way to the middle road of the LH three-way. Only needs one short diamond.

 

How close together can the three-ways be squeezed?

 

Even with your current plan, I think you really need a train length (or maybe train less guard's van) to the right of the toe of the RH three-way.

Edited by Compound2632
  • Like 1
Link to comment
57 minutes ago, Compound2632 said:

I like the pair of asymmetric three ways. I'm toying with a biscuit factory layout idea - have a think about what happens when you put a pair of three-ways heel-to-heel with the middle road common. You'll need a couple of short diamonds... 

 

To remain closer to your existing plan, keeping the run-round more or less where it is, join the top road of the RH three-way to the middle road of the LH three-way. Only needs one short diamond.

 

How close together can the three-ways be squeezed?

 

Even with your current plan, I think you really need a train length (or maybe train less guard's van) to the right of the toe of the RH three-way.

 

The plan is more or less fixed now, as the baseboard has been made - if I had more space, I would have made it bigger. The 3 way points while unusual in reality help condense it into that space. All the spaces at the end of points have been measured up to allow the biggest loco I'm planning to use (SER R), plus the biggest wagon (Open A), plus a bit of space left over. Smaller locos and wagons (e.g. Manning Wardle B plus 2-plank ballast) might be able to fit the loco + 2 wagons, which would alter the challenge slightly

  • Like 2
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium

Nothing unusual at all about the three-ways - unless you mean in the inglenook context. I'm just toying with variations on using them heel to heel as you do here.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
1 hour ago, Compound2632 said:

Nothing unusual at all about the three-ways - unless you mean in the inglenook context. I'm just toying with variations on using them heel to heel as you do here.

 

I though 3-way points were relatively rare in real life, due to the additional complexity? I'm learning new things all the time (and will have to give the person who told me that a ticking off!)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium

The Midland at least was addicted to them, certainly in goods yards and marshalling yards.

  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to comment

We put a new tandem in Acton Yard about 5 or 6 years ago. Not quite a 3 way but saves the issue with point blades getting in each others way that you get with a 3 way - and it still saves a load of space.

Not that Acton yard is inglenook material!

 

Will

Edited by WillCav
  • Like 1
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...