Jump to content
 

69843

Members
  • Posts

    2,130
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 69843

  1. 4702, 4473 and 4464 in that order I believe.
  2. This photo from Flickr also seems to confirm that ‘74 had a raves tender to withdrawal and scrapping, so if the above photo is 34074 I would suspect it was a short term job.
  3. How confidently 🙃 Date aside, the more learned could correct me if I'm wrong but checking notes and photos it appears that 34074 would be a separate loco and tender job or a re-crest job. I cannot see a late crest wide cab with a full height tender in any Hornby option. Though I am happy to be corrected here.
  4. They are definitely black in person. Here is my pair on the weekend. Not the best lighting but it should help.
  5. G’day all With the recent release of the Bachmann DBSO as Network Rail 9702, I’m trying to work out what train/stock would be suitable to run with the RTOVs, both generator (9701/08/14) and non (9702/03). Not being located in the UK, I unfortunately can’t just pop out and take notes, but hopefully others can benefit from this as well. So the question comes-what rakes are the RTOVs typically used as part of? One combination that does seem to crop up in research is 9702/999605 ultrasonic test car/ex-BG generator car, though this doesn’t seem to be a fixed formation. And 9708 was part of SGT1 from 2008-~2013 when that was still running, but is now a normal RTOV. Any other notes/consists would be of interest. Typical rakes, or even the more unusual ones.
  6. Cheers. I will admit from what I can find the "lining" on GT3 is actually moulding (real and model), so whilst I could remove it, a touch harder for KR to do. This is why I did the 2 versions in the end. It was hard to get the 'mid line' strip to look right so I lowered it down to follow the top of the battery boxes. I did go for a plain black as per Fig.1, but it ended up as Fig.2
  7. It's the day folks! https://www.accurascale.com/en-au/collections/class-89
  8. Outside bet on a Class 50 being announced before either get here allowed? 🙃 Come on Hoover-get 'em on the final corner!
  9. First OO scale RTR loco that actually could pull the house down. Though has anyone yet attempted the industry standard 'Pulling the skin off of a rice pudding' test?
  10. Hopefully not the Geraldo Rivera version instead.
  11. So when do we break out the experimental purple for 60022?
  12. I'm gonna take a wild, stab in the dark, hail mary guess and say 37714 in Trainload Freight (Metals) livery. Just a hunch.
  13. The flavour is making inquiries rather than assuming what was the case 30-40 years ago still is, and not believing baseless rumour spread around. Far worse places for railway preservation in Australia than Dorrigo.
  14. That's a very pre-1986 or as recent as 15 years ago attitude.... There has been a lot of money spent on things that aren't "Just another locomotive", and I don't mean other exhibits being acquired. Preventative maintenance. Earthworks. Many other things that are not listed to John and Jane Public. The conditions that Dorrigo is being forced to meet by the council are not new. The street sign battle took many, many years to come to a conclusion on, and is only a minor point. If one were to read a more recent newsletter, one might-shockingly-have a more up to date set of information to work on. What will happen to the exhibits when Keith dies has already been decided on funnily enough, even if people have not been made aware of it. I've asked him the question myself in a phone call and was given the answer. As to 3813? There's no need for it to run. We have 3801 running, 3830 in a condition where it can be restored to run and 3820 as another option. There's simply no point in spending quite literal millions on restoring 3813 to steam. Hell, MY grandkids may never see it run-and frankly, makes no difference if they don't. Tell me. How is Glenreagh Mountain Railway doing? For the breakaway group that was supposed to be running trains, there's been a distinct lack of that for.....14 years.
  15. When you've got a council that is so anti-museum that they even removed the street sign so it was harder to find, it is hard. The requirements the museum is being forced to meet is beyond crazy.
  16. https://blog.railwaymuseum.org.uk/how-much-flying-scotsman-original/
  17. It seems to have been an issue from the tooling from the newer, non Sandra Kan factory. R3443 seems to suffer about 50/50 and the level varies, but from memory the 2015 or so release of Book Law seemed to suffer this and a few other issues. So it's a potential for it to be either issue you've mentioned or both.
×
×
  • Create New...