Jump to content
 

RodneyS

Members
  • Posts

    230
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by RodneyS

  1. The original Triang axles were 9/64'' in diameter. I suppose there must have been a reason for such an odd size. This is why the bushes have such a thin wall. Markits do indeed make an axle this diameter. Rodney
  2. The K's sand wagon was my first white metal kit. I saw it advertised in the Model Railway News when it first came out and eventually managed to obtain one. It came with Jackson metal wheels with the domed ends and rather strangely they were nickel plated. I glued it together with Evostik which is all I had at the time and was disappointed that it wouldn't run on my Triang track ! I also had problems getting it square. Eventually it fell apart and was put in a box. Come the lock down and I decided to reassemble it. Unfortunately one of the wheelsets had disappeared, goodness knows where as it's not that small. Perhaps I used it for something. In the interests of 'historical accuracy' I used a similar set of wheels which were in the familiar blackened brass. I enlarged the axle holes and used some equally old Peco brass axle bearing cups. The wagon is quite free running, obviously not as good as pin point bearings but not too bad. During the reconstruction I discovered why I had so much trouble with it. The axleboxes looked to be castings which had been added to the patterns for the sides. One was rather shrivelled up and deformed which resulted in that axle hole being a bit higher than the other one. As the kit seemed to have two identical castings the difference in height was effectively doubled. It could never have been assembled square. The sensible thing to do would have been to use etched W irons as Barclay and Hayfield did. However, as I wanted to keep it original, I filled the two offending holes and re-drilled them. More by luck than judgement I managed to get the new holes in the right position and the wagon is now in one piece - and square. It would be interesting to know if Chas Levin's kit also has the same problem. Rodney
  3. From what I can remember (it was a long time ago) ECM would adjust the feedback setting if the controllers were returned to them. Perhaps that is what happened to Tim's ? Not an option now of course. Rodney
  4. The first Ratio loco kit was for a 4-4-0 and that was all plastic. Even the wheels were plastic and plated. The 2-4-0 had a brass chassis and Mazak wheels. I believe the 4-4-0 was later released with an etched brass chassis. If you find an original loco kit then all I can say is good luck. There is some information on the kits here. Rodney
  5. Hi Leigh I've just checked my 33009 which I bought new and have hardly used. It is the same as yours, two hoses on the front and one on the tender. No hose in the bag just the front coupling and other details you have described. Possibly something to do with hoses fouling the couplings ? Rodney
  6. That is an interesting photo of Waddon. It must have been taken after it was withdrawn as it has the Marsh chimney taken from the Brighton Works Terrier instead of the Drummond one it carried during its working life. The Marsh chimney was going to be used for the restoration but a new one was made instead so it ended up at the Bluebell Railway. Hopefully it is still there, the last surviving piece of 'Brighton Works'. Rodney (Terrier nut)
  7. I've found a couple of pictures of preserved cranes on this link. As the jib is held in position with rigid links I've often wondered how it was raised and lowered into the lifting and travelling positions. I suppose this could be accomplished with the hook attached to the jib until the links were fixed in place. Rodney https://www.svrwiki.com/GWR_601_1Ton_10cwt_Hand_Crane#/media/File:GWR_601_1Ton_10cwt_Hand_Crane.jpg
  8. I'd been wondering about this as I've not heard anything about the coaches I have on pre-order. Rodney
  9. I hope Martin replies as it would be nice to hear from him again and perhaps get an update on the layout - even if it is only about demolition ! If he doesn't reply I have one of those kits in my unmade stash. I don't have a scanner so a photocopy would have to be sent by snail mail. PM me your address if you want me to do that. It is amazing how many kits seem to be sold with no instructions. Is there an instruction black hole somewhere I wonder ? Rodney
  10. I assembled one of these kits more years ago than I care to remember If I were to do it again I wouldn't use any of the K's chassis at all. However at that time the wheels, gearboxes and small motors were just not available. As Barclay says the wheels are too big which makes the loco sit rather high. The K's wheels changed over the years. Mine had a D shape on the end of the axles which located in a small flat in the plastic wheel centre. A large headed screw went into the end of the axle and holds the wheel in place. I assume this has been altered on yours as you mention a brass bush. Presumably you have plain axles. My chassis was just two strips of brass with some holes punched in. The front part which holds the cylinders was white metal castings screwed to the front frame spacer. I used the K's motor and a Gibson plastic gearbox giving, I think, 38:1 reduction. It does still run but is very noisy. The white metal castings in my kit were very nice and I was very pleased with the model. It doesn't look as nice as Barclay's though ! Rodney
  11. Well Tony, your C12 looks so much better than the one my friend bought, even before the accident. Another purchase by this same friend was a G2 0-8-0. A Gem kit I think, on a rather nice etched chassis. One axle was sprung with proper horns and axleboxes and fitted with flangeless wheels - correctly I believe. It looked really nice and ran very well but only on straight track. You have mentioned in the past about kit built locos with absolutely no side play on the wheels ! Fortunately he sold it on. Some other poor soul now has the problem. Rodney
  12. My Lima 94xx was stored away for quite a while. When I looked at it the weight had swollen up and forced the plastic footplate down. I managed to get the weight out but the footplate remains bent. A friend had the same problem with a Lima Crab. I assume this is the result of Mazak rot and could explain why your weight is missing. Rodney
  13. You have my sympathy. A friend bought a made-up C12 which did not run very well. He asked me to look at it and I managed to re-solder some broken joints on the chassis. It was still a disaster but then he did the decent thing - unintentionally. He carried it up to the loft layout and managed to drop it. It hit the first floor landing and then proceeded down the stairs to the ground floor. Saved me a lot of trouble. I'm sure he could be persuaded to do the same with yours - and the Crab. Rodney
  14. Many years ago a fellow club member showed me how he made coupling rods to fit a chassis. As he was by trade a tool designer, it was always worth listening to what he had to say. He would not drill the coupling rods and frames together. He explained that it would not be possible to enlarge the axle holes accurately without the drill wandering off centre. Instead he assembled the chassis with wheels as you have done. He then measured the axle centres using a pair of spring dividers - with sharp points of course ! He placed one end of the dividers against the tread at 9 o'clock (or 3 o'clock). He then adjusted the dividers so that the point was against the adjacent wheel tread. The dividers were then used to mark the centres for the rods. As he measured on the wheel tread it was easy to get the dividers to 3 or 9 o'clock. Any slight discrepancy in this would have a minimal effect on the length of the rods. I have tried this method and it worked for me. In those days we only had the choice of Romford or Hamblings wheels. Neither had a centre on the axle end to measure from. He generally used Romford wheels and did (naturally !) machine them all to exactly the same diameter first. Rodney
  15. I have an Olfa cutter which is similar. The blades actually remove a little 'curl' of plastic with hardly any pressure needed. Rodney
  16. Personally I wouldn't bother with the hip irons. They weren't always used. They would be very fiddly to do and to get all four the same would be difficult. Less is more. If you really want to fit them then perhaps a small hole drilled in the end of the hip and make them from office staples. I've never tried it myself. If you do this then please make sure you bend the end down in a nice curve so they won't catch your sleeve, your hand or wrist. Otherwise you will be cursing me and using your cocktail sticks on an effigy of me. Rodney
  17. They will be hip irons. They are screwed to the rafter and stop the hip tiles sliding off the roof. Rodney
  18. My instruction sheet is exactly the same as the pdf posted by Hibelroad. Rodney
  19. I have an instruction sheet for the Pentroller. Track is red and white. 12 - 16v AC is brown and blue. I do not have a scanner but if you would like me to send a photocopy please PM me your address. Rodney
  20. From your photo Rob, it looks as though the plastic tubes are split at both ends. The Mainline and Bachmann ones only seem to split at the 'long' end. It's a very odd design. I've just run my Sentinel and it seems fine. It makes a noise like an angry wasp but is smooth enough. The receipt I kept in the box is dated 2011. Was it really all that time ago ? It might be a good idea to invest in a set of wheels though. Rodney
  21. The wheel problem is a concern. I have a Sentinel that hasn't been used for quite a while so I will have to look at it. I assume the wheels come out quite easily ? The same thing happened with my Bachmann split frame 04 diesel. I also have an old Mainline J72 0-5-0. One wheel has fallen off leaving the Mazak stub in the plastic muff. Who would be a railway modeller ? As a friend always says "why do we do it"? Rodney
  22. Thinking about it I may not need to join. I had 17 of the old Dapol/Hornby Terriers so I must be recovering. Goodness knows why I had that number as they really didn't look much like a Terrier. When the new ones were announced I disposed of 16 of them. Some took a one way trip to Liverpool which sadly can no longer happen. Others went to a friend to go under 3D printed bodies. I did keep one which ran particularly well. I wondered how little I would need to do to make it into a freelance 0-6-0T. Perhaps new buffer beams with lowered buffers and a conventional cab roof might suffice. One day I may actually get around to doing it ! That reminds me of an old friend who built a Will's P class loco kit for his freelance West of England Railway many years ago. He replaced the cab with a simple wrap over one and it completely transformed the appearance for very little work. Rodney
  23. I have three Rails Terriers and ten Hornby ones. Not that I am a Terrier addict ! All the Hornby models run superbly. One of the Rails ones is a very poor runner, one is not too bad and the third is equal to the Hornby models. I think possibly the good Rails model runs a little slower than the Hornby ones. It may be that later Dapol/Rails models are better. Rodney
×
×
  • Create New...