Jump to content
 

3 plank Open in GWR red


Mikkel

7,136 views

The whitemetal wagon kits from David Geen have tempted me for many years, so I thought it was time I gave them a go.

 

P2286143.jpg.b985f6d04a2d6af140829d771b0b3390.jpg

 

I began with this round-ended 3-planker of 1881 vintage, for use in my “out of period” running sessions.

 

 

P2156125.jpg.ec4a58c551e7dc85911656ca9138f1a7.jpg

 

The good stuff! Nothing like a bit of research to start off a new kit. The round ends were not long-lived on the 3-plankers. From 1883 the GWR introduced square ends, and many of the existing round-ended wagons appear to have been cut down to square ends within a short period. Perhaps to allow for extended loads? Or possibly an early EU regulation smile.gif.

 

 

P2156133.jpg.39a10f360d9488d7d1a259180d2648ff.jpg

 

The parts are nice and reasonably crisp. Some had flash but it was easily removed.

 

 

P2186111.jpg.c2598b7e2f60881fd65be18af1b361d2.jpg

 

The kit was built using Araldite. All very old school but I find it less stressful than soldering when it comes to whitemetal. Which says more about my soldering skills than anything else! I added wheels from Alan Gibson, running in Romford pinpoint bearings.

 

 

P2186113.jpg.9858ba6af2ccd48ad0051578520ad968.jpg

 

I rarely regret being an OO modeller, but this is one of those occasions when the gauge issue raises it’s ugly head. That's no fault of the kit, though, but of the gauge! No doubt I will soon have forgotten all about it and go back into the usual state of denial wink.gif.

 

 

P2286150.jpg.c4a728fa9ac8c3ce7758879440cd731a.jpg

 

I went for a slightly worn look. We tend to imagine Victorian liveries as completely spotless, but I can't bring myself to believe that it was really like that at all times and in every case. The 3-plankers were originally 9-ton wagons, although those that retained grease axleboxes were downgraded to 8 tons by the 1900s.

 

 

P2286171.jpg.1dfbfdc1c4ffdbd8d2584300037b062b.jpg

 

The wagon on "The bay". There is still some debate over the exact period of the red wagon livery. 

 

 

P2156110.jpg.5f45ab00f2b57c8739b224beab7bdc5c.jpg

 

This was a straightforward and enjoyable build. A square-ended version has also been purchased, for future use on "The depot" within my more normal 1900s timeframe.

  • Like 15

44 Comments


Recommended Comments



  • RMweb Gold

Just found this postcard on a site that BG John pointed out. It has previously been captioned as dated 1909 on a Wiltshire local studies website. The wagon colours may of course be fanciful - but I'm posting the link here for future reference.

 

pos8779.jpg.d971408831fa311411a2107814c459a7.jpg

 

box_picP18333.jpg.a7b5c13804c7b67209b0d91039edfaa3.jpg

 

EDIT:

 

A few notes from a discussion abouth this with Miss P and Nick:

 

* The wagons appear to be 2-plankers, and the front one has dumb buffers. They don't seem to be GWR engineering wagons, as these appear dark/black in contemporary photos.

 

* The wagons may not be GWR. They could well be contractor's wagons or - even more likely - Bath stone wagons (common in that area). The dumb buffers also suggest this. This website has photos of stone wagons from neaby Middlehill station that appear to be very similar/identical: http://www.choghole.co.uk/PHOTOGRAPHSOLD.htm (see "Wharfs").

 

* The colouring of the wagons in the postcard may be false. The colourist may have got it wrong, or the colour rendering from scanning/digitally enhancing the photo may have changed the original shade. However, the colours of the lineside structures appear plausible for the GWR.

 

* If the wagons are GWR and the colour and 1909 date is correct, it suggests that GWR red on wagons could still be seen in 1909. If GWR red ended in 1904, it is not unlikely some would still exist in that colour. Or the colour might even still be painted at that date. See: http://www.gwr.org.uk/liverieswagonred.html

 

The next step would be to examine whether there were red PO stone wagons in the area.

 

But so far it does look more likely that they are stone wagons, not GWR. 

 

Thanks to Nick and Miss P for their insights!

Edited by Mikkel
  • Like 2
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium
On 02/03/2011 at 15:03, SteveBedding said:

.....they also reverted to a 'reddish-brown' in 1942 as an austerity measure.

 

Dear All,

 

Just been re-reading this particular blog entry (whilst reclining on a sun lounger in Malta and enjoying a pint of Cisk :D), and picked up on this comment from SteveBedding - I'd never heard of this wartime austerity red, and would be fascinated to know more.

 

Has it been discussed here on RMWeb? I've not managed to find anything (yet).

 

All the best,

 

Mark

 

Edit - I've found brief mention of this livery on GWR.org, which was probably the same shade as contemporary coach repaints.....which was what?

Edited by 2996 Victor
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium

Hi Mikkel,

 

I had missed the link, so a big thank you for including it!

The colour of the coach is a somewhat muddy lake, isn't it? One might almost say it's "red oxide primer with a coat of varnish".

 

It's interesting from my perspective as a couple of wagons finished thus would make for intriguing variety on my planned counterpoint 1950s layout.

 

Pondering the ins and outs of such a thorny issue over a cool beer is what life should be all about, in my humble opinion! Now, where's the waiter.....:D

 

All the best,

 

Mark

  • Like 2
Link to comment

Two more pics (the first of which was my original gwr.org reference before discovering the above wiki pic):

 

7313 Didcot Feb 2009

 

 

GWR Collett Composite corridor 7313 Didcot

 

A deep red oxide with a slap of varnish describes it very well. (There is negligible blue in the colour, cf maroon, which has a significant blue content.) 

 

Edit: I've subsequently re-instated/added the urls for the above pics in the gwr.org livery page.

 

Edited by Miss Prism
  • Informative/Useful 4
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

Edit: Should be fixed now. 

 

Edited by Mikkel
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium
On 21/08/2019 at 17:26, Miss Prism said:

Two more pics (the first of which was my original gwr.org reference before discovering the above wiki pic):

 

7313 Didcot Feb 2009

 

 

GWR Collett Composite corridor 7313 Didcot

 

A deep red oxide with a slap of varnish describes it very well. (There is negligible blue in the colour, cf maroon, which has a significant blue content.) 

 

Edit: I've subsequently re-instated/added the urls for the above pics in the gwr.org livery page.

 

 

Thanks for adding these - they definitely show it as being a different shade to previous GWR and subsequent BR colours.

 

Apropos wagons, the passage on GWR.org says that open wagons built at that time were "unpainted", which presumably refers only to the wagons' sheets. So equally presumably, ironwork was (all?) painted in austerity red.

 

Please forgive me, as I don't currently have access to Atkins et al, but we're there any covered vans built concurrently, and if so what was painted and what wasn't?

 

I begin to think this needs it's own thread?

 

All the best,

 

Mark

Link to comment
6 minutes ago, 2996 Victor said:

Apropos wagons, the passage on GWR.org says that open wagons built at that time were "unpainted", which presumably refers only to the wagons' sheets. So equally presumably, ironwork was (all?) painted in austerity red.

 

It says new opens probably only received patches of red-brown for markings. Not sure about ironwork - black would be the most obvious, but I've never seen a pic of the treatment given to wagons built between 1942-5, and remember that only new-build was affected (so O30 and O38 and V34 and V35, for opens and Minks), and there is nothing to say that grey was discontinued. It's probably a case of whatever pot of paint was handy.

 

I think it very unlikely existing wagons were repainted in WWII.

 

  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Premium
On 22/08/2019 at 22:52, Miss Prism said:

 

It says new opens probably only received patches of red-brown for markings. Not sure about ironwork - black would be the most obvious, but I've never seen a pic of the treatment given to wagons built between 1942-5, and remember that only new-build was affected (so O30 and O38 and V34 and V35, for opens and Minks), and there is nothing to say that grey was discontinued. It's probably a case of whatever pot of paint was handy.

 

I think it very unlikely existing wagons were repainted in WWII.

 

 

Many thanks - agreed about new-build vehicles only being likely candidates. Was not O30 the all-steel diagram?

 

If you'll forgive me for quoting the GWR.org passage verbatim, it says in full:

 

"In the latter part of WWII, new goods vehicles are reported to have been painted in a reddish-brown colour, probably the same colour as that being applied for coach repaints from 1942-5, with open wagons being mostly bare wood with reddish-brown patches for markings. It is likely this livery applied only to new vehicles – repainting of older stock was most improbable. The normal grey livery was resumed after the war."

 

which implies (to me, at least) that while the woodwork was left unpainted (apart from the patches mentioned for serial number etc), the ironwork and underframe would have been painted. The ironwork would have been far more valuable than the woodwork, and surely some degree of preservative paint would have been applied? Which, given British Railways' treatment of newly-built stock in the early '50s, seems not unreasonable.

 

I would have though that black instead of grey would have been unlikely - presumably stocks of white were available to mix grey, in which case why the red - but as you say, it was probably a case of whatever colour was available.

 

Cheers,

 

Mark

  • Like 2
Link to comment
7 minutes ago, 2996 Victor said:

Was not O30 the all-steel diagram?

 

Sorry, my typo. 'O30' should have read '037'.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
11 minutes ago, 2996 Victor said:

which implies (to me, at least) that while the woodwork was left unpainted (apart from the patches mentioned for serial number etc), the ironwork and underframe would have been painted.

 

I agree. And it seem illogical for a body to be painted in one colour and the chassis in another.

 

To be honest, I can't get too excited about reports of adhoc non-official liveries - they're prone to error and exaggeration, and can become lodged in folklore,

 

If it were me, I'd shlapp grey over everything, like wot they always did.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
10 minutes ago, Miss Prism said:

 

 

If it were me, I'd shlapp grey over everything, like wot they always did.

 

 

Do you think that might have included the roofs of iron bodied (and roofed) vans prior to the1935? change?

Link to comment
50 minutes ago, richbrummitt said:

Do you think that might have included the roofs of iron bodied (and roofed) vans prior to the1935? change?

 

No. The context of the discussion in the last few posts is what might have been happening in the war. The GWR had already adopted grey for roofs from 1939 as part of the official livery. There were no new iron-roofed vans built in the war, and no (or scant) effort would have been expended on repainting existing roofs, the majority of which were looking like filthy grey anyway.

 

 

Edited by Miss Prism
  • Like 2
  • Informative/Useful 1
Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold
On 22/08/2019 at 22:52, Miss Prism said:

I've never seen a pic of the treatment given to wagons built between 1942-5

 

Couldn't resist that challenge so looked in all my books, but alas no result. I suppose the last thing anyone would think of during a war was to photograph a plain goods wagon, especially if it was unpainted.

  • Like 2
Link to comment

I imagine being seen photographing anything remotely strategic, during a war, might have led to a rather interesting, informative and one-sided discussion with someone in plain clothes.  If you were lucky.

 

Let alone the issues of cost and availability of photographic materials, which themselves were likely to be viewed as strategic too.

 

i used to work for a company who had a factory in France that had previously been involved in manufacture of film, the Allies had reputedly bombed it...

 

Atb

Simon

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...