Jump to content
 

Bridge clearance in rural goods yard


MoonMonkey

876 views

Hello all, it's been a while as I haven't much to ask or mention.  Now I'm making a little progress, I would be grateful though for some advice on bridge clearances in goods yards.  I have a small rural goods yard alongside a mainline.  I'm wondering about using the smaller arch to run a siding through.  This is to give the illusion of a bigger yard with more on the other side of the bridge (the model bridge being a scenic break, as the layout ends here, so no actual model track extension).  I know that there were occurances of yards extending beyond a bridge from google images, layouts in mags etc.  I  also found on this website the 'official' cleances for stations, running lines, etc.  

However, the clearances of the small arch are tight.  I therefore wonder if its worth just lumping it with short sidings, or having the line go through the arch.  Because its to create an illusion of space and reality, if the clearances for rolling stock are ridiculously small and unrealistic, then there seems little point in doing it.  Any thoughts would be gratefully received, and may be of use to others as well.   

I attach some photos of the 2 options, using an SR van as a visual guide.  
 

CIMG3576.JPG

CIMG3577.JPG

CIMG3578.JPG

  • Like 2

29 Comments


Recommended Comments



On 24/08/2021 at 16:09, JimC said:

Thanks for the pointer to these signs.  I ordered some and finally got them onto the bridge!... Nice products, and even better - they come ready coloured.  This was great as they are delivered better than I could paint them.  I also got a pack of 'beware of the trains' signs which are also ready-finished, one of which is just inside the arch.   I did give them a bit of weathering powder/spray varnish.  No link to supplier (Scale Model Scenery), just a happy customer!  (ps, yes, I know it isn't a GWR loco, it was just here when I took the photo!!!)    

CIMG3663.JPG

  • Like 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold
On 25/08/2021 at 09:40, Dickon said:

Edit: The minimum size was 300mm square.

That sounds about right and although I've seen plenty of them in real life when at work, I don't think I've ever seen one more than about a foot square (so 300mm is about right).

 

Your tiny arch seems to be something that was originally built for another purpose and was subsequently used for railway purposes when the yard etc. expanded.

 

Your 'Engines must not pass this point' sign notwithstanding, you should still have a Limited Clearance sign in place on one of the vertical faces adjacent to the small arch.

 

Edited by Captain Kernow
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to comment

That red/white check sign looks to be BR though judging by the text font and general style. The OP needs something GWR era.  There were surely a good number of such restricted structures, albeit more height than width: someone must be able to dig up an example. And if no-one can find an example - then no-one is in a position to show the current setup is incorrect!

I just had a browse through a railwayana site, and while they had a number of those BR limited clearance squares, I didn't succeed in finding anything that was any earlier. And its not as if having to add an additional sign will be a great disaster should evidence ever turn up. There were a few "railway company locomotives must not  pass this point" which presumably are also private sidings. But for my money that sign looks neat.

Edited by JimC
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...