Jump to content
 

A click-on scenic extension


Mikkel

4,748 views


I’ve made a detachable scenic extension for The Stables, using magnets. With this, the layout is more or less complete.

 

 

001.jpg.3525e6985fa9d67ba0db16672da49da2.jpg

 

The extension module was knocked up from 10 mm foamboard. The aim was to portray a tree-lined street at the back of the layout. It had to be detachable so as to facilitate storage in our small flat.

 

 

002.jpg.38e1a0080f1d7b566ab1714adaf20a9d.jpg

 

The pavements were made in my usual way, flagstones lined out in pencil and later scribed with a round-nosed  awl.

 

 

003.jpg.e1acf0d2be7fd0a4d5c0c4eedc2ff802.jpg

 

A black wash for weathering. Afterwards I stood the strips on the side to avoid unsightly puddles forming. 

 

 

005.jpg.2c2c06415d7d6298d6f3810882f0001e.jpg

 

For the road itself I used a base of thin plasticard, curved to emulate the camber and with packing along the centerline (crown) for support. The top layer is painted sanding paper (grain 120), dusted with weathering pigments when dry.

 

 

007B.jpg.73beae01736cba23f3b0431e301e8d2c.jpg

 

Vacuum formed retaining walls from Southeastern Finecast. I’ve used these on all four Farthing layouts, as a visual leitmotif. The brick detail is variable but you get quick results and for me they work OK at the back. 

 

 

006.jpg.6817efbc507fb7d9b926ca0185f55db3.jpg

 

The trees were made using a combo of techniques, as described in an earlier post

 

 

007.jpg.1ecc991e356472df9ed011cb72ee9650.jpg

 

I made the trees a push fit, as I may want to replace them later. I find that masking tape works well as a way to adjust thickness on larger inserts. 

 

 

007B2.jpg.af98be144804376e1001ce8c36925d30.jpg

 

GWR standard spear fencing from Ratio.

 

 

 

As as aside, this 8 second video shows the fence at the front of the layout fitted with magnets. It allows easy track cleaning, photography and storage.

 

 

007C.jpg.cddd7a98cc33f4fd9f92a9b3472f3bf6.jpg

 

These are the little critters, with a toothpick for size. They can hold 130 grams each. Thanks to Dave for introducing me to the weird and wonderful world of magnets!

 

009.jpg.d6a28f1c14dba1cdf88f352adea431eb.jpg

Anyway, back to the scenic extension. I found some posters from the 1901-1903 period, and scaled them down. Houdini toured Britain in 1903.

 

 

010.jpg.61469d8dd36bf67d69a37b3921a72cab.jpg

 

In retrospect, I wonder if the neat Edwardians stuck posters directly to walls. Or were they exclusively mounted on backboards and hoardings?

 

 

008.jpg.1b82013ffdd38a0e2b2f56fb76dcd61a.jpg

 

So that was the scenic part of the job, a sort of "3D backscene". In principle, the same module could be used on different layouts. In order to attach it to the main layout, I experimented with magnets again. 

 

 

012.jpg.b7c02fd2cdbe089f361e4c1a98a0acd1.jpg

 

I first tried these neodymium magnets, capable of holding 2 kgs each, but they were too powerful. I could hardly get them apart and was worried that they would mess with my loco- and point motors (or is that not an issue?). 

 

 

13.jpg.12fee0e4f8e08694f90346c7569e9f23.jpg

 

Instead I opted for some less powerful S&W uncoupling magnets. Cheaper magnets of the same strength can no doubt be sourced, but I happened to have a surplus and knew that these were safe for my motors. 

 

 

14.jpg.70c8a6fae41b22316db1b0b7bd71e398.jpg

 

I also fitted alignment dowels in order to reduce the downward pull of the module.  

 

 

DSCN0486e_12002.jpg.a59bfbe36400394ded2f2749e6900d61.jpg

 

After experiments, I found that a mix of  PVA and ultra-fine Polyfilla held the magnets and dowels surprisingly well in the foamboard that I use.

 

 

016.jpg.9f9bab67112e63ab2547aa915b68a4e7.jpg

 

The extension then simply clicks on to the layout.

 

 

 

 

Another short video clip, showing the extension being clicked on.

 

 

18.jpg.518b79e90a2a7f0ab4e3fea83acd973b.jpg

 

The extension sits tight and “floats” with no supports. Obviosuly, that works because the module is narrow and light (650 grams) and is used at the rear of my desk where no one can lean on it. Actual layout modules would need supporting legs.

 

 

019.jpg.4833bbd2ba9ba9a9f0dc5f2fdeedb6d8.jpg

 

Layout and two-level traverser on my desk. Further layout modules are being planned, and I'm thinking magnets can be a way to join them.

 

So "The Stables" is now more or less complete.  To celebrate, here's a selection of photos. A little slice of Farthing in a Copenhagen flat :)

 

020.jpg.d81f2ef1d96196055095b762f40620ce.jpg

 

 

20B.jpg.6f56e85f8d7e47a30095cf84837fb0a8.jpg

 

 

021.jpg.9d200fc344f55db35bfadbac4213c9a2.jpg

 

 

022.jpg.45e7efa50aa91b8af5a468626a6aed89.jpg

 

 

23.jpg.93f83d7ff3e49d6a2ecdf67dfe466bdc.jpg

 

 

024.jpg.217513abdd432c71b1afc128870cc980.jpg

 

 

025.jpg.a557ac262b922e4485562205c41882c9.jpg

 

 

 

026.jpg.cdf00e52f9a337220211592c6d8a1cb6.jpg

 

 

 

027C_1200.jpg.80a9eef725bdeb9e8a425c7b2e9f55f1.jpg

 

 

028.jpg.b97055eb22d5cce15fb5eb4470f56d28.jpg

 

Edited by Mikkel

  • Like 21
  • Informative/Useful 1
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
  • Craftsmanship/clever 37
  • Round of applause 11

85 Comments


Recommended Comments



Very good idea with the magnets, especially for small details like the fence.  Also the brick arches look very realistic with the weathering.  Great stuff, as always.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Hi Mikkel,

 

I've really enjoyed reading your post and watching your videos! Such a clever idea: I really like it. 

 

The scene just looks beautiful.

 

All the best,

 

Nick.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Many thanks Bill and Nick, glad you like it.

 

Looking at the photos I think the fencing needs some weathering. It's rather stark and black. I considered low walls instead, which would have been pleasing from some angles. But that would also have been rather forbidding, and the fencing has a nice "filter" effect as per Reading's Vastern Rd yard.

 

image.png.125066c8711b9c032816920a748f1960.png

  • Like 10
Link to comment
41 minutes ago, Mikkel said:

..............the fencing has a nice "filter" effect as per Reading's Vastern Rd yard.

 

 

I agree.  I like the line of huts with one marked 'GWR Foreman's Office'.  I have a similar hut in the yard at North Leigh, so may label it in the same way!

 

I wonder what the two guys by the gate are saying?  "Right, Bert, you watch that office, while I look if there's owt worth nicking from these wagons"

  • Like 4
Link to comment

 

22 hours ago, Mikkel said:

I think the fencing needs some weathering. It's rather stark and black.

 

One thought: Is it too late to change the colour of the fence to stone?  

  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 2
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium
1 hour ago, richbrummitt said:

One thought: Is it too late to change the colour of the fence to stone?  

 

That Vastern Road fence looks too dark to be stone, to me. But it does show that @Mikkel's fence could do with a bit of bashing about - it needs to lean over in a few places.

 

But I do find that this extra module gives the complete scene a magnetic personality.

  • Like 2
Link to comment

There is a useful guide to wrought iron and cast iron architectural metalwork, in particular, railings in this link to Islington Council https://planning.islington.gov.uk/NorthgatePublicDocs/00392652.pdf.  The article summarises the history of wrought/cast iron railings (etc) and points out that it is only in the post war period that railings were predominantly painted black: the Victorians mostly painted railings green but dark blue, red and chocolate brown ironwork was also popular.  The GWR had its own opinions on a satisfactory colour for railings but I tend to agree with Compound 2632 that the Vastern Road lot look darker than either of the GWR's preferred stone colours, but then again colour and B & W photos.....

 

This is also worth a look for those interested in architectural metalwork and its conservation https://historicengland.org.uk/images-books/publications/metals-conservation/metals-marketing-spreads.

 

Kit PW

  • Informative/Useful 2
  • Interesting/Thought-provoking 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Fantastic, Mikkel! I've wanted to do something like this and you've proved it can work. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
5 hours ago, Compound2632 said:

 

That Vastern Road fence looks too dark to be stone, to me. But it does show that @Mikkel's fence could do with a bit of bashing about - it needs to lean over in a few places.

 

 

I spent a while considering where the sun might be and how shaded the side we are viewing was. It probably is black. The book on GWR structure colours, by Richard North (GWSG) covers the period 1912-1947 and tells us that spear fencing likely to be interacted with by the public, as here, was varnished black or tarred. However it also tells us that stone tint no.2 was also in use at the beginning of the period covered. Who is to say that at Farthing they used stone tint 3 or 4! There was local variation on windows and valences.  

  • Like 2
  • Informative/Useful 2
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium
3 minutes ago, richbrummitt said:

I spent a while considering where the sun might be and how shaded the side we are viewing was. 

 

The photographer is standing in Caversham Road, which runs NNE - SSW at the western end of the yard; the camera is facing roughly SSE. The large building in the background is the GWR Signal Works.

 

Here in Earley, the first occupant of the house we've lived in for the last 20 years, built in 1964, gave his occupation as "Signal Engineer".

  • Like 3
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold
On 28/10/2021 at 14:02, MikeOxon said:

I agree.  I like the line of huts with one marked 'GWR Foreman's Office'.  I have a similar hut in the yard at North Leigh, so may label it in the same way!

 

I wonder what the two guys by the gate are saying?  "Right, Bert, you watch that office, while I look if there's owt worth nicking from these wagons"

 

They are nice little structures, aren't they? The small wooden offices seen in some larger goods yards are rarely described in the GWR literature. I may have shown these two before, at Bristol Temple Meads. One of them was supposed to go in front of the stable block, but sometimes less is more. The cartage office is still on my build list, just need to find the right spot for it.

 

IMG_20200401_080255975_HDR.jpg.8a331375166579b9dcf1d6d0c7ee343c.jpg

  • Like 7
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Interesting information and thoughts about the colour of fencing, many thanks. My understanding was that GWR spear fencing was black in goods yards, but I need to check up on the source. 

 

This is Leamington, but that would be the station area I think:

 

199378223_s-l1600(1).jpg.c04cc9f37995c4ce47e20309f330da79.jpg

 

  • Like 7
Link to comment
57 minutes ago, Mikkel said:

 

.... I may have shown these two before, at Bristol Temple Meads. ....

 

IMG_20200401_080255975_HDR.jpg.8a331375166579b9dcf1d6d0c7ee343c.jpg

 

The steel protection bars around the huts look surprisingly like modern crash barriers!

  • Like 2
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium
10 minutes ago, MikeOxon said:

The steel protection bars around the huts look surprisingly like modern crash barriers!

 

They look to be made of old rail - so rather lacking in the cushioning effect of a modern crash barrier!

  • Agree 2
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium

Low walls with iron fencing on top were very common up here Mikkel, like those in the picture of Leamington, though generally stone rather than brick. 

 

Some brilliant adverts in the background too. If those popped up on RMweb folk would be copying them not complaining ..... 

 

 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium
11 minutes ago, Mikkel said:

The bridge also features (or rather is being replaced, I think?) in another scene that would make an equally interesting diorama: 

 

The bridge being replaced in that photo is the massive skew bridge over High Street and Clement Street. (Still there, though the LNWR bridge on the left is long gone, only the approach viaducts remain.) I think the bridge in the photo with the poster hording is the smaller one over Lower Avenue, at the east end of the station. OS 25" map.

 

Purely on the condition of the Dean Goods in each photo, the High Street bridge photo is a few years earlier than the Lower Avenue bridge photo!

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium
Just now, MikeOxon said:

Any thoughts on the rather strange-looking covered van on the left of the photo?

 

The photo appears in J.H. Lewis et al., All About GWR Iron Minks (HMRS, 1980) where it is identified as Compressor Van No. 14938. (Incidentally the photo is there dated 1907, which is a bit later than I though.) A December 1903 portrait of the vehicle itself, when newly turned-out, is also given. It started life in 1856 as a sort of primordial iron mink, with roof door (removed in 1879) and big 3'4.5" wheels; as such it was condemned in August 1903, at 47 years; in its rebuilt form it lasted until 1937. Another old van of the same type was converted to a Tunnel Whitewash Van in March 1903, withdrawn 1926. There don't seem to be any photos of tunnels being whitewashed...

  • Like 1
  • Informative/Useful 2
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium

Ingenious solution to add extra depth - an idea I’m going to pinch in the future.  Those pics and vids are brilliant.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
On 29/10/2021 at 23:01, Compound2632 said:
On 29/10/2021 at 22:50, MikeOxon said:

The steel protection bars around the huts look surprisingly like modern crash barriers!

 

They look to be made of old rail - so rather lacking in the cushioning effect of a modern crash barrier!


a walking pace collision between a horse drawn cart and a building would be bad for the building and the cart (and possibly the horse), if it were heavily laden, but the energy dissipated doesn’t compare with a half-wit-controlled GTi ploughing into something solid from an illegal velocity…

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1
Link to comment
13 hours ago, Compound2632 said:

 

The photo appears in J.H. Lewis et al., All About GWR Iron Minks (HMRS, 1980) .....

Many thanks for the info.  Once I knew what it was, I found a good photo and description at:

https://www.warwickshirerailways.com/misc/misc_equip202.htm

The extra height was required to house a vertical steam boiler and this powered a small steam engine that drove an air compressor. The boiler's chimney could be removed when not required. Multiple connections for pneumatic tools were available from the pipework..

  • Like 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium
1 hour ago, MikeOxon said:

Many thanks for the info.  Once I knew what it was, I found a good photo and description at:

https://www.warwickshirerailways.com/misc/misc_equip202.htm

 

That's the photo in All About.

 

1 hour ago, Michael Hodgson said:

Would that be within the loading gauge (with chimney stowed of course)?

 

Don't be deceived; these early covered goods wagons weren't very tall. Here's another Leamington photo:

 

lnwrlave4062a.jpg

 

[Embedded link to Warwickshire Railways photo ref. lnwrave4062a.]

 

See how much shorter these iron minks are than the adjacent NE van; the early proto-iron minks were even shorter.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Yes, they were small even when compared to other contemporary vans - this is an 1885 LSWR 10 ton sliding door van:

 

image.png.f94ebb6a3c46fe0acfa425375a98f7ed.png

 

Edited by Mikkel
  • Like 3
  • Craftsmanship/clever 2
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...