davidparker172
Members-
Posts
111 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Recent Profile Visitors
davidparker172's Achievements
122
Reputation
-
davidparker172 started following Scalescenes boxfile OO layout
-
@gazmanjack have you still got the images for this build that are no longer displayed? I would like to see more of the layout
-
davidparker172 started following Melcombe Road Sidings: A beginner's inglenook and DRS Engineering Works
-
@RobAllen I just wanted to say how much I enjoyed reading this build log. I am in a similar position to you at the beginning, a long time lurker but not actually built anything. Although I am still struggling to come up with a plan I am happy with, your build log here has inspired me to push on. Well done and thanks for the inspiration!!
-
Glenadam Distillery
davidparker172 replied to Northmoor MPD's topic in Boxfiles, Micro layouts & Dioramas
@Northmoor MPD This little micro is absolutely fantastic. I just found it on the Microlayout FB page and immediately came here to find it Superb and just the inspiration i need Have you any earlier fabrication pics to share??? Thankyou and well done!!! -
My first official build log
davidparker172 replied to davidparker172's topic in Boxfiles, Micro layouts & Dioramas
Thankyou! I keep referring back to your build on a daily basis!! -
My first official build log
davidparker172 replied to davidparker172's topic in Boxfiles, Micro layouts & Dioramas
Thankyou very much! Am learning as I go -
My first official build log
davidparker172 replied to davidparker172's topic in Boxfiles, Micro layouts & Dioramas
Hi all Its about time for an update. Things have been going slowly due to life getting in the way but i have been beavering away at any given opportunity so here are some pics in order of the work i have managed so far. I have made it all up as i went along so its not a particular type pf real bridge, not a "real" size, just something that looks right and enables me to learn some new skills. I have used Scalescenes printed sheets for the bricks and stone work and a Wills bridge kit for the steelwork. Part of the enjoyment is working how you are going to do something, but also make sure its removeable so can close the box fie for transport. I am planning on having a standard boxfile to carry some of the separate parts in, which can be taken with the layout. As always, comments and critique are all welcome- 21 replies
-
- 12
-
My first official build log
davidparker172 replied to davidparker172's topic in Boxfiles, Micro layouts & Dioramas
Small update I decided that when joining the boxfiles together, I didn't want to reply on glue only so after some research i found some items called binding screws, so decided to give them a go. A few holes drilled including a sunken bit so the fixture doesn't stand proud of the box wall and i was in business. Also, I have added small magnets (suggested by @Booking Hall) to hold the fold down fronts when in storage. Then i added 5mm foam board at the base of each box file so that I can sink any cables inside this below track level. I had to check with the largest loco I have for this build and luckily i have 8mm to spare so far..... Now the research starts as to exactly what I am going to do in each box file. As always, any comments/critique/suggestions are welcome- 21 replies
-
- 10
-
My first official build log
davidparker172 replied to davidparker172's topic in Boxfiles, Micro layouts & Dioramas
Hi all a question relating to points for this box file please. I want to use Peco electrofrog points operated manually on the track by hand with no point motors obviously. i would also like to the option to use dc or dcc (with correct controllers) depending on what loco I use. Could anyone advise me on which of the “usual” mods to an electrofrog point I need to do…. Or none??? i will be relying on the moving rail to transfer the power. I still get baffled with the point wiring😆 -
My first official build log
davidparker172 replied to davidparker172's topic in Boxfiles, Micro layouts & Dioramas
A small update after the recommendations I received (thanks guys). Firstly, I have decided to to the build in 2 sections, each of 2 boxes fixed together. This means I only have one join to worry about when in use and also means I can space out my streamline points a little rather than squeezing them between the box walls, and also means that the joint between the two sets of boxes is done using track ends not point ends. Secondly, I have now revised the layout over all plan to include a run around loop. I intend on building the first two boxes first as a standalone build, knowing that in future I will move on to the second two boxes. Any comments or suggestions would be gratefully received -
My first official build log
davidparker172 replied to davidparker172's topic in Boxfiles, Micro layouts & Dioramas
@luke the train spotter thanks for the reply. it appears that lack of knowledge on the subject has come to haunt me and yes a runaround is a better idea. i never even thought of two permanent joined boxes…. Good shout! it would still be easy to store etc but also enable less need to faff with track joiners -
My first official build log
davidparker172 replied to davidparker172's topic in Boxfiles, Micro layouts & Dioramas
Thanks @Andrew D Yes Brierley has a lot to answer for, your build is on my follow list too stull not 100% sold on the run around loop but am considering it while I build up these first two box files. -
My first official build log
davidparker172 replied to davidparker172's topic in Boxfiles, Micro layouts & Dioramas
Thanks @Andrew D Yes Brierley has a lot to answer for, your build is on my follow list too stull not 100% sold on the run around loop but am considering it while I build up these first two box files. -
My first official build log
davidparker172 replied to davidparker172's topic in Boxfiles, Micro layouts & Dioramas
@Keith Addenbrooke Thanks for your reply, it makes interesting reading. Of course I don't mind you using the image or for giving your thoughts, this is what I was hoping for. I like your idea for joining up the short siding to make a loop, the only downside is that it means all my box to box joints are two lanes rather than varying it up and having only one lane in at least one joint, but I guess this isn't so important, especially as it gives me a runaround loop. Anymore suggestion or ideas please pass them on😁 With regards to my railway room designs a couple of years ago, it soon became apparent that I was massively trying to run before I could walk, and an entire room layout is something to aim for long term. Projects like these box files and a slightly larger one I have planned should enable me to learnt the hobby first. -
Hi all After being massively inspired by @Booking Hall fantastic build of Brierley Canal Road I decided that it would be a good idea to start a build log, hoping for help, inspiration, suggestions, advice and also to motivate me to stick with the build and make progress. I worked out a suitable track plan to share along four box files, trying to avoid a straight copy or Brierley (but there are only so many options to fit in a box file). I have decided to use Peco Streamline Electrofrog points after reading multiple negative comments about using set track on a box file. The Peco streamline points are longer than set track and so are a tight fit in the box files but i think its manageable. I am an experienced modeller but am new to railways, just a long time lurker on here, so am learning the ropes. Please see below images of my track plan plus a few pictures of where I am up to. Thanks Dave
-
Boxfile on a Budget - Phase 2
davidparker172 replied to Andrew D's topic in Boxfiles, Micro layouts & Dioramas
@Andrew D Thanks for that. Mine are similar design to what you have described so hoping it will do the same!!!