Jump to content

A Standard Goods for North Leigh - Part 2


MikeOxon

334 views

It’s some time since I’ve scratch-built a standard gauge locomotive, having been spending my time recently on Broad Gauge models.  I learned several lessons, however, during the construction of my previous 00-gauge models, the most important of which was to remember that 00-gauge is actually a narrow gauge – closer to 4’ than 4’ 8 ½”, when scaled.

 

My first scratch-build, described in 'Railway Modeller', July 2014, was of a 2-2-2 ‘Queen’ class engine, which was a simple choice because single-drivers create no problems of coupling rods and their alignment. As I commented at the time, building a ‘single’ is little different from building a wagon, especially if tender-drive is used for the model.

 

995853618_GWRQueenmodel.jpg.981fcf322407f9bac7805f645d8b9613.jpg

My ‘Queen’-class model

 

The problem of ‘narrow gauge’ raised its ugly head when trying to fit the large driving wheels since, in 00 gauge, they intercepted space occupied by the boiler! The solution was to cut oval apertures in the sides of the boiler, where they are hidden behind the splashers.  It’s a good job I didn’t attempt an earlier version, with ‘open’ splashers. A rather wide gap between the wheels and the outside frames remains obvious at some angles.

 

Later, I built a model of one of the former West Midland Rly. Engines, which was absorbed by the GWR as No. 184, where it retained the ‘Wolverhampton’ livery.

 

145110791_GWR184517models.jpg.f115fbc735d93f8c5089feca8c7d0d63.jpg
My model of GWR No.184, with ‘517’ class

 

In this second case, the ‘narrow gauge problem’ appeared when attempting to fit the outside coupling rods. I found that I had been over-generous in my frame spacing and couldn’t prevent the outside cranks from rubbing on the frames. Because of the way I had constructed this model, it was not simple to reduce the separation of the frames, I had formed the frames by folding down the edges of the rectangular plate that represented the footplate. Part of the problem was that I had forgotten to take account of the thickness of the folded edges, which made the outside dimensions wider than I had intended. Another ‘lesson learned’.

 

With these ‘lessons’ firmly in mind, I began to prepare drawings of my new engine, taking account of 00-gauge constraints.

 

As noted in my previous post, I have a side-on photo of No.31 and a drawing of Armstrong’s earlier No.361, which differed in the style of the frames. By merging information from these two sources, I prepared outline drawings to form a basis for my model, as shown below:

 

1522504183_Armstrongfrontside800x300.jpg.5afe8b3c4fe783828aee69b8951c8d51.jpg

My Interpretation of an Armstrong Standard Goods with Original Boiler - derived from various sources

 

In the head-on view, I have marked in red the positions of 00-gauge wheels.  Although they will just be clear of the boiler (including an allowance for cladding), they will interfere with the smokebox cladding and the lower sides of the firebox, so I shall need to make allowance for these intrusions.  In both cases, the necessary openings will be concealed by the splashers, which I shall maintain close to their ‘true’ locations.

 

I have examined several different early photos of the prototypes and it is clear that some fittings, such as the location of the injectors on the sides of the boiler barrel, varied quite widely. I decided to add a cab, since these were adopted quite soon after the introduction for these engines although initially in a more truncated form.

 

My plan for the actual ‘build’ is to adapt techniques I developed when making broad-gauge engines, such as my Gooch Goods, in that I intend to use a combination of brass components and 3D-printed overlays. This is the first time I have adopted this approach for a standard gauge model engine.  It follows my tradition of trying out new techniques with every model I build :)

 

My starting point, therefore, was to construct a set of outside frames, For strength, I decided to make these from lengths of 6 mm x 1 mm brass strip. In fact, I took a single length of strip, marked off the lengths of the sides at 95 mm and marked the width to give clearance to the ‘narrow gauge’ 00 wheels.

 

I then used a square-section needle file to make vee-shaped grooves in the brass strips at the appropriate positions to fold the strip into a 95 mm x 21.5 mm (inside) rectangle.

 

Armstrong-Frames-1.jpg.ccb4dec4f5b5091d97cf2008bc003b64.jpg

Cutting groove and folding into rectangle

 

I ‘squared up’ the resulting box form over a sheet of graph paper. Once the assembly was ‘square’, I soldered the final joint and trimmed off the excess strip by using a diamond cutting wheel in my mini-drill. Careful trimming with needle files removed any remaining rough edges.

 

The main boiler assembly was even simpler. I bought a length of 21/32” (16.7 mm) brass tube from ‘Cornwall Model Boats’, which provides an outside boiler diameter equivalent to the prototype’s 4’ 2”. I shall add cladding by means of a 3D-printed sleeve, as I have done previously for my model of a Gooch goods.

 

Armstrong-Frames-2.jpg.ac527732be991c08cfa2ca5e6125609f.jpg
Brass skeleton of my planned model

 

These brass components will form the ‘hard’ skeleton of my planned model and, in the next stage, I shall add 3D-printed parts to carry the details of the outside frames and of the boiler cladding, smoke-box, and firebox.

 

I intend to use ‘Alan Gibson’ wheels on extended (32 mm) axles, to carry the outside cranks and coupling rods.

 

I hope that my next post will show something that looks more like a locomotive :)

 

Mike

 

 

  • Like 9
  • Craftsmanship/clever 1

5 Comments


Recommended Comments

  • RMweb Gold

I look forward to this with great anticipation!

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

I agree with Dave, I feel actual excitement! 

 

Thanks also for laying it out in such a paedagogical pedagogic easy to follow style, Mike. Seeing the photos immediately made my fingers itch to have a go. Is the intention to eventually compile the posts into an instructive magazine article? If so it is working for me.

 

Quote

00-gauge is actually a narrow gauge

 

Spoken like a true Great Western man :)

Link to comment

Thank you Mikkel..  I try to write in a way that will allow me to remember how I did things - these posts are needed to jog my memory :)

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.