Jump to content

C126

Members
  • Posts

    1,200
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by C126

  1. @Compound2632 Thanks for your kind remarks. Yes, the B.W. packs are white, although perhaps they could receive a satin varnish to represent the plastic's gloss, and you are quite correct in voicing concern about the 'end loading' in the Opens. It is the only way I can get them to fill the wagon neatly. The 'narrowest' way lying flat is to have two packs side-by-side giving a scale 'load width' of 32mm., 2 mm. too wide. No wonder they went by lorry. If anyone can shed light on any wagons used 'in reality' for these packs, I would be interested. Some sort of sheeted 'Timber open'-style wagon, with bolsters?
  2. Waiting for the garage to warm so I can do some soldering, I have been churning out six-dozen 'wool sheets', thanks to @enz and 'British Wool' (formerly the British Wool Marketing Board). I will edit this post later to provide additional information if the latter's kind correspondent permits, but these white polypropylene sacks took over in the mid-1970's from the smaller, brown, 60lb. hessian sacks to be seen in pictures of the Tetbury wool sack races. These will be another project. Thanks to @enzfinding a document with their dimensions, I bent and soldered a piece of 6mm. nickel-silver strip to make an oblong with internal dimensions 16x22mm. This was my first attempt at a butt-joint, and I was rather pleased, even if I did use to much solder. The two prototypes next to the lorry are before I knew the correct dimensions. Then it was just a case of rolling out a lump of modelling clay 6mm. thick, pressing out oblongs with the above 'cutter', and pushing them out and smoothing the shape with wet fingers. Took a day to dry. Not perfect, but they will do, I think. Now I need to ponder how to do any lettering, if at all. A pleasing wagon-load, if having to invoke 'Rule 1' to use it. Annoyingly, they do not stack inside a OO wagon of 30mm. width, and are not 'pallet friendly'. Of course, now I am wondering if I should have moulded them in one large 'lump' instead...
  3. Fair enough. I was acting under the assumption Grove Ferry remained open, as a 'Barnham-style' junction station. This was the example I was trying to remember.
  4. Sorry to make things more boring for the sake of 'realism', and I stand to be corrected, but I think the service would be a simple shuttle to a junction at Grove Ferry and no further, for a change onto the train to Canterbury West. In the late '70's, things were being run down, as the future was the motor-car. The only occasion which springs to my mind (admittedly of limited knowledge) of a branch-line train going onto a larger station as it were is Seaford-Brighton, connecting at Lewes for the Hastings/Eastbourne-Victoria. I am not sure why you would want pl.1 to be used for passengers; please could you elaborate?
  5. Mornin' all. May I just hold my hand up to the confusion about trains through to Ashford and Hastings. This was when I thought the location was inland, half-way on a line of longitude between Faversham and Charing. Now it has been relocated, I defer to everyone's local knowledge, and also admit to being confused by the original railway company initials rather than the lines' main stations, so please forgive any mistakes I make. If pl. 2 is to remain electrified, what is to be done with the loco-hauled Mk. I.s, other than occasional inter-regional portion and Saturday excursions? Also, I would hold out for a commuter service joining at Grove Ferry for lowly-paid plebs unable to afford to live in Canterbury; it is not just London that has commuters. Like the Lymington and Sheerness(?) branches, a one-unit shuttle connecting to a main line. Sure there was something else to add from a previous page, but I have forgotten now. As to Suder's business, think of 'anything in a van'. To increase interest, it would be nice for her/his business to be served by an extra 'Q' (as required) Speedlink train, as presumably the Zanussi warehouse would have a daily block train north to their depot. And personally, I find block trains boring...
  6. Well, I am glad my summary is largely all right. May I still argue for the de-electrification of pl. 2 to allow use of peak-time supplementary commuter loco-hauled stock (as I am not sure for what else it would be used), please, perhaps on a rambling semi-fast route via Canterbury, Ashford, and Maidstone West to Town, or to Hastings (I think this would be far enough for it to terminate, and there were(?) run-round facilities there). Or both (one with the mini-Buffet)! However, it is your railway, I must remind myself...
  7. As we are now on p.4 of the thread, I wonder if we could compose a summary of what we have decided, and Ray Von agrees, please. Sorry to be a 'bear of very little brain', but it is easier gathering one's thoughts and filling in the last gaps (if any). I think we have agreed to Nearholmer's splendid map, and that the run-down diesel service will run from pl. 2 to Canterbury. Or is it electrified? Is the line still open down to Shepherds Well? This line will handle freight: white goods and sundries to the warehouse, fish and shell-fish in N.P.C.C.S. (how about it going back to Town on the Newspaper empties?), M.o.D. traffic, and perhaps imports/exports to the Wharf when some ferry vans are procured. Also agricultural supplies in sacks, like Bartholomew's of Chichester. Pls. 3 & 4 is the whizzy, go-ahead, frequent, electric service to Town. Scrap goods would amble along once a day, occasionally with a waste-oil tank, perhaps returning to the electric arc furnace at Sheerness? Errrrr... have I missed anything? Is Ray Von happy with all this that we have decided for him?
  8. By the time I post this, I will have forgotten what I meant to comment on on p.3 of this thread, but may I just alert all to imports needing ferry-vans, I assume (those IIB Cargowaggons are available), especially if like Paddock Wood, whereas the fleet here is VAAs, VBAs, and VEAs. This suggests a domestic source and destination. I would agree with Nearholmer that Railfreight, to my limited knowledge from too many years trawling any book of photographs (and some not), had no buildings of their own by the late 1970's. It was private enterprises that used existing old buildings (e.g., Fogarty's of Blackburn?) I think. However, could it not be advertising their service?!
  9. The problem with cement/gravel is it would be long block trains, rather than Speedlink wagon-load. However, R.A.F. Manston could see deliveries of 'government stores'. It occurred to me later that shell-fish and boat-catches would be more likely to be sent up 'fast' via N.P.C.C.S., rather than Speedlink, which obviates the need for those cute VEAs. Bother. However, perhaps one could have traffic of bagged cement in or out?
  10. I managed to endure the cold before the temperature dropped really low recently, and scared the bejezus out of myself by snipping and drilling 0.5 mm. nickel-silver sheet into some sort of electric panel. The first time I had drilled metal, and I hope the last. Despite pilot 'dents' with a nail on marked out dots - the push-to-make switches and power-input plugs are at 7/8" pitch - the drill gave a decidedly 'eccentric' hole on seven of the ten. However, it fits, which is all that matters. Hole drilled and sawed in baseboard, plate with two coats of undercoat and one of top-coat, and cork trimmed away: Panel in situ with third coat of top-coat, and only one scratch on installation: I like the 1/4" telephone plugs, with their 19th-century 'telegraphy' heritage. I always wanted to be a teleprinter operator... Now I just need the weather to warm up enough for me to spend time in the garage wiring it all in.
  11. That is the one. "The splendid Fleischmann HO layout featured at the Festival of Model Railways Show in London in the summer of 1977 included a working automatically operated hump yard, built entirely from standard Fleischmann parts." A single hump road gave access to a five-road sorting yard via a King 3-way and 2 points.
  12. If I may drag the thread off-topic in a different direction, I hope the following might prove inspiration enough to those with the will and space to build a hump yard layout needing a '13': A miniature hump? ELLIS, Chris & ANDRESS, Michael. Model Trains, 1980, OCT. (Mentions "the Rev. Edward Beal built one for his famous West Midland layout over 30 years ago!" Does anyone know this layout?) Hump yard layout. LINK, Roy C. Railway Modeller, 1994, JAN. (There are subsequent part(s), which I missed.) A model hump yard. LOCKWOOD, Christopher. British Railway Modelling, 1998, JULY. Drop me a line if you would like further details. Hope this is of interest.
  13. Re my goods handling suggestions, I, also, was confused by the two establishments in one frontage; sorry about that. Also, I am not sure what sort of economy North Kent had then. I assume only vans will be handled at the Railfreight and Suder's, and one flow could be a block company train of 'comestibles' from the north (but this means a repeated rake of identical vans). For 'Speedlink' wagon-load traffic, could shell-fish be harvested in quantities sufficient to be sent speedily up to Town by rail? VEAs from the quay-side, loaded thus owing to tight curves in the docks, and reversed to add to the main train? What is the land-use for the area? This should prompt thoughts on goods in and out. It looks very much like Pevensey marshes: bleak, desolate, and dotted with sheep. Could sea-salt be harvested, packaged, and sent out? If not fertilizer, how about (bagged) animal feed, seed, and chemicals in occasionally to a merchant's? Extractive industries need hoppers and opens, rather than vans, but is there any light engineering, associated with the sea nearby? Is there food grown nearby that could be processed and dispatched? I am not quite up to speed - not enough Darjeeling drunk yet to-day - but hope the above helps supplement Nearholmer's ideas.
  14. You will put in buffer-stops, won't you, lest the driver get distracted by the 'invigorating' advert ahead...?
  15. Sorry to confuse; have I read the maps incorrectly? I wondered if the "rambling route" (pls 1 & 2) could be more 'run down' like the Ashford Hastings line - which would mean using diesels - and so have an extension to the Ashford-Hastings service. I am not very au fait with Kent, so do put any errors down to my reading Wignall's 'Complete British railways maps...'. I have your station placed just North-west of Ashford and South-west of Faversham, so perhaps a junction near Charing? However, if you want to keep the electrified platform, then you can dispense with the diesel provision. Hope this makes sense.
  16. You haven't even scratched the surface. Ask us what freight could be handled at your warehouse...
  17. I take my hat off to what has been proposed so far. Just a quick thought, looking at my rail atlas, how about running a DEMU as an extension to the Ashford-Hastings service? I assume your station would be served by a branch from Ashford, but this means removing the Third Rail...
  18. You are certainly not alone in having models that bare no relation to their intended layouts: I have an SNCF 'CC' nez casse AC-electric HO loco bought as a birthday present from my parents when we were on holiday and highly prized (so beautiful!), and now want a Class 13 shunter for my S.R. goods yard if it is ever made. I muse occasionally on what it is that makes a train 'attractive' or not: good design (Hymek, Class 53 Falcon, H.S.T.), sentimentality from one's childhood (33, 73), or just downright ugly (modern Class 70, Class 68). My old Lima '40' will be staying in its box, but I want a 25/3 to call at my yard with an inter-regional Company train. Perhaps you could use your 25 for a brief, seasonal, intensive, freight flow (but I have no idea what. Hops to go northwards to Burton-on-Trent?). Keep up the good work on your layout and letting us know how you get on. It looks splendid, and I am sure I am not alone in finding inspiration for my own project.
  19. I had a sudden idea about using the '40' on an over-night Company block-train to the private shed, like the Kelloggs service to Crawley New Yard from the north via Willesden. However, this would be very much 'artistic license', I think, to have a Speedlink in addition, and the '40' might have been changed to a '47' at Willesden. See Michael Rhodes's photo in Dr Paul Shannon's 'Speedlink' (2014), p.7. "One of the first flows to use B.R.'s air-braked vans was Kelloggs traffic from Trafford Park to Hatfield and Crawley, which ran as a combined train as far as Willesden. No. 40 143 pauses at Manchester Piccadilly with the Willesden-bound train in January 1977."
  20. May I just compliment Nearholmer for getting in before me! Hope my ideas do not sound quite daft compared to his wise words. Sorry: idiot that I am you would not need a loco-hauled peak-time service when the lines have 3d Rail. Doh.
  21. I would start with the passenger services, which being Southern would be likely to be regular 'clock face', supplemented with loco-hauled extras (e.g., Uckfield and East Grinstead branches on the Central Div.). I would think a service would certainly serve London, so depending on how your terminus relates to other lines, either have loco-hauled peak 'through' services, with a shuttle off-peak (2-3 an hour, varying in speed?) connecting to a junction station, or have your station serve 'through to London'. Please correct me if I sound out of turn, but the Southern is rather 'London focussed'. Then 'bolt on' the extras: parcels, newspapers, a Kensington Olympia inter-regional 'portion' that is joined to another portion from a larger terminus, ditto a 'Sleeper' car if you want to be exotic. You could stretch it, perhaps, to serve a boat-train if you want your station near the sea. The last two would be early in the morning and late at night. As for freight, I think the scrap train would call daily (I stand to be corrected), with a 'Q' (as required) addition of the tank for the waste oil. I think freight was served outside peak hours, simply owing to pathing constraints on a busy commuter network. The despatch shed could have a daily trip service, perhaps late in the evening to allow over-night delivery, or in the morning (09.00-10.00) for 'next day delivery': anything needing to go quicker could be sent by Parcels (departing late after-noon). So, if I have not got quite the wrong end of the stick, I think it would be a case of 'inter-lacing' the regular passenger workings with the daily 'irregulars'. You could put these on flip-cards, or type up an hourly schedule and work from this. Errr... does this help?
  22. I can only concur with what has been written previously - and would like to mention Nearholmer in dispatches for his kindness with a few Private Messages last year containing ideas for me - and look forward to reading what stock you have for what sort of layout, and where it is set. With my layout, I have been composing endless lists of suitable freight (if bending rules to make it busier than would have been), and then searching for lorries to deliver/collect it and wagons to carry it. I am obsessed currently with wool 'sheets' (un-graded bales) and pallet sizes (why are there three?!?)... I look forward to seeing what you have in mind.
  23. I must say on seeing this that my first feeling was similarity to the terror of completing a job-application form. Never been one to 'sell myself' or argue thus!
  24. Dear Clive, Sorry, I meant it to be 'all relative'. Yes, I am sitting in my B.R. blue Southern Region bubble (but still would run a '13' on my goods yard, under 'Rule 1' for aesthetic reasons!). The whole economics of model production mentioned here looks to be a minefield, of which I am ignorant. I do not know if the 4VEP sold well (assume so as I can not find one 2d hand). I just hope 'market forces will prevail' to paraphrase Ma Thatcher, and I may have a reasonably-priced 4CIG one day...
×
×
  • Create New...