Jump to content
 

BernardTPM

Members
  • Posts

    5,657
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by BernardTPM

  1. 5 hours ago, John R Smith said:

     

    Have you read the description on this listing? What a load of total codswallop!

     

    Gets my b***cks of the week award . . .

     

     

    It's AI.  There's a lot of it about this past month or so on ebay. "The scale is 1:148 and the gauge is OO" is a classic! Obviously it spotted that Graham Farish products are now N gauge but didn't actually understand the concept of scale and gauge description.

    • Agree 1
  2. 8 hours ago, bobthemilk said:

    Here is another ebay special , what attracted me was the AI / verbose description

    Yes, it stinks, doesn't it? There seem to be a lot of those crass and often inaccurate descriptions lately a.k.a. bovine waste.

     

    "The scale is 1:148 and the gauge is OO"  🙄

    • Funny 1
  3. If it's a Mk.2D it may be the ex-Dapol, ex-Airfix model. Might be worth searching for clues on that. From memory the seating unit is screwed to the floor (possibly from the inside; it's a long time since I last had one) and then the flush glazing clips onto that, the glazing keeping the body on.

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
  4. The most likely candidates are Falcon, Ashley or Elva, though Martin is a possibility. The picture below was taken in 1958 at the Robin Hood, Epping which was (briefly) the works for Ashley.

     

    SX2NQ0S.jpg

     

    There were lots of similar kit cars though, some manufacturers quite short lived.

     

    The car in my photo seems to be an Ashley 1172 which makes sense for both time and place.

    • Like 1
  5. If the conversion is to be based on the current Mk.2 Farish by Bachmann coaches I would use the same offsets from the centre line or it will look odd in a rake. There was extensive research done at the time by Colin Allbright so they're pretty accurate. The pairs of in-line vents over the compartments do centre on the windows. The vents at the luggage end and over the guard's compartment will be the same on BFK and BSO as the same body shell was used.

    As for the toilet, the nearer of those two fittings (on the centre-line) is original, but I'm afraid I don't know when the other, larger one was fitted.

  6. 6 hours ago, Nearholmer said:

    The French Inox coaches of that type, which I think might have been a licensed US design, were very smooth indeed, and had really neat interior detailing, everything made from stainless steel. I wasn’t sure whether the ride was down to clever bogie design or the fact that they were immensely heavy

    The basic shells were apparently 10% lighter than the same DEV design on mild steel. DEV history (in French)

    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 2
  7. 19 hours ago, Pacific231G said:

    A few years ago I wanted to know what shade of green a typically weathered French post box would have been in the 1950s. So, when I got hold of the colour (not colourised)* version of Jacques Tati's 1949 Jour de Fête I thought a scene where the local kids are taking the mick out of François the local postman around a post box would provide some kind of answer. How wrong I was.

    Of course, everyone knows post boxes are red, as this old postcard* proves:

     

    FakeFrench.jpg.48e7717d32b7c2f5be31ea89d6506a6b.jpg

     

    *or not 😈

  8. 15 hours ago, steve1 said:

    Anyone remember Colt cars and is that a Talbot Solara? Wolseley Farina being fuelled.

    1106999A-5180-4E41-B9C3-572BA6BC0A84.jpeg

     

    14 hours ago, Captain Cuttle said:

    Yes thats a Solara

    Given the car towards the front of the picture has the 'Colt' (Mitsubishi) 'star' on the grille, it isn't going to be a Chrysler or Talbot Solara. Some searching reveals it as a 2nd generation Mitsubishi Lancer, though in the UK it was still called the Colt Lancer, a new model in 1979.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    • Informative/Useful 1
  9. 3 hours ago, chiefpenguin said:

    If the numbers are signwritten that could explain differences ?

    Not really; they're right on the real thing when you compare them to the official specifications.

    Actual painted numbers.

    BR Gill Sans.

     

    The Marklin numbers would look better if they were spaced a little further apart. Indeed if the spacing had been right the typeface errors wouldn't have been very obvious. It's only when you look closely you can see the '0's are a bit too elliptical and the '3' is symmetrical top to bottom; Gill Sans '3' has a very slightly longer bottom stroke and the centre part angles down very slightly. The signwriter has done his job correctly.

    • Like 1
  10. 4 hours ago, chiefpenguin said:

    IIRC some of the UK prototype models from "European" manufacture were a sort of 3.75mm/foot scale ?

    British Trix and Rivarossi both used 1:80 scale, though some Trix models: AL1 (because it started as Lilliput) and the late '60s A2, A3 and A4 LNER Pacifics were 4mm scale while the 16t mineral and pig iron wagons were 'accidentally' 4mm scale because their 1:80 scale 17' 6" chassis works out at 16' 6" in 4mm scale.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...