Jump to content
 

JohnBateson

Members
  • Posts

    36
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

JohnBateson's Achievements

39

Reputation

  1. Mike,

    The etches provide a pair of half etch semi-circles should you wish the wheels to go 'through'  the space occupied normally by the frames. The gap is rather visible if done. Later locos have this cut-out as standard such as the B3, but their frames do not have the kink.

    If the curve is too small, watch out for binding on the front of the cylinder - not seen this myself but others have warned of it, mainly I think, from pre-JLB kits, but I could be wrong.

    John

    1. mikemeg

      mikemeg

      John,

       

      I think the acceptable answer to the issue of the lateral movement of the front bogie wheels is to increase the kink in the front of the mainframes by around 0.5 mm a side. My minimum radius for which this loco (and all of my locos) must traverse is 4' 0" i.e. 1216 mm.

       

      Depending on which datum point is used for the calculation i.e. distance of the front bogie wheel from the front driving wheel (50mm) or distance from the centre driving wheel (80 mm) then the lateral displacement on these 4' 0" curves is 1.03 mm if the front driver is the datum or 1.73 mm if the middle driver is the datum. In either case, adding 0.5 mm a side to the kink will solve the problem.

       

      I have noted a potential for binding on the cylinder front but this won't happen on my curves; the only issue is the front bogie wheels touching the mainframes.

       

      I have had this same issue on the B15, B16/1's, D20's and A6's, where the extra 0.5 mm per side, on the kink, was first deployed.

       

      Once again, many thanks for your help and your interest.

       

      Regards

       

      Mike

       

  2. Its on the way - it requires two small slots or a lump of solder after filigng off the two tabs. Just put a length of 0.45 NiSi or brass in the centre hole to represent the pivot axle!
  3. Mike, Would you care for a scoop (there is a made-up one in the picture to show what it looks like
  4. The new etch overlay will be in the post tomorrow - there are two of them just in case🙂 make sure you get it the right way up!🙃 Just in time I remembered to use the old mesurements for the buffer mounts (on later designs I had eased them a little for the fixing boltsof 0.45 mm NiSi wire), These holes are lightly marked on the rear of the etch should you wish to model the fixing bolts.
  5. Mike, Please see attached a quick drawing of the front buffer beam. The red parts are not part of the buffer beam, they are there to show positioning of the rivets only and will not form part of the etch. Most of these rivets are very close to edges so 'punching through' from the back would not be good and would seriously distort the part. I would suggest a half etch with 'bumps' on the front exactly as the rear buffer beam for your kit. From experience the rivets cannot be a lower diameter than shown since if they are slightly over etched all you will see will be a selection of pimples! Use your fibre glass brush to smooth them down. PS. You will have great fun trying to get 1482 numbering on this buffer beam. John
  6. Mike, As noted by 65179/Simon, the front cover could vary. The original tailrods did not last into LNER days I believe. This left the front of the cylinder with a hole open to steam. Therefore, the so-called stuff box, which stopped steam leaking through had to be blocked and in some cases (it seems to me) were covered with a rounded front cover and in others a flat cover with a protrusion which also blocked up the end hole. As far as the rivets on the front buffer beam are concerned out of the 30 or so pictures available to me, only one had rivets showing and that was not "Immingham". So thanks for that picture. I hope I can add it to the library without offending any copyrights. I also note the door handle and additional rivets in places elsewhere - such as the door itself. I like to think that Robinson formed his abhorrence of rivets during his apprenticeship at Swindon with the GWR. Hence 'green without rivets' for the GCR. Conversation. LNER Apprentice Fitter: "Guv, where do I fit all these rivets, please Sir?" Bowler Hatted Foreman: "Anywhere you find a space, lad" later that day LNER Apprentice Fitter (slightly knackered after a 12 hour shift): Guv, I have fitted lots of rivets, Guv, but I have one left over. Where should I fit this last rivet, Guv?" Bowler Hatted Foreman (now late for the pub and with some asperity): "In the last hole, you stupid boy"🤨 Mike, And a little more seriously, I have a set of etches with space that may be ready to go to PPD in the next few weeks. If I could be sure of the positioning of the rivets I could add a couple of sets - same as the rear buffer beam cover half etch with bumps for the rivets. Up to you. John
  7. The lack of a spigot with the chimney is to allow the potential of screwing the body to the chassis through the chimney rather than with the two nuts at the front. These domes and chimneys are turned after fly cutting the curve and then doing a lot of shaping and finishing - about 3 hours work for each. The chimney is shaped using a hand tool against an template which is on the etches for the body (Sheet 5 at the top). It is always a great excuse to hide in the shed and bend my head over the work for hours at a time. I am afraid that theflat shape of the dome shown I find is rather ugly, but that is the LNER for you. Much prefer the originals! John
  8. Mike, A couple of things. Boiler hand rail knobs. The front one will need adjusting to the rear. From the front of the fire box these are 4' 4.75" (which is correct on the etch) and 10' 8.875" (which you may wish to correct). Simply done, fill the hole with a brass pin and drill a new hole in the correct position. Boiler bands. These are all but invisible, and no indication on the drawings I have or the GA. Basically one at each end (which hides the join) one centered on the dome and two more equidistant from the dome to the ends. On later designs I included 1/2 etch (2" equivalent) for these but they are, I feel, too intrusive. I go with the old Alan Gibson solution of very thin 2" (0.67 mm) sellotape strip and then spray the undercoat on top. On these engines I feel these bands were decorative not functional. Thirdly, on the drawing for the 8F/B4 you can see a 14XX motor and HiLevel gear box. You wondered recently whether one would fit. You will note that the cab design is such that there is spce there as the fire box intrudes into the cab by about 12" - this is a separate part on your etch. And lastly, I note that on the chassis where the brake axle is fitted you have the square supports fitted (see picture). In theory, P4 wheels should not touch these provided the axle slot is accurate but EM wheels will cause a problem. It all depends on the amount of sideplay you are building in. These can be put on the inside of the frames if needed and is probably where they were anyway! JB
  9. A length of "L" under the platform will stop this lot bending while doing the heavy stuff. Only do the valences after the firebox, boiler and smoke box provide a good lock. Don't forget to remove the front support bracket , it is an assembly guide not a permanent fixture.
  10. Mike,

    Just in case you are a real glutton for punishment, there is a Class 8 Fish Engine (LNER B5) on eBay, just Google "Great Central Models Central Railways class 8". It is complete so it seems and has both drivers and tender wheels plus all the other bits according to the blurb. This can be built as a B5/1 or a B5/2 (the one with the raised boiler and rounded windows). Fully rivetted smokebox overlays are there for the B5/2.  I have not built the B5/3 but have three B5/1s in the cupboard, one with all the internal gear, the other two awaiting my attention in the "catch-up" queue.

    John

  11. I would leave the lifting arms in a fixed position so that they fix throught the bottom half of the link - there is just not enough strength in tne reversing arm to get the whole lot to move - if you have you have a reverser in the cab complete with turning handle and it operates the lifting axle that would really be an acheivement. That was a step too far for me. Way too far!
  12. Availability of these designs (Classes 8, 8B, 8C, 8F) which had spacers for P4 and EM and further designs (8A, 8G, 11B) which are P4 only plus there are tender designs, one of which will do for P4/EM/00, the other two are for P4 only.These were handed to Jeremy Suter of the Scalefour Society during 2017 - 2019 for long term preservation along with the rights to use as he thought fit. All the instructions are with Jeremy, some of these stretch to 40+ pages. As Mike has said, these are not kits for the inexperienced - see posts above! Producing these kits left me with no free time among all the other tasks I had at that time. This left me able to concentrate on newer work as and when I had spare time and more to the point, when I had the wherewithall. Jeremy has etches for most of the above designs and should be contacted if there is interest. John
  13. PS - do you have a tender for this Class 8F/B4? The etch can probably be supplied by Jeremy Suter.

  14. I should have pointed out in my drawing from 8 Feb that the eccentrics as shown are simply done with a "copy by centre" so appear to be a mirror image. Of course the right hand set should be leading by 90 degrees, I just didn't want to go through the hassle of redrawing the full set at a different angle and position!🙄 I am sure Mike has spotted this anyway... John
  15. MM asks a question on driver gear. The motor and gearbox I have always thought should be up to the builder since there are so many variations possible. The best I have seen is driven from the tender with a couple of UJs but this is something I have not attempted. The crux of the matter in deciding whether to mount the gearbox on the driver or the two coupled axles is driven by several factors. Note that I draw at full scale in the section below. 1. The spacing of the valve rod - these are 30" centres, or 15" each side. To this must be subtracted one side of the eccentric assembly, i.e. 12" each side which is 4 mm. So the maximum width of the gearbox is 24" or 8 mm. 2. In the gearbox profiles from HighLevel the only gearbox that meets this specification is the SlimLiner at 7.3 mm or the HiFlier and the RoadRunner, which at 7.8 mm is extremely marginal. 3. While there is some flexibility in the valve rods to mount them slightly out, or there is no requirement to have the internal gear (barely visible - see picture), or the inner valve plate is thinned down to less than 0.5 mm, the choice is varied. I bought a couple of Exactoscale boxes that were expensive but would have done the job nicely. 4. Note that HighLevel now have all sorts of new motors and I suspect some of the gearboxes have been altered slightly to suit. While the motor is free to spring up and down, there is also a turning force at the axle. A simple omega loop soldered between the gearbox side and the top bracket at the firebox will sort this out. I think. So, I chose the rear coupled axle and High Level Gear Box HighFlier 40:1. A 12XX motor would be fine although if the firebox front is filed back to allow a little extra sideplay, then a 14XX should fit, which I did for 1098. (Note to self - this has been ready for painting for far too long and I now have a tender for it - no excuse really!) I have qty 4 of these in various states of disrepair, the absence of one of the bodies explains the lump hammer with the red ribbon that I posted earlier. Another question earlier. I use Nealetin extensively, a liquid solder with its own flux. I only use real rosin solder where a stronger joint is needed such as a wedge at a right angle joint. John
×
×
  • Create New...