Jump to content
 

auldreekie

Members
  • Posts

    135
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by auldreekie

  1. Portobello, near Edinburgh on the NBR/ECML. Island platform between Down and Up tracks of ECML Goods marshalling yard directly across Up track. As I recollect (1950s) traffic lights on the road bridge (almost a short tunnel) beneath. I don't think it was a girder bridge - arch more likely, given the narrowness of the road beneath auldreekie
  2. It's the price of having a loyal customer base. auldreekie
  3. Long time no see. I started a catch-up somewhere in August, and life is too short today to run all through and get myself up to date. I was very taken by "semi-itinerant shrubs". It's a nice concept. but I' don't think we have tumbleweed in East Anglia.... auldreekie
  4. My figure of about 60 was rather casually given. In fact, so far as I have gleaned from the internet (I claim no expertise in the matter), there were at least 26, which encompassed maybe two batches, of the superheated Federated Malayan States Railways Class P (the version of which a model has been attempted). Then there were a further 20 of the subsequent enlarged and improved Belpaire-boilered class L. And, before Class P, the very similar but saturated class H numbered 60 units. The history of these classes appears to have been quite complicated. Although the main original destination was the Federated Malay States Railways, a few of the two earlier classes (H and P) were diverted en route to Indian railways, and some of these may have found their way onward to Malaya later. As you say, a significant number of Class P ended up in Thailand auldreekie
  5. A roughly H0 scale (6/7 x 4mm to 1foot) model nearing completion, of a Federated Malay States 4-6-2 built by Kitsons in 1916, NBL in1919. Some of these found their way to Thailand during(?) and after WW2. There were a lot of them (of the order of 60 I think) in three related classes And another, same peculiar scale, similar state of completion. This is of a Colombian railways pacific, designed by a Briton, PC Dewhurst and put into service in 1927. It was designed to incorporate the best of UK and of US practice of the time. Only two were built, one by Haine St Pierre in Belgium, the other by BMAG in Berlin. And this one has a bit further to go before it's up and running: a small pacific for the Darjeeling Himalayan railway by North British in 1914. The design of this one was based on an earlier and larger NB product for the Bengal Nagpur Railway. This one , and the Darjeeling derivative are to 4mm scale, for comparability with the others. The were respectively on 2foot 6 inch and 2foot gauge, whereas the others were on metre gauge and therefor rather larger all over. auldreekie
  6. My. That would be interesting on the Indy2000 circuit... auldreekie
  7. The "Woolnough" boiler used by Sentinel on some of their larger locomotives (including the Buenos Aires tram) was similar in principle to the "marine" boiler used by Gresley on the W1. I was particularly moved to model the Buenos Aires machine, because its bogies used steam traction motors of a relatively traditional form, unlike the (possibly) better-known Colombian Sentinel machines which also used the Woolnough boiler. auldreekie
  8. I found it a good read, especially taken in conjunction with John Hutchings' "Sentinel Locomotives and Sentinel-Cammell Railcars": there's a lot of read-across, particularly in respect of boiler design. Taken together, the two books offer a different perspective on a well-worn tale. I was even motivated enough to build a model of the Sentinel Buenos Aires "tram locomotive" which used boiler technology similar to that of the original W1. and auldreekie
  9. Here's a somewhat improbable heavy-duty narrow-gauge steam crane, based on the Dapol diesel crane kit. The main piece not scratchbuilt or very heavily adapted was the jib, although that too was not unmodified. It has outriggers which function. So adapting the kit involved quite a learning curve. I suppose you could regard the low-loader match-wagon as part of the kit-bash, as its bogies used the sides of the ones in the crane kit. auldreekie
  10. Hi, Les. Welcome aboard. For the meantime (I hope) it beats paddling an inflatable boat across the Channel.... Here's my latest Bodge-o-ploy. There's a particular weak point in these builds. The boiler tube is of butyrate (whatever that may be), and it doesn't take well with styrene solvent. So I have used two-part epoxy well slathered on to fix it to the styrene of which the rest of the structure is made. OK for tank engines, where there is a large contact area between the hacked-out edges of much of the tube and the underlying main box structure. But not so good in tender locomotives, where the boiler tube tends to be glued only to the front of the firebox, and secured at its front end by some combination of glue and bolt. At the firebox end, matters are complicated by the fact that there's usually a major cut-out in this area to accommodate the motor, so reducing the extent of possible contact and support.. So contact area for the glue needs to be maximised, and some support given. In the past, I've done this by carving a segmental piece of 80 thou styrene sheet to attach to the front of the firebox in order to support the boiler, which slides into position over it after it has been liberally coated with two-part epoxy. This has given me no trouble so far. But it is untidy even by my standards, and the increment in surface area isn't as much as I'd wish. A small eureka moment has been today to fashion the support piece from nested styrene tubes. Tidier. And it gives the possibility of increasing the contact area a bit for the glue to grasp on to. We'll see if/how well it works.... auldreekie
  11. I thought I'd make a start both on the cab end of the CC class pacific and on its tender. But I'd forgotten about the joggle in the frames to accommodate the wide firebox. I ought to have known: goodness knows, I've built several machines with this characteristic over the years... Nevertheless, it took me several hours and about three attempts before I understood that, whilst the firebox and ashpan do fit within the frames, it is between a joggled and widened set of rear-end frames. After all that I was rained out of the garden by a thunderstorm and I'm only now back to something like normal, Next up is to build the joggle castings which embrace the front corners of the firebox/ashpan. Then perhaps the tender, before I address the front end and how to connect it to the rest via the multi-level running plates. More later. Maybe. auldreekie
  12. Since it looks as if Doug may be continuing to follow developments for the meantime on RMweb, here's an update on what I've done since my previous post. A fair bit of detail added to the little Norwegian tank locomotive.- - Four steps on tank fronts. - Hinge, hinge straps and "doorknob" on sand-dome. - Shovelling plate on inside of cab rear spectacle plate. - Positions marked-up to locate whistle on cab roof and balance-pipe beneath tanks, when in due course these can be added. - Beading added to upper portions of cab entrance cut-outs. I did find a builder's general arrangement drawing on the internet, courtesy of Museums i Akershus, With my revision to the tank layout, I am pleased to see that my version is a reasonably close fit at scale. Odd that I can find no photographic or diagrammatic indication of the existence of the usual brake pillar in the cab.... It looks as if I cannot make much more progress until rejoined with bits and pieces in the sticks. Primarily, this is because I left behind there my stocks of plastic-coated wire, which is needed to make both the smokebox-door hinge and the delivery pipes for sand from the sand dome. I'm loth to start painting until these are all in place, and such other further detail as is intended needs to be provided only after at least a first coat of paint is in place. So I made a start as can be seen on the CC class pacific of the Bengal-Nagpur Railway. Donor mechanism stripped-out non-destructively (Grafar pacific). Boiler cut-out made using slatted top of garden table as a jig in the usual way. Main "bones" of firebox cut out and glued together, leaving much shaping yet to be done. Many other of the more complex and other main parts have previously been cut out and form a home-made "Airfix" kit, and I shall no doubt make use of them to achieve partial assembly in days to come. auldreekie
  13. Thanks to Mike, Matt and Roger. Like quite a few others, I'm looking forward to the re-emergence of NGRM from the mysteries of the computer/software/hosting industry. That would be a cue to re-establish communication with Doug and others. Meanwhile I think the Chiverses ought to go on enjoying their holiday, preferably without laptop. I'm sorry Doug has been put off RMWeb by unpleasantness. It does happen in the best of worlds as they exist, and I'm afraid that I tend to react in kind. But better, I'm sure, to stand clear. auldreekie
  14. ... Good on you, Keith. Just in case Doug is suffering serious symptoms of withdrawal, here is the rest of the current story about my little Norwegian locomotive build. I mentioned a few days ago that I'd like to provide some representation of the mass of pipework and handwheels which appears to have existed within the cab and over the firebox on these machines. No doubt it all helped to keep things cosy during a cold Norwegian winter. I found another photograph which gave a sketchy impression of what's there in reality. No way can I provide a detailed representation in 4mm scale. But here's a start on something crudely generalised There are two transverse styrene cylinders, one above the other. Each will have a couple of handwheels projecting towards the driver, and the upper one a single wheel pointing towards the RHS. For now, these are represented by shortened Peco track-pins of the heavier-duty sort. In due couse, small etched brass handwheels will be glued to the heads of these trackpins. There will be a somewhat serpentine piece of copper wire from the RHS of the lower tube, through the front spectacle plate and ultimately to the LHS of the steam dome. I imagine what this represents is a steam off-take to drive such things as steam-sanding. But it will wait until later in the build. auldreekie
  15. Doug, It looks as if it is offline. I've encountered a rumour that the Chiverses may in fact be on holiday, and a return next Tuesday has been mentioned. I've no idea if this has any foundation in fact. Meanwhile, having done battle with the sign-in/refresh formalities of RMWEB, here is my holding reply. You'll know how VERY little residual patience I have with all computer-based nonsense, having spent more of my life than is sensible doing battle with it. So you'll appreciate my degree of dedication to giving you a slightly-helpful reply. I cannot, sadly, provide you with an update on some of the really fine modelling being done by NGRM aficionados. But here is the state of play on my little Urskog-Holandsbanen 2-6-2 T in 4mm scale for 009.. I'd been uncomfortable for some time about its proportions. After much thought I decided that it needed an extra 2mm of length in the side tanks, with minimal further amendment. So I hacked out the front plate of the main structural box, along with the attached assembly of front running-plate, buffer-beam and front end stub-frames. I discarded the front plate and replaced it with a slab of 80 thou Plastikard, plus two smaller slabs of the same material to form the fronts of the side tanks. The front running-plate etc assembly was then glued across the lower edge of the two new tank fronts. This restores the correct relationships in this area with the smokebox front, and I think the whole thing now looks definitely more credible. After cleaning up and re-instituting tank-top beading, I'm pleased with the result. I've also provided a representation of the various access steps, which I can describe only as "very Norwegian" on the original machine. Lots more to do. Keep plugging away in the hope that NGRM will return to the internet in due course.... (Afraid I don't know what the latest two face-book-related posts add to knowledge about the present status of NGRM) And you may note the slight wisp of steam from the (incorrect) safety valves, provided by the Gods.... auldreekie
  16. Trust me to participate in (if not initiate) it. auldreekie
  17. The "inadequate cycle lane" syndrome is all too common on this side of the North Sea. It is but a small instance of the British unwillingness to make proper investment in a desirable outcome, to fudge the issue, pretend that the job has been done, and thereby ensure that it will receive no further attention for the foreseeable future. I am a very occasional cyclist, and a frequent motorist and pedestrian. I don't think that merely painting a line on a narrow road or signposting a footpath as provision for cyclists and pedestrians even begins to be an adequate provision, despite claims by local authorities and by national government for the enormous mileage of cycleway which they have public-spiritedly and environmentally-consciously provided. The line on the road merely creates a false sense of security and thereby a hazard for the cyclist: I have no desire to injure or kill the user of such a cycleway, but many such lanes merely increase the probability that such events will happen. The mixed-use pavement has the same effect for pedestrians: too many arrogant cyclists treat it as a dedicated lane for their own speedy use. Indeed too many cyclists already do just that on pavements from which they are expressly prohibited. auldreekie
  18. An unlikely event in a little-visited part of the Scottish borders (with thanks to Bernard TPM and Ulrich for the computer-generated hills, sky and ballast foreground). auldreekie
  19. Annie, Forgive this irruption from an entirely inappropriate context. However, in leafing through past contributions in another place (prior, I hope, to being able under relaxed Covid restrictions to rejoin the Wee Reekie layout), I was reminded that you like large tank engines, particularly those of a British build for colonial railways. Well, here is one recently completed as part of a four-month, five-and-one-part-completed Lockdown Locomotive building spree. Its original was by Bagnalls of Stafford for the CF Amboim in Mozambique, at a time when their usual German supplier (Henschel, perhaps?) was off-limits as a consequence of a little local difficulty, namely World War 2. You know where to find more similar, if interest is piqued. My apologies also to other aficionados of Annie's splendid virtual railways. auldreekie
  20. I liked them well enough to make a 4mm scale (-ish) model of one, albeit on 9mm gauge. auldreekie
  21. Oh, how disappointing. I was hoping for a Caledonian Railway 4-4-0...... auldreekie
  22. Let's hope they get themselves sorted out fairly soon. I've always had good service from them in the past, and one does feel obliged to sympathise with small traders whose methods have been completely upset by Covid. auldreekie
  23. And Mozzer Models I already gave this general advice, but hesitated to nominate any particular intermediate supplier, since I have had consistently good service from all the above. auldreekie
  24. I would not have posted as I did without good reason. I'm glad that others, probably a majority of others, receive good and civil service direct from him. I have no wish to damage his business: far from it: the product is often excellent. But I'm afraid that I have known him to indulge in unprovoked aggressive behaviour for no reason apparent to me. No doubt running a cottage industry supplying the railway modelling fraternity, like all other paid ways of life, has its frustrating and irritating moments. I have no idea why I was singled out more than once to receive the backwash: he won't ever make a fortune out of me, but I don't doubt I've spent several hundreds of pounds with him over the years, as well as recommending several of his products to others. "Be warned, but support his product" is the message from me, and I do not intend to resile from it. auldreekie
×
×
  • Create New...