Jump to content

Dubaimike

Members
  • Content Count

    56
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

9 Neutral
  1. I received a copy for Christmas, I think it's excellent. Lots of detail and some fascinating photos which were new to me. Congratulations to the author.
  2. Are the class 14 and class 22 sound effects in this video authentic? I ask because I'm sure the sound which accompanies the class 37 leaving the Dean Forest is of a class 25.
  3. One more thing. The Kittybrewster and Inverurie pictures show opposite ends, so it's possible there's a yellow panel on the other end in the Inverurie picture. Which end can be seen in the Shettleston picture?
  4. Interesting. If the date is correct it's late for it not to have panels, only 2 years before it was officially withdrawn. No visible damage, either accident or fire, but does this have the look of a loco in the early stages of being robbed for spares? No windscreen wipers, missing side window, open engine room doors. OK, I'm reading far too much into one picture!!
  5. Is it definitely D6151 without yellow panels at Shettleston? i.e is the number visible in the picture?
  6. Understood Jim, but among that great cull at the end of 1967 were locos which hadn't run for years because of accident or fire damage. For example D6127 didn't run again after catching fire in 1962, so it never received yellow panels. If D6151 was also withdrawn with no yellow panels as Steve says, it seems likely that it too had been out of traffic for a long time, hence my query as to why that was. Regards Mike
  7. Hi Steve, I know D6127 was damaged by fire but do you know what happened to D6151? Are there any pictures?
  8. On Sundays in the mid 70s I regularly used to ride my bike to Reddish. I was always given permission to go round the shed and I don't think I ever saw anything move, except on the 1973 open day. The only loco classes I saw were 24, 25, 40 and 76, again apart from at the open day. Class 506 EMUs were regulars of course, I'm not sure if I saw any other types. The Longsight class 24s were stored there for a long time before and after withdrawal and these included a couple of interesting examples in 24005, which was originally D5000, and 24021, which carried the BR lion symbol on its' blue livery to the end. I'd like to share an "if only" moment from one Sunday in 1975 when I was delighted to find 40171 on the depot. This was one of a handful of class 40s still in green livery at the time. It was outside the shed, perfectly posed in the sun to show off the terrible condition of the paint, which was worn away to the red undercoat in many places. I took lots of pictures, then moved into the shed building where I found 25043, the only remaining green class 25, was there as well, again well placed for pictures. This was amazing luck and multiple frames were exposed on it. So what happened? The slides came back from processing to show the budget conscious 15 year old why some "own brand" films were so cheap. With dreadful colour balance and totally unusable, they all went in the bin. An unfortunate lesson in why cheap is not always good. I only used Kodachrome from then on, but of course I never encountered these locos again. At least I did get good Kodachrome shots of the two class 24s I mention on a later visit. Thanks for bringing back memories of Reddish and I confirm that in the 1970s there was still a painted notice on an external wall of the depot saying "Pullman Oil Only"! Cheers Mike
  9. Oh, OK. I must see if I can get one. I remember the painted colour illustrations were quite good, but maybe that was because I was about 6. Anyway, thanks for starting the thread, I'd forgotten the book entirely until you did.
  10. I remember this too. I think the children travelled around the UK with their father, who explained aspects of railway working to them as they did. I recall the boy saying he wanted to see "one of those new engines that runs on oil" and the girl being able to list the names of the A3s! But I don't remember the title!
  11. Are you sure about 6339 at SPM in Oct 71 Brian? It was still officially in traffic then. Regards Mike
  12. I've just been dipping into the "Book of the Warships" and the piece on D870 got me thinking. Maybe the collected hydraulic knowledge on this forum can help with some info. D870 was intended to be fitted with ETH, although in the end it wasn't. If it had been: 1. How would the electrical supply have been produced? The BOTW mentions updated engines, but a pretty substantial generator would have been needed surely. Where would it have gone? 2. This was in 1961, did BR have any ETH diesels at the time. If not, why experiment with a DH? Wouldn't a DE be much simpler? 3. Was there any ETH fitted coaching stock at the time? Maybe the WCML electric hauled stock? At the end of its life D870 was sent to Derby RTC for experiments with gas-turbine hydraulic propulsion, but was found to be unsuitable because of collision damage: 1. So what happened then? Was the idea abandoned? 2. Why was D870 chosen, given the number of undamaged withdrawn Warships around at the time? I'll be very interested in any info that throws any light on the above. Cheers Mike
  13. And my wife thinks I'm the worst pedant there is! You're right of course Phil, and I stand corrected. Regards Mike
  14. I know this is plumbing new depths of pedantry, but D4100 was a class 09.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.