Jump to content
 
  • entries
    400
  • comments
    930
  • views
    288,483

More J39 progress


Fen End Pit

501 views

A good Friday night and weekend of activity sees more progress on the J39 Chassis Kit from Dave Bradwell

 

blogentry-7212-12638556781143_thumb.jpg

The frames get the various additional plates to form the back end of the pistons.

 

blogentry-7212-12638556986933_thumb.jpg

This shows the slide bars in place for the (dummy) connecting rods.

 

blogentry-7212-12638557179231_thumb.jpg

The coupling rods have been assembled, complete with the rivot for the joint.

 

blogentry-7212-12638557105556_thumb.jpg

And the hornblocks and guides were made up. These are going to be fun as there is no slot in the hornblock and just a piece of brass on the outside. This means that while they will be fine when assembled I suspect holding the jig axles in place to solder them into the chassis will be 'fun'.

 

David

3 Comments


Recommended Comments

Yes, having the axlebox flange on the outside only will prevent the use of springs to hold the horn-guides against the frames (my normal method). You might be able to get away without springs and keep the axleboxes in place with Blutac or there is high temperature adhesive tape available which might be useful to hold the horn-guides in place till tack soldered. Finally, a thought which will probably get me drummed out of the loco builders guild - if you turn the axleboxes upside down (not back-to-front), the flanges will be on the inside, allowing the normal assembly method. Turning the boxes this way will not affect the longitudinal position of the holes in case of any eccentricity in the fore-aft direction. Please don't hit me, it's just an idea!

 

Chassis coming along nicely, by the way.

 

Dave.

Link to comment
..... if you turn the axleboxes upside down (not back-to-front), the flanges will be on the inside, allowing the normal assembly method. Turning the boxes this way will not affect the longitudinal position of the holes in case of any eccentricity in the fore-aft direction. .....

 

Assuming I've understood this correctly, if there is a slight eccentricity in the box fore and aft, then turning it upside down will surely move the eccentricity to the opposite side? I.e. if the axle hole was biased towards the front in the normal position, then it would move to be biased towards the back if you turned it upside down.....

 

Or have I looked at it from the wrong angle?

Link to comment

Assuming I've understood this correctly, if there is a slight eccentricity in the box fore and aft, then turning it upside down will surely move the eccentricity to the opposite side? I.e. if the axle hole was biased towards the front in the normal position, then it would move to be biased towards the back if you turned it upside down.....

 

Or have I looked at it from the wrong angle?

 

Yes, but the boxes are also being inserted from the inside of the frames. Imagin having a box in its correct position, then drop it down out of the horguide, turn it upside down - sort of end over end under the frames, so the retaining flange is now inside but the front and rear of the box remain unaltered. The axis of rotation is the horizontal centre line parallel with the frames, not the axle centre line. A diagram might help, but I'm not at home and haven't got access to a scanner.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...