Jump to content
 

MarkNJ

Members
  • Posts

    37
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

221 profile views

MarkNJ's Achievements

35

Reputation

  1. Hi Mike, That is a view I do not have, thanks for posting it. Apart from clearly showing the locations of the tank fixing brackets it confirms the location of the filler between them. As for the absence of lifting brackets on this loco, just one more mystery to ponder. Best regards Mark
  2. Gentlemen, I am in the process of building the Mercian kits in O and HO. I am at the point of installing the tank braces and noticed a couple of details that seem to have been over looked due to the lack of a proper GA and the similarity of this loco to the Jinty. Mainly it is the location of the tank fillers and lifting brackets. On the accompanying photo clippings it seems the tank fillers are a lot further aft than we all thought and the front lifting brackets are where the tank fillers are assumed to be located. This post is meant for information and is in no way intended to detract from the excellent work done by k222009. Best regards Mark
  3. Hi Tex, I live in northwestern Canada and have the same issue getting suitable paints. I have been trying Citadel and The Army Painter brands as the local gamers store carry them. The Army Painter is excellent paint and adheres to brass very well once cured. I found Citadel not so good for brass. Both ranges have a large selection of colours though the local store only carries a small selection. The Army Painter "Chaotic Red" is a very close match for LMS/BR maroon. I have heard excellent reports about Vallejo paints but have not had chance to try them myself. All the above should be easily available in the USA. All the best Mark
  4. Hi Chas, The Jubilee just needed setting up once, after it was balanced. All the best Mark
  5. Hi Chas, I model in various scales and gauges and I have tried various systems except CSB. I find horn blocks are not an absolute necessity but make life a little easier. My O scale MOK 9F uses both springs and compensation beams and is a very smooth and powerful loco even around the 72" radius curves and points on my outdoor layout. In 4mm scale I have a Gibson Jubilee which is fully sprung and once set up is smooth and pulls well. I also have a High Level Andrew Barcklay 0-6-0 which has just compensation beams no extra weight and has better traction than my old K's J72 which is about twice as heavy. My HO steamers are all fully sprung, but I think the springs are a bit too stiff to compensate properly. I hope this is some help to you Mark
  6. Hi there, I find the main advantage of compensation is improved traction, this means I do not have to weight my locos, just balance them. Cheers Mark
  7. Hello Peter, Some very nice modelling going on here. 3D printing has opened up a whole new era in the ability to model the very early railways. My self and a friend have been working on some 3D printed parts. I do the drawings in SketchUp Make and he has the printer, the main issue for us is exporting the drawing in a format his printer will accept. SketchUp Make only exports as .dae or .kmz. which are not compatible with my friends slicing programme. I see from your screen shots that you are also using SkechUp Make and checking on your printers web site it's slicing software also does not support .dae files. How do you get your info to the printer? Best regards Mark
  8. Hi there, I have used a full size sand blaster, but find it is a little too aggressive for the finer model sections. The Paasche works well from 30 psi upwards. The secret is to eliminate any moisture from the blasting medium. Also resist any temptation to reuse the medium any impurity will result in a blocked nozzle. I have used a 3/4 hp contractors compressor with tank for the last 30 years. I found the aerosols to be totally useless. I started with the Badger unit until it wore out then upgraded to the Paasche which I find does the job admirably. Hope this helps. Mark
  9. Hi all, I thought I would share the modifications I made to this excellent kit. I made the sides removable and the clamps operational so I could pose it being loaded. I also sprung the buffers as I find with the Dingham couplers I use it improves operation. Does anyone have details of the palletized brick loads the wagons would carry. I had a look on line but did not see much. Regards Mark
  10. Hi there, I can strongly recommend grit blasting. I have been doing it for the last 35 years and find it makes painting a breeze even on brass. I do not have access to the various etching primers I read about on the forums so had to find another way to make the paint stick (especially to brass) and grit blasting was the answer. The fear of paint lifting when removing any masking was eliminated. I use a Paasche air eraser with their aluminium oxide grit or Badgers. Mark
  11. I have an outdoor layout and use PECO 124 bullhead flex with hand built pointwork using Marcway components. Not very unusual until you realize I live in the Yukon with -40deg C winters and +28deg C summers. When I was planning the layout I contacted PECO regarding the suitability of their track, they did not recoomend it due to the temperature variation. Not wishing to hand build the regular track I ignored their advice and used their flex. After 3 years the track is as good as new. I was surprised that the PECO flex track was cheaper than the components from Marcway for the regular track which I would then have to assemble. The rail and sleepers for the pointwork I bought from Marcway. They were a lot cheaper than PECO points and enabled a more flowing formation. I hope this helps. Mark
  12. Hi Hendie, I know what you mean with erratic paint supply. Hi Hendie, My commiserations on the window location error, it also looks from the photos like they are a bit too low. It looks like the tops should line up with the main windows, or even a tad higher. Keep up the excellent modelling. Mark
×
×
  • Create New...