Jump to content

31A

Members
  • Posts

    3,866
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by 31A

  1. I recently came across what I think might be a late one. On page 90 in the book "Gresley V2s, an illustrated appreciation: 2" by Book Law, a picture of V2 60956 approaching Scarborough in May 1958. It's a black & white photo but a tatty looking Gresley 4 compartment Brake 2nd in the sidings behind is in a single-colour livery, with no sign of any lining on it.
  2. Looks like a Gresley one to me - the roof has domes ends. But yes, maroon probably.
  3. Thank you, I didn't know that and will bear that in mind for next time I do a van with the grey panels. Thanks also for reminding me that I said I would put a picture up of my finished van, but it seems I never did! So here it is. As you can see, I did chicken out of painting the grey panels on that one, but have since done so on various vans. Luckily they were of Gresley LNER design, so three sides of the panels can be defined by the panelling, as per the four wheeler below.
  4. I think you'd find a lot of TOCs are, and it isn't a particularly new thing - it was certainly the case before I retired, 7years ago. The union withdrawing their agreement to work Rest Days is an issue which comes up from time to time, for various reasons.
  5. Interesting to know, and encouraging for the future. I suppose thinking about it, a few of my journeys on XC have been north from York; as you say, usually a bit quieter going that way. A couple of weeks ago I went to Tamworth and the double Voyager was pretty busy in the part where I was now I think about it. Coming back in the afternoon it was the HST, which was also fairly busy. When you're a passenger you don't always know what it's like in the rest of the train!
  6. I'm sorry, but what is your basis for saying that? I have just been reading the article in the December 'Modern Railways' previewing the December timetable changes, and the whole theme of the article is of services increasing, and getting back towards pre-pandemic levels. Is this not as a result of an 'industrial relations' situation? This amounts to three trains per day. Whilst obviously an inconvenience to those who use them (and I know there has been another thread on this subject), three trains per day is merely a drop in the ocean in the big scheme of things, and far outweighed by the increases elsewhere.
  7. Tell me about it! Apart from a very few odd ones (e.g. 1035 Newcastle-Banbury), this means York-Sheffield-The Midlands has been hourly instead of twice per hour since the start of the pandemic, and all go via Leeds & Wakefield which puts about 25 minutes into the journey time to Sheffield and beyond. It also means there's now usually only one train per hour between Doncaster & York (LNER), apart from in the evening when the 1730 King's Cross-Edinburgh omits Doncaster and leaves a two hour gap between 1812 and 2012. I can understand running the remaining trains with two Voyagers coupled to aid with social distancing, but the ones I've travelled on recently hardly seem to have had enough passengers on to make a single set look busy.
  8. 31A

    Oxford N7

    That's good news Les! Surprising what a drop of oil can do sometimes....
  9. I was hoping they might be going to improve the valve gear to bring it up to the standard of the Thompson Pacifics, but it doesn't look as though they are.
  10. 31A

    Oxford N7

    I think (from memory, having taken mine to bits several times!) there are sprung plunger contacts on the underside of the chassis casting which make contact with the pick up strips on the keeper plate - are they clean and making contact properly?
  11. Very sorry to hear that; I hope you both have a speedy recovery.
  12. Sorry, but I don't think there would have been stencil type speed restriction signs on the Settle & Carlisle line in the 1930s/40s, as they were an LNER invention (see Bécasse's post above).
  13. Sounds as though you chose a good roofer Dave; they'll all be very busy at the moment I should think. Not so bad here in York, although still windy enough to prevent a good night's sleep.
  14. Interesting to see how you've gone about doing this, and good to see a successful result. If you can't get any more of the Hornby parts, I wonder whether you've come across these kits from Keen Syatems? https://www.keen-systems.com/Couplings.html I have used them on on Bachmann BR Mk1 suburban coaches, using Roco couplings to couple them to each other or to Hornby coaches fitted with CCMs, so I should think they could be fitted to Mainline / Replica GW coaches without too much difficulty.
  15. I don't mind the signal being there actually. As you say, it appears in a lot of pictures taken at Peterborough station so it helps to set the scene. Also adds a bit of interest in the left hand corner!
  16. Actually this episode has made me think about B12 tenders again, and I wonder whether what I'm looking at in the picture of 61533 in "LNER 4-6-0s at Work" is just a hole in the side sheeting through which the exchanger could be worked, similar to that in the side of the 8-wheeled tenders that were coupled to the P2s? See for example in Yeadon's Vol 7, the picture of 61516's tender on page 61. 61516 wasn't one of the 'M&GN' B12s that had tablet catchers, but perhaps it got the tender from one which was.
  17. Thank you, Tony. That is the best information I've had so far on the tablet catcher brackets on B12 tenders. If I'm interpreting your pictures correctly, it looks as though you've made it look like a kind of elongated lamp iron? I think I'm correct in assuming that they were only fitted to the left hand (fireman's) side of the tender?
  18. I took the old motor apart afterwards actually; it looked perfectly OK inside so I don't know why it didn't work!
  19. Thank you for looking, Lez. The alloy one (your first link) looks as though it would have been able to fit over between the flywheel and the motor for what I did today.
  20. I did think of getting one, it might be a useful thing to have anyway. But I couldn't wait and thought I'd try and improvise with what I've got. Still a bit surprised I didn't ruin the new motor! I did briefly think of heating up the flywheel over the gas hob to make it expand but didn't think I'd be able to do that without melting the plastic end of the motor!
  21. Thanks Neil; big hammers often seem to be the way to fix steam locos.....
  22. So would I if I'd had one, Lezz! I always tend to be impatient. Actually there wasn't much room between the flywheel and the motor.
  23. Bit of a fraught morning, or couple of days here at FSQ. The other day, the B12 61533 was bringing in the "GE" train, when it failed completely. After a few seconds, it would move forward about half a turn then stop again. And so it went on, as if the motor was overheating, although the was no heat to be felt. With the help of the Big Hand from the Sky, and an L1 that happened to be in the Loco Spur, the train eventually reached it's terminus, and the B12 was dismantled for inspection. Nothing visibly amiss, so a dead motor was assumed. None of the usual sources seemed to have any B12 motors in stock, but the motor for the Hornby S15 looked as though it was the same, albeit with a different part number. One was ordered and duly arrived this morning. The motor is indeed the same. But the flywheels are different! The B12's flywheels incorporate the coupling for the drive shaft, whereas the S15s have a hexagonal recess in the end. Don't know how that works as I haven't got an S15. Anyway thinking nothing ventured nothing gained, I got one of the flywheels off the dead B12 motor with a lot of brute force, a broken scriber as a drift and a big hammer. The diameter of the flywheel was bigger than the motor, so the flywheel could sit on the jaws of the vice. However the S15's flywheels are smaller so all I could do was clamp the flywheel as tightly as possible between the jaws, and keep hitting until the motor fell out of the vice onto the floor. Then repeat, until eventually the flywheel was off. Then pressed the B12 flywheel onto the S15 motor shaft, using a big G Clamp as a press. After all that mistreatment, luckily the new motor still worked, and was installed in the demic loco. Putting the body on however, it would run backwards but not forwards! Dismantle again (not helped by the almost impossible location of the rear end fixing screw, beneath the cab floor) and found that one of the motor feed wires was getting trapped in the slot in the flywheel! Sorted that (I hope) and re-assemble, then notice the coupling rods are upside down! Initially cursing Hornby QC under my breath, I then realised that I'd put the driving wheels back in back to front when I'd taken it to bits the other day. B12s have an equal driving wheelbase - who knew! Not me, evidently, or I had forgotten. Anyway easily enough swapped round again, and 61533 seems to be a good runner again, in fact possibly better than it was before. Here are the two flywheels, S15 on the left and B12 on the right (attached to the dead motor). 61533 is now back on shed, waiting to take its back working in the evening. As you can see, apart from the motor it s still in 'ex box' condition. This B12 was used on the M&GN Section, for which it had a tablet catcher on the left hand side of the tender. When the M&GN closed, it spent its last few moths at Cambridge. The tablet catcher was removed but I have a distant photo of it, in "LNER 4-6-0s at Work", which shows that something remained on the tender side, probably the bracket that the tablet catcher had been fixed to. I was hoping to find a better picture to enable me to model whatever it is, before weathering etc, but so far have not ben able to.
  24. Thank you for posting these lovely pictures of your layout and it's beautiful LNER locos; I look forward to seeing more when you're able to post some more!
  25. Similar in York station, where a new Travel Centre opened during last year's lockdown. It has copious racks for leaflets (timetables and others) but for several months (perhaps ever since it opened) they have all been empty. I have read that printed timetables aren't being produced at the moment due to the frequent timetable revisions in response to the pandemic, which is perhaps understandable, and hope that they might be again in future when things stabilise, but somehow have my doubts ....
×
×
  • Create New...