Jump to content
 

31A

RMweb Premium
  • Posts

    4,824
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by 31A

  1. 47 minutes ago, gr.king said:

    Well I've seen Vauclain/Baldwin locos (mostly compounds) with four outside cylinders, in "stacked" pairs with huge common crossheads, but nothing quite like those! Where the upper jackshafts on the real things linked up in some way to drive those small-looking coupled wheels too.  Factor of adhesion not a worry?

     

    Both Rack and Adhesion locos I think - pinions can be seen between the second and third axles of 97 501.

    • Interesting/Thought-provoking 2
  2. 46 minutes ago, jwealleans said:

    I think it may be earlier, John: armed with the knowledge that it's a Series V, I did some Googling and found a post from 2020 which gave some prices and years.

     

    By 1955 ERG were listing the Series IV at 56/- as well as the Series II at 40/10d. and the new Series V at 47/-. 

     

    In your catalogue it's £2 5s (45/- for those too young to remember), which by the guide above puts it in the earlier to middle part of the 1950s.

     

    I also found a post which mentioned serial numbers, so I shall recover the one from mine and contact the chap to see if he can give me a rough date.

     

    Had a quick scan through the Railway Modeller on line archive and the earliest mention of the "Flywheel Drive" motor that I've come across is in a Walkers & Holtzapffel advert for May 1952, headed "Romford and Fly-Wheel Drive".  It says "We have had many enquiries from time to time for the Romford motor unit fitted with a flywheel" then goes on "We are .... pleased to announce that we can provide a motor unit based on the Series II Model, to include a flywheel... ".

    • Thanks 1
    • Informative/Useful 2
  3. 3 hours ago, Wickham Green too said:

    'My' fireman had to do that when I was driving from Poznan to Wolsztyn not very many years ago.

     

    12 hours ago, Wheatley said:

     

    There is an Ivo Peters cine film of a Caley 0-6-0 on a railtour in 1963, the fireman is out on the footplate braying the Westinghouse pump with the coal hammer as the train approaches Whithorn, so it wasn't just a pre-grouping practice. 

     

     

     

    Brake pumps seem to be a recurrent cause for leaving the footplate whilst the train is in motion:

     

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R32uVrKG2j0

     

     

  4. 2 minutes ago, Captain Kernow said:

    What is wrong with the (fairly) recent Hornby version of this vehicle, please?

     

    There must be something wrong with it, given that Rapido have decided to do one themselves...

     

     

    One thing that's wrong with the Hornby version is the shape of the roof - the curve is too pronounced.  It should match the shape of the Parkside kit fish vans, but doesn't.  Sorry, I've disposed of my Hornby ones for that reason, so I can't take a photo to show what I mean!

    • Like 2
    • Agree 2
    • Thanks 1
    • Friendly/supportive 1
  5. 9 hours ago, Tony Wright said:

    The train's consist? A steel-panelled Gresley BG (wooden-bodied; note angle trussing), not sure, 12 ton four wheeled van (recently-painted), BR CCT, BR Mk.1 BG and can't tell. 

     

    Second van looks like an LNER 4 wheeled passenger brake BY (sometimes referred to as "Pigeon Van").

    • Agree 1
    • Thanks 1
  6. 3 minutes ago, jwealleans said:

    You're not wrong, you can lose some of the subtlety.   This is one of mine (the Cambrian D178, actually) before and after weathering.   The camera has lost some of the effect as well, but you can see that it does blend and lose the small plank variations.

     

    spacer.png

     

    spacer.png

     

    Thanks, not just me then!  The overall result looks good.  I've got one of those kits to do sometime, as well ....

     

    • Like 1
  7. Just now, jwealleans said:

     

    I disagree, Steve.   It's nice and subtle as it should be.   I think it's a bit clean overall, but I'd be really pleased with that if I'd done it.   Humbrol 160 is a good tip too, tvm.

     

    Thank you Jonathan, glad you like it!   Actually I meant to put, I think it's a bit clean!  Won't be going over it again now with the weathering otherwise I'd probably end up having to do the rust etc. again too; perhaps it's just been through a Washery....

    • Like 1
  8. 1 hour ago, mullie said:

    Having looked at a few photos, I wonder if it could be March?

     

    Martyn

     

    Bingo Martyn, yes I believe you are correct!  The west end of March station with March North Junction box just out of shot to the left, and Norwood Road on the embankment in the background, leading to the overbridge which is visible behind the first vehicle of the train.

     

    I can't find any photos on line to support this but here is the March North signal box diagram from the 1960s, by which time the signalling had been simplified and it seems the siding ending at the buffer stops by the platform ramp was no longer there.  But it looks to me as though the picture was probably taken from Platform 6 (per the diagram; present day westbound platform now numbered 1) with the face of Platform 5 in the foreground and the west facing bay platforms 3 and 4 beyond that.

     

    https://www.flickr.com/photos/pwayowen/7275153232

     

    I don't think the water tower in the picture was associated with the loco depot, which was a long way away from the station on the other side of Norwood Road bridge and had its own water tower, but may have been to supply water cranes in the station area.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    • Round of applause 1
  9. I agree with the above!

     

    Could I just ask, what is it about the appearance of the Bachmann model of 61949 that makes you think it is incorrect?  I've had one for years and am quite happy with it!

  10. 4 minutes ago, Rosie Taylor said:

    Also, from prototype photos some ends have the apparatus and some ends dont - were these tell-tales only at one end (and if so, which)?

     

    Yes, they were only fitted at one end of the coach.  I don't know whether there was any hard and fast rule as to which end they were fitted and can only suggest looking at photos or drawings.  

     

    This may help:

     

    https://www.flickr.com/photos/lnerca/15309983385/

     

    Lots of pictures of LNER coach details on that Flickr site!

     

    Several pictures of LNER coaches on this site as well:

     

    https://www.flickr.com/photos/robertcwp/albums/72157603653607671/

     

    • Informative/Useful 1
  11. On 03/04/2024 at 13:23, Mark Laidlay said:

    So did any early British railways use double compound as the name?

     

    A (late) friend of mine used to call them double compounds.  He was British (Welsh to be specific) and a railwayman, but not a permanent way man.

    • Like 1
  12. 8 hours ago, No Decorum said:

    I haven’t an A2 in express blue and I’d be very happy to buy one. With Blue Peter emerging in blue, it would be a good time for Bachmann to produce one.

     

    Sorry to be a spoilsport, but in reality A2s didn't carry BR blue livery, until (it appears) the preserved Blue Peter is now to be turned out in  that colour.

×
×
  • Create New...