Jump to content
 

Hobby

Members
  • Posts

    2,434
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Hobby

  1. Rob, how long ago was that re the model shop? We went in around 2019 and there was only one, and it had little, if any, railways. There used to be one down a little alley which was really good but that had shut up shop a few years before the 2019 visit. TBH model railway shops are becoming fewer and fewer, as opposed to model shops which tend to concentrate on the East European fixation with anything military.

  2. A 20 or 25 would suit me fine, but I suspect you are wrong about Heljan being the manufacturer, I still suspect there's one if the current TT manufacturers watching, though I recon it'll be 2 or 3 years away.

    • Like 2
  3. Agreed, but by that logic if Heljan had still gone ahead it's likely that Hornby would have backed down instead, it's the "Hornby were the bully" comments I was addressing, they weren't, it was simply a commercial choice by Heljan based on what the likelihood was they could get theirs out first and get the sales.

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
  4. 13 hours ago, D9020 Nimbus said:

    Hornby had an existing CAD to use as a basis, and they can move quickly to squash competition — see Terrier. It would have been folly to continue. There seemed to be co-ordination between Peco, Heljan and Gaugemaster; I wonder if Peco had concluded that Hornby were never going to introduce TT120, and had turned to Heljan to produce locos much as happened with the L&B range in 009.

     

    It's on record (from SK and Peco have never denied it) that Peco and Hornby were completely unaware of each others plans for TT and only a chance conversation revealed their plans to each other. Heljan still produce stuff in 00, and have also produced a new loco despite Kato and Bachmann entering 009, so this rumour that Hornby deliberately went out of their way to quash any competition form Heljan doesn't ring true. Who knows what the manufacturers thought, but to be fair to Hornby they said publically that the range had been planned for 5 years (2017 was quoted) before launch and it'd be fairly certain that a stock list/line-up would have been done fairly early in that timescale to justify the investment. Heljan had the cad for the 31 so there was no reason for them not to do it other than their own reluctance following Hornby's announcement, to try to somehow blame Hornby is disingenuous at the very least, or is just pure Hornby bashing.

    • Agree 6
  5. 38 minutes ago, e30ftw said:

    LMS/BR LM

    3f jinty-Can it share the j50 chassis? Not really.

    Black 5 -Announced? Yes though after phase 4

    8f Not announced

    mogul or 0-6-0 - ideal if you could share chassis with other models with similar wheel base even if wheels need to be unique

     

    GWR BR WR

    Castle Phase 3/4

    King Nothing

    little tank engine - Panier After phase 3/4 but I suspect it'll be sooner

    mogul or 0-6-0 - ideal if you could share chassis with other models with similar wheel base even if wheels need to be unique

     

    SR

    Bulied pacific Nothing but there's already a 3d print

    Re Built Bulied Nothing

    A popular tank engine N2? As above

    Slam door EMU - Br green through to privatization, lots of people would have taken one in london/the south at some point in their life I doubt it would be a big seller so well donw the line - look for a 3d print though

     

    BR

    Britannia Announced after phase 3/4

    9F would be very impressive in TT Phase 3/4

    (5 or 4 MT) Not sure about sale figures for these Nothing

     

    BR Diesel

     20 Nothing

    37- Anounced Yes, on 2nd April 12/18 months

    47-Anounced? Catalogue - after phase 3/4

    40 Nothing

    60- To complement 66 as well as other BR Diesels, lots of livery's plus they have one in the 1:1 colection Catalogue after phase 3/4

     

    DMU other than some modern stuff  an 800 - nothing

    Hard sell compared to more interesting Locomotives, if anything class 101 large geographic spread and a fair few livery's

     

    Coaches

    mk2s in the catalogue so should be next 12/18m

    teak LNER phase 3/4 so probably 18/24m

    BR surburban or LMS equivalent that could be used in BR era as well nothing

    GWR coach to go with castle or tank engine catalogue pahse 3/4

     

    Wagons - not sure, but Peco might and there's 3d prints

    16t mineral

    BR vacuum brake short wheel base van

    HAA Coal wagon

    5 and 7 plank generic steam age freight wagon

    Brake down Crane

    VGA wagon for late BR and modern use

     

     

    Wild Cards - I doubt there's a cat in hells chance, and I suspect the market wouldn't warrant it, or the risk which would be large. (I'd rather they just stuck with British stuff as well).

     

    Union Pacific Big Boy- A lot of people would buy for the novelty in UK and Europe, largest steam loco in the world

     

    Union Pacific Centennial - Probably less popular than a BIG Boy but the largest Diesel loco in the world

     

    The above based on the original catalogue and things we've seen since, timescales purely guesswork!!

    • Friendly/supportive 1
  6. 25 minutes ago, frobisher said:

     

    That's somewhat unfair.  Heljan's release of intensions was based on the knowledge a big player was entering the UK scene in the scale.  What they didn't expect was every model announced suddenly being in Hornby's own intensions at range launch, and Hornby's announced price points being quite a bit lower than theirs.  Of course, had they known how delayed Hornby would have become with their 31 they should have continued and funded with the results of the next week's lottery numbers that they'd have already had...

     

    What other stuff had they announced? I only heard of the 31, a link would be helpful. 

  7. 16 minutes ago, Roy L S said:

    It is after all still early days just yet...

     

    I could reply to yours in a similarly long winded way, but there's no need as you said it all in that one sentence. 

     

    We shall see.

    • Like 1
    • Agree 2
  8. 23 minutes ago, Roy L S said:

    In terms of locos and rolling stock  I don't think I would be bold enough to say "more brand new models than any other manufacturer in any scale" and I don't think that's correct, in fact the volume of releases thus far has been comparatively slow

     

    Aside from Peco who have dipped a toe in the water with some track (which arguably has a global market), lineside models and buildings (and a single British wagon) nobody else has committed to producing anything for the British market, and from my conversations with some manufacturers they don't actually seem that interested. This makes Hornby's job in establishing the scale all the more difficult and it is going to take more time than was initially suggested.

     

    With regards the first paragraph, it's difficult to compare, but compared to the launch of TT3 and early British N gauge he's right, they have launched more variety in a much shorter space of time, and especially compared with some of the early British N gauge models, and of much better quality. It's a difficult one to judge as there isn't really anything to directly compare it to, though, as manufacturing was very different back in the 50s and 60s, and expectations from enthusiasts much lower than today.

     

    With regards to the second paragraph, I ask you "Which Manufacturers are you referring to?". There's an awful lot of TT120 stuff out there produced by the cottage industry manufacturers. Granted some others are waiting to see if it's worthwhile but I'd expect some of them to start producing in the next 12 months. Contrary to your conversations the ones I've spoken to at shows are planning stuff and are positive, others are in the "wait and see" mode which is what I'd expect this early in the launch. However if you look at what's available now it's already quite easy to furnish a British layout in TT with suitable buildings and accessories, in fact the only building I don't have is a suitable signal box for a NW England based layout, the rest of the buildings I have.

    • Like 1
  9. A quick look on a google search shows a trucker satnav for just under £200, even on low wages that'd hardly break the bank, especially considering the trucker could potentially lose their licence for a bridge bash or at the very least get the sack and become unemployable. Plenty of other low wage jobs require decent tools and part of the job is to make sure you have them. Perhaps the only way is to make it compulsory for trucks to have that version and be prosecuted for using a car version?

    • Agree 2
  10. Going onto the subject itself, though, why do I have the feeling that's 15 minutes of my life wasted? Surely they could have done some more such as estimated launch times for future (already announced) models?

    • Agree 1
  11. 1 hour ago, Porfuera said:

    Or maybe they're just trying to generate some extra excitement for tomorrow's announcements 😂

     

    There's enough of that already on FB!! 🤣

     

    Picked up my first piece of TT120 at a toyfair this morning, a Peco open wagon! There was some BTTB and TT3 around as well but nothing of interest, though the BTTB reasonably priced.

  12. 33 minutes ago, teletougos said:

    What wheelbase measurement (in millimetres) enables most models from the same chassis ? 

     

    Will their drive be likely to feature a worm going to centre axle, then rods to power front and rear axle? Or is that more an N thing ? 

     

    There are several that have similar wheelbases/wheel diameters, but that question leads onto whether modellers are willing to accept the small discrepancies caused by doing a "one size fits all" chassis. Back in the 50s Triang did it in both TT3 and 00 without many complaints but these days? I suspect that most people would accept a compromise of a mm or so but there will be a small, but vocal, minority who will try to tear Hornby to pieces for even dare thinking of doing such a thing!

     

    I'd expect any 0-6-0Ts to be the same as the 08 which is centre axle driven.

    • Agree 1
×
×
  • Create New...