Jump to content
 

1900s MR - An Introduction


MarshLane

1,117 views

As a kid I was heavily into real and model railways, thanks to my Dad.  We had a large OO gauge layout in the loft, although like many it was more playing trains that modelling!  Then in my late teens/early 20s, the modelling side of the hobby just ceased to hold the interest.  OO gauge was looking more and more toy like and lacked the realism for me, and as a result my interest wained.

 

In my mid-30s, a revival of the model side, thanks to a friend, came about and I acquired a significant number of modern image O gauge items, and while I still love the realism and presence of 7mm today, I had to accept the realisation that I just didn’t have the space for what I wanted to do.  I struggled for a while to find a layout proposal in a scale that would work in the space I had.  One of my big problems being a broad interest in anything on rails!  Whether its from pre-grouping to nationalisation, steam to electric, trains to trams and light rail, seeing a picture would spark my mind off into ‘ooh that would make a nice little layout!’.

 

 

The Farthing and Bath incentive

A few years ago on rmWeb I discovered @Mikkel, who has a blog on the site and creates miniature working dioramas based around his fictional town of Farthing. The models are set in the pre-grouping era of the Great Western and his modelling is wonderful and detailed, but each of the dioramas are only small, probably 3ft x 1ft at maximum, with a communal traverser that can be used with any of them.  The various blog entries, many of which focus on little stories set around the dioramas are wonderful light hearted reading, and really show a different take on what we traditionally see in model format.

 

Just recently, when having a few days of “I want to have a layout I can work on and run, but cannot come up with anything that works for me from a scenic and operational viewpoint”, Mikkle posted a new update and the cogs started turning once more.  Usually, this is an ‘oh-no’ point as the likelyhood is another batch of used and redundant envelopes will be heading for the bin covered in track layout sketches!  But on this occasion, there was a penny drop moment and an idea that maybe following a similar principal could work, using small 3’ x 1’ boards that could be packed away in a protective box.  But designed in such a way that at some point in the future, they could have ‘extra’ connecting boards added and be joined up to make a bigger layout.

 

Having joined the 2mm Association around two years ago, my thoughts also turned to a visit that the North Mercia Area Group, organised by Laurie Adams, had from Jerry Clifford (@queensquare) of this parish.  Jerry has to be in the top group of high class 2mm modellers and many will probably know of his Bath Queen Park layout that he is building or his Tucking Mill or Highbury Colliery layouts.  The visit showed off several buildings, as well as locomotive and rolling stock models for the Bath layout, and included a stunning model that has been built for him of a Midland Railway 2-4-0 outside framed locomotive, shown below.

 

IMG_1844.jpeg.7c7c3521475bdb6cfa84a94e463c610e.jpeg

Midland Railway 2-4-0 owned by Jerry Clifford for his Bath Queen Square layout. Picture by Marsh Lane

 

A couple of pictures from his visit provide a photographic interlude in this post, but also show how a compact Midland engine shed could be provided within a similar 3’ x 1’ space.  The work pictured is entirely Jerry's for his own layouts and all credit goes to him and is included here to a) show off his skilful modelling, and b) to demonstrate the kind of thing that could be achieved. 

 

IMG_1832.jpeg.cf3ef99fb0220889f4a0d49fe6e54f8f.jpeg

A suggestion of what could be achieved in a small space for a motive power depot.  Models and Bath MPD layout by Jerry Clifford.

 

My modelling aspirations

So, having taken the decision to progress this and see where it does, that is where I now am.  I have a bit of a fascination with the Midland Railway where pre-grouping is concerned, probably part of that being down to the fact that the company used smaller locos that in the main had no, or very little, complicated valve gear!  This certainly makes building (or conversion of RTR) to 2FS far easier.  I must admit, with a focus on realism I really am drawn to the finescale gauges, and for this project 2mm ticked all the boxes.  Ok, there would be an amount of kit and scratch building involved but more and more I have been developing an interest in ‘having a go’ in this area.

 

So that is the background for this blog, and what will hopefully become a series of layouts, that will include a main line terminal station - I love the early 1900s architecture and platform furniture - goods warehouse/yard and main line approach’s and possibly some form of engine shed when the locomotive fleet is built up.  As you can see, there is no shortage of ‘modules’ that could easily be connected together and work together in the future.

 

 

The plan going forward

I am coming to this with a blank canvas, there being no existing stock, so progress will be slow, and with the effects of the pandemic behind us, money will not be easily available to splash around, but in many respects, I think that helps to encourage the innovative and ingenuity aspects of how something can be built without resorting to expensive means or always ‘buying in’ things.

 

The first of the modules to be created will be Forge Gate Goods Warehouse, modelled on a Midland-style building, that will take a lot of incentive from Birmingham Lawley Street, Nottingham Goods and Sheffield Wicker freight depots.  My thought is that the two or three-story building will take up the full 3’ x 1’ board, with the inside track work being raised by 2mm to allow the board to be ‘set down into’ a bigger layout in the future.  One side of the building will be left off to allow the viewer to see the activity inside, and I have a few ideas for small scenarios and story scenes that could be depicted.  I still need to pour over the various editions of Midland Record that I have here, but inside I am thinking that there will be three pairs of sidings, a couple perhaps shorter than others, with wooden platforms between them for loading/offloading goods, and the offices that would have been at the rear will also be depicted.

 

For me, it forms an ideal first module, as I can hand build the track (using 2mm Association Easitrak) and there are no points involved!  Alongside the goods warehouse, a small two or three foot long traverser will be constructed to allow shunting movements to take place.  Longer term, the next module will probably depict the approach lines to the warehouse, and give the opportunity for point building, but first things first … I’ll get the goods warehouse and some wagons sorted out.  The initial stage will also give the opportunity to built and fit DG couplings and work out positioning of magnets within the shed, hopefully making use of the delayed action feature to reduce the number of magnets actually needed.

 

Loco wise, I am thinking that the purchase of a Graham Farish Fowler 4F (372-063) with Midland numbers might be a good first option, then remove the LMS branding from the cab side. I believe the design dates from the early 1910s, (Edit: although as pointed out in the comments further Class 4 designs were not built until 1917) so fits with the pre post-World War I/pre-Grouping period that I am thinking.  The question, which I need to look into, is whether it is an easy conversion to 2FS or whether I bite the bullet and scratch-build a chassis for it.  The latter is tempting as it is only a straight 0-6-0, with no complicated valve gear and other than the brake equipment, there is little under frame detail.  I have had an aspiration that if I could scratch-build my own chassis for locos, then I can ensure that the pick-ups, DCC fitment and running qualities are as good as I can make them, which paired with the running qualities of 2FS track work, should (in theory at least) make for a superb model.

 

 

Conclusion

So there we are, an introduction to what may be a series of working diorama’s with a bigger layout aim at the end of them.  If you are still reading and haven’t got bored or fallen asleep well done, you may get a bonus points award for getting this far!!  I hope anyone interested will follow the blog, I may keep the blog for the bigger ‘overview’ posts and create a thread for the day-to-day update posts, I have yet to decide.

 

I welcome all thoughts and comments, please do feel free to chip in!

 

Happy modelling!

 

Rich

Edited by MarshLane
Corrected name of Sheffield Goods Depot & period dates.

  • Like 19

26 Comments


Recommended Comments



  • RMweb Premium

This sounds very interesting. 

 

I imagine you have gone through the pages on both Lawley Street and Central Goods on Warwickshire Railways?

 

I hope you have also had a trawl through the Derby Registers and the Midland Railway Study Centre catalogue

 

I'm afraid I have to point out that although the first two Class 4 goods engines were built in 1911, it wasn't until 1917 that any more were built. But if you were to choose a post-Great War setting, you could have a much greater variety of wagons, thanks to the introduction of pooling during the war. This becomes evident when you start checking the dates of some of the photos.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold
1 hour ago, Compound2632 said:

This sounds very interesting. 

 

I imagine you have gone through the pages on both Lawley Street and Central Goods on Warwickshire Railways?

 

I hope you have also had a trawl through the Derby Registers and the Midland Railway Study Centre catalogue

 

I'm afraid I have to point out that although the first two Class 4 goods engines were built in 1911, it wasn't until 1917 that any more were built. But if you were to choose a post-Great War setting, you could have a much greater variety of wagons, thanks to the introduction of pooling during the war. This becomes evident when you start checking the dates of some of the photos.

 

Thanks. Yes I have spent a number of hours on the Warwickshire Railways website, but I must admit I didn't know about the Derby Registers - I am a member of the Midland Railway Society however, just didn't know it was there!  I have spent quite a few hours on the MR Study Centre catalogue looking at different aspects, and have downloaded copies of the plans/drawings for a couple of stations with the aim that they will provide some background info and a basis of approach for the terminal station board.

 

I still have quite a bit of research to do on things, but thanks for flagging up the dates. I knew about wagon pooling, but had not thought about why it was introduced, so did not realise that it came about as a result of WW1.  Moving to a date that is post-WW1 and pre-grouping definitely makes sense in terms of both the wagon variety that would have been around, as you have kindly suggested the locomotive dates.

 

A bit of time to be spent this Easter looking through those Derby Registers I think!

 

Rich

  • Like 2
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Hi Rich, very flattered that my Bath project has provided some inspiration. I too am a big fan of Mikkle and the Farthing layouts. Your project sounds excellent, particularly as you are plumping for pre-group Midland.

 

I selected my modelling period precisely for the reasons Stephen mentions above. I wanted pre-group and always loved the post war pictures of goods yards with wagons from all over the country so initially settled on 1922. Since then I have become a bit more flexible as favourites such as large boilered 7Fs, 2Ps and Jinties (Bagnalls) fall outside that date so have now gone with a rather fluid decade or so after WW1 - essentially till the end of the S&D blue period in 1930 although the vast majority of my Midland stuff remains pre 1923 with just a couple of 4Fs in the first LMS livery with the small panel on the cab side.

 

Regarding your comments about locos, the Farish 4F is a very straightforward conversion to 2FS. Association bearings and wheels can be dropped in with replacement rods - I think Izzy has done a detailed series of posts on his thread in the 2mm area. The Farish model is a beautiful runner if a little light in terms of haulage though this can be significantly improved with a weighted tender.

The beautiful 800 2-4-0 above was built for me by John Greenwood in exchange for doing a number of the buildings on Wadebridge, I really must get round to painting it this spring along with a few other locos that have spent far too long in bare metal!

 

Below is a crop from an Airofims picture of Bath showing the shed. The date is bang in my period at 1920 although I will again be using a bit of modellers license to expand the Stothert works across the road and onto the sports field behind the sidings full of wagons on the north side of the line as the real thing did in the early thirties - it makes a much better backdrop to the layout as I only have about three inches to play with here!

 

I shall follow your project with interest.

 

Jerry  

 

750727084_download(15).png.9f546c2f76a7865a4c83218219615ba6.png

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment

Rich,

As an EM modeller, mixed gauge GWR to boot, I think your plan and reasoning is excellent.  I have thought many times that if the n gauge offering 30 years ago was as good as it is now I’d have gone to 2mm rather than EM (although that would make scratching my broad gauge/mixed gauge itch a really difficult task pre 3D printing...)

 

I look forward to reading lots more....

 

Duncan

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Hi Rich, this sounds very exciting!

 

2FS Midland is clearly a winner for this approach, I can already picture it. You'll have a bit more room to play with than in 4mm, and fairly short stock too as you say. 

 

The main challenge I experience in design is having to balance everything - i.e. the individual layout/module has to be a consistent whole in it itself, but it also has to somehow fit within the greater scheme of things, conceptually, operationally and track-wise.  As I've started thinking more in modular terms myself, I'm finding that challenge increases, but I suppose it's part of the fun.

 

I like the sound of post WW1, not so often modelled. If you want to move back in time later, you could have a different period emphasis for the different modules as you move along, but that again depends on how integrated you want it all to be.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold
1 hour ago, queensquare said:

I selected my modelling period precisely for the reasons Stephen mentions above. I wanted pre-group and always loved the post war pictures of goods yards with wagons from all over the country so initially settled on 1922.

 

Regarding your comments about locos, the Farish 4F is a very straightforward conversion to 2FS. Association bearings and wheels can be dropped in with replacement rods - I think Izzy has done a detailed series of posts on his thread in the 2mm area. The Farish model is a beautiful runner if a little light in terms of haulage though this can be significantly improved with a weighted tender.

 

The beautiful 800 2-4-0 above was built for me by John Greenwood in exchange for doing a number of the buildings on Wadebridge, I really must get round to painting it this spring along with a few other locos that have spent far too long in bare metal!

 

I shall follow your project with interest.

 

Jerry  

 

Jerry,

Equally flattered that you have taken the time and trouble to comment, many thanks. Yes I think pushing the time period to the 1918-1922 time period will provide a better variety, while still keeping with the late 19th/early 20th century architecture. The info on the 4F conversion is interesting, I thought I’d read somewhere about a conversion, thanks to your comment ive found the second thread that @Izzy did, but still trying to discover the first one again!

 

I now recall you saying about the ‘800’ being built by John Greenwood. While I agree it needs painting, the stunning construction seems too good to hide!
 

I am expecting to be at the Association’s Derby event next year with Laurie, so look forward to seeing you again.

 

1 hour ago, drduncan said:

As an EM modeller, mixed gauge GWR to boot, I think your plan and reasoning is excellent.  I have thought many times that if the n gauge offering 30 years ago was as good as it is now I’d have gone to 2mm rather than EM (although that would make scratching my broad gauge/mixed gauge itch a really difficult task pre 3D printing...)


Hi Duncan, many thanks. Please don’t go putting ideas in my head, it’s dangerous!! Thanks for the comment however. I dabbled in modern image N gauge in my early teens and really couldn’t believe how much it had changed, detailing wise, when I returned back 30 years later ... not to mention the prices!!

 

Good to have you along.

 

Rich
 

  • Like 1
Link to comment

My son has an n gauge layout in order to keep clear water between daddy’s trains and teddy’s trains.... it hasn’t worked....

 

He was entranced by John Greenwood’s north Cornwall layout at Jerry’s show and complains constantly that his model railway isn’t a proper one (ie not up to exhibition standard). He was 7 last week.  
 

Still it might give me an excuse to do Keyham in 2mm - it will never fit in the space available in 4mm (I was thinking Ivybridge and then Saltash in 2mm but others have got there first ....).

D

  • Like 3
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold
35 minutes ago, Mikkel said:

Hi Rich, this sounds very exciting!

 

2FS Midland is clearly a winner for this approach, I can already picture it. You'll have a bit more room to play with than in 4mm, and fairly short stock too as you say. 

 

The main challenge I experience in design is having to balance everything - i.e. the individual layout/module has to be a consistent whole in it itself, but it also has to somehow fit within the greater scheme of things, conceptually, operationally and track-wise.  As I've started thinking more in modular terms myself, I'm finding that challenge increases, but I suppose it's part of the fun.

 

I like the sound of post WW1, not so often modelled. If you want to move back in time later, you could have a different period emphasis for the different modules as you move along, but that again depends on how integrated you want it all to be.


Thanks Mikkel, 

I think 2FS (and 2mm in general) has a quandary for some modellers, including me. It’s small enough to be able to do justice to an area in a reasonable space, but is it too small for detailing and achieving a good end result on a larger project. Your modular concept gets round this wonderfully, as it starts small completing each section before moving forwards.

 

I agree that finding a balance across the modules will be a big consideration. I have a ‘grand plan’ in my mind as to how I’d like it to come together ... if I only I could print out the picture in my mind... just don’t ask where the printers USB plug goes!!

 

The idea of potentially different time periods is an interesting one. Although from a loco point of view, I think I am going to *try* and be good and stick to one period in order to at least give me enough locos for the motive power depot, when I get to that one!

 

Rich

  • Like 1
Link to comment

As you've mentioned Mid Rly Engine Sheds.....
I presume there's a copy of the track plan for Worcester Mid Rly Engine Shed at Worcester,

This is what I copied off a 1:500 O.S. plan some 50+ years ago.
Just adding an idea to the mix.
 

Worcester Mid Loco Shed #1.jpg

Worcester Mid Loco Shed #2.jpg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold
18 minutes ago, drduncan said:

My son has an n gauge layout in order to keep clear water between daddy’s trains and teddy’s trains.... it hasn’t worked....

 

He was entranced by John Greenwood’s north Cornwall layout at Jerry’s show and complains constantly that his model railway isn’t a proper one (ie not up to exhibition standard). He was 7 last week.  
 

Still it might give me an excuse to do Keyham in 2mm - it will never fit in the space available in 4mm (I was thinking Ivybridge and then Saltash in 2mm but others have got there first ....).

D


Sound like an exhibition layout creator in the making ... you’ve done well!
 

Keyham would be interesting. I always thought that Devonport in Plymouth would make an interest GWR layout, especially with the small goods yard at the eastern end. 

Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold
6 minutes ago, Penlan said:

As you've mentioned Mid Rly Engine Sheds.....
I presume there's a copy of the track plan for Worcester Mid Rly Engine Shed at Worcester,

This is what I copied off a 1:500 O.S. plan some 50+ years ago.
Just adding an idea to the mix.

 


Hi @Penlan,

Cheers. That’s an interesting thought. Not too big, but not exactly compact either. Ive added it to my list of potential thoughts for that module! Took me a little bit of time to find it below Shrub Hill station on the NLS historical maps. Thanks for posting it.

 

Rich

Link to comment

Oooh, Devonport.  Yes an excellent minimum space mainline station!

 

I’ll do Devonport you do Keyham and Camels head viaduct and we’ll join them together... EM wasn’t it?

 

D

  • Funny 2
Link to comment

Worcester Shrub Hill was a Joint Mid. GWR station, as staff vacancies became available they appointed them alternatively to each Company. I don't seem to have saved the date of the 1:500 series map, but I would have thought pre 1920.  It was tucked away in some old cabinets in the City Engineers Office when I started there in 1972.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold
10 hours ago, Penlan said:

As you've mentioned Mid Rly Engine Sheds.....
I presume there's a copy of the track plan for Worcester Mid Rly Engine Shed at Worcester,

This is what I copied off a 1:500 O.S. plan some 50+ years ago.
Just adding an idea to the mix.

 

I appreciate this is deviating from the Goods Warehouse that will be the first module, but one of the other Midland Shed's that I had on the radar as a possible basis for this fictional location, is Rowsley.  Nice feature on it in one of the Midland Record editions I have and the buildings look nice from a modelling point of view.  The track layout is also interesting, and not too spread out.

Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium
1 minute ago, MarshLane said:

one of the other Midland Shed's that I had on the radar as a possible basis for this fictional location, is Rowsley. 

 

Old or new shed? Do you have G. Waite and L. Knighton, Rowsley: a rural railway centre (Midland Railway Society, 2003)?

Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold
52 minutes ago, Compound2632 said:

 

Old or new shed? Do you have G. Waite and L. Knighton, Rowsley: a rural railway centre (Midland Railway Society, 2003)?

 

Ah! Do you know I was just sat downstairs with a cup of tea pondering things and it occurred to me that the shed at the London end of the yard wasn't built until the mid-late 1920s, so the buildings could be a different style entirely.  Having just popped on to edit the post, as ever Stephen, you've beaten me to it!  No I haven't got that book, I have Through Limestone Hills by Bill Hudson and A N Other about the Midland in that area, but not the MRS book on Rowsley.  However, it was the new shed that I was thinking of.  Would the building style / operational detail have changed much from 5-10 years previously?

 

Rich

Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium
23 minutes ago, MarshLane said:

However, it was the new shed that I was thinking of.  Would the building style / operational detail have changed much from 5-10 years previously?

 

The new shed was very much in the style of Midland straight sheds built in the 1880s/90s - Hellifield, Ilkley, Keighley, Mansfield, and on the grand scale, Westhouses (1890) and Sheffield Millhouses (1901) - but with rather plainer brickwork and some false economies such as the use of old rails for the rafters. The Metcalfe two-road engine shed is (or was*) a pretty good representation of this style, certainly in 00. Another useful book to get hold of second hand: C. Hawkins and G. Reeve, LMS Engine Sheds Vol. 2 - The Midland Railway (Wild Swan, 1981).

 

*It's had a make-over in the last couple of years - it's become ever so slightly twee to appeal to GWR types.

 

Midland Railway Study Centre Item 23473. (And others.)

Edited by Compound2632
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Thanks Steven,

I have filed the plan of Ilkley away for future reference. I do like the standardisation that the MR brought to the network. I did think about looking at a roundhouse style, but concluded that it would take up too much space, and to be really useful, in the grand scheme it needs to be open on one side to allow the viewer to see the activity inside, and that starts to take the practicality of a round building away. I’ll certainly look for that book thanks.

 

I’ve spent an enjoyable hour pouring over the Midland Record edition of Nottingham Goods and Sheffield Wicker this evening, so have a bit more idea of what the goods warehouse will be modelled like. I’ll try and get a blog post up with some scale drawings/plans on later this week.

 

Rich

  • Like 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold
9 hours ago, Compound2632 said:

it's become ever so slightly twee to appeal to GWR types

 

You thought you could slip that in unnoticed, didn't you? Filed and remembered! 

 

:D

 

  • Funny 2
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold
Quote

The first of the modules to be created will be Forge Gate Goods Warehouse, modelled on a Midland-style building, that will take a lot of incentive from Birmingham Lawley Street, Nottingham Goods and Sheffield Wicker freight depots

 

Just had a look at photos of some of these online. You'll be needing one or two horse drawn vehicles. Should make for an interesting distraction when you tire of the big projects.

 

I like the look of Nottingham Goods, there's a nice 4mm model by Dave Barrett  here: https://www.scalefour.org/layouts/exhibnottingham.html

  • Agree 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold
1 hour ago, Mikkel said:

 

Just had a look at photos of some of these online. You'll be needing one or two horse drawn vehicles. Should make for an interesting distraction when you tire of the big projects.

 

I like the look of Nottingham Goods, there's a nice 4mm model by Dave Barrett  here: https://www.scalefour.org/layouts/exhibnottingham.html


Thanks Mikkel,

I hadn’t seen or heard of that layout before. Superbly done. 
 

Yes several horse drawn vehicles will be on the hit list, so I’ll have a search around the usual subjects, but some may need scratchbuilding I suspect. Now about a working horse that Dave Barrett suggested ...... :scratch_one-s_head_mini:

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Rich,

Another 2FS project that I will follow with great interest. I must admit that Mikkel’s approach to “eating an elephant” has much to commend it, indeed I thought long and hard about a DJLC entry along those lines but decided that the size allowed was just to restrictive for me. Good luck though!

Ian

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold
16 minutes ago, Ian Smith said:

Rich,

Another 2FS project that I will follow with great interest. I must admit that Mikkel’s approach to “eating an elephant” has much to commend it, indeed I thought long and hard about a DJLC entry along those lines but decided that the size allowed was just to restrictive for me. Good luck though!

Ian

 

Hi Ian,

Thanks, nice to have you along.  Yes, I have kept revisiting the DJLC idea with a view to creating something, but end up rejecting it each time for the same reason as you!  If I can get 25% of the quality you have achieved with Modbury - which is wonderful by the way - I shall be very happy!

 

Rich

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment

I agree that @Mikkel's methods make an excellent starting point - his small layouts have provided me with much inspiration.  I feel that my eyesight and general clumsiness are not up to 2 mm modelling but I'm amazed to see what is now being produced in this scale.  I met Julia Adams at some exhibitions and was most impressed by her modelling technique.  I shall follow your developments with interest :)

 

Mike

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...