Jump to content
 
  • entries
    35
  • comments
    32
  • views
    11,067

Turnouts finished


hayfield

524 views

I have finished the 2 turnouts I was asked to build, the first was a SMP 60" radius built to a B6 size, Its some time since I have used SMP products, I feel that the Paxoline sleepers are not as good as C&L fiberglass ones as the widths seem to vary a bit (the ones in this kit were quite good)and the material seems a bit weaker than fiberglass. Also the rail seemed to be softer.

 

blogentry-1131-0-19200000-1308429124_thumb.jpg

 

I did use the SMP tiebar, but found my normal style easier to fit the blades close to the stock rails.

 

blogentry-1131-0-34363700-1308429419_thumb.jpg

 

Next was the C&L turnout, I fit the common crossing first, then the stock rail.

 

blogentry-1131-0-73661900-1308429505_thumb.jpg

 

Followed by the other stock rail, the switch and check rails. I have also soldered a wire from each stock rail to its switch rail as an electrical bond. Both have been tested and run fine.

 

Thursday I did a bit more to a GWR pannier chassis I am building in P4, hopefully I will be able to do some more tomorrow. I also put a couple of body parts of a K's 57xx into caustic soda to remove the paint, last night these were removed and washed, all the paint came off and the 4 bits which had been glued came appart.

 

I have a spare set of 4'7" drivers in P4 so the 57xx may become my third P4 loco. On the other hand I might just build it using the K's chassis which came with it.

 

Also yesterday a Jamieson GWR King (body and chassis)arrived in the post, its missing some tender axle boxes and front bogie. The question is do I build it as per the kit in 50's standards with the brass bar chassis, or do I add extra detail and use a spare Comet King chassis I have.

2 Comments


Recommended Comments

  • RMweb Premium

Hi. Is there an advantage to fitting the common crossing first, then the stock rail or is it just a matter of personal preference? In the past I've always started with the straightest stock rail and used that as a datum, but I guess as the crossing is the most critical part it makes sense to start from there.

Link to comment
  • RMweb Gold

I'd go for the Comet chassis, myself Paul. Aren't the hornblocks already cut out? Make it a hell of a lot easier to convert to P4 I would have thought.

 

Regards,

 

Nick.

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...