MrWolf

Not at all, I've had TS125 / 150 / 250 over the years. Any bike that can be dragged out of a shed for £20 and put back on the road with a new fuse holder and a universal brake lamp switch to replace the one inside the rear hub has to be a winner, that was a 1977 TS150. Great bikes, if they could have modernised production, they might still be with us.

That doesn't explain the worldwide following for them though does it? We did at one time make the best and most popular bikes in the world, as Japan does now. Other machines from Europe and America tended to be much more expensive and wars with Italy and Germany didn't help sales either, other than cheap lightweights. Quite a few British companies did get a start by fitting Peugeot engines and other French makes into their own frames. So it's not rose tinted daydreaming of the old empire that has some of us riding old British bikes, we ride them because we like them. I've owned and ridden lots of Japanese bikes, Moto Guzzi, Mobylette, BMW and once even a Harley Davidson (But I don't like to talk about what became named the Push Bike.) I'd love to own an MV Agusta, as my childhood hero was Agostini, but I simply can't afford one and that's that.

Post 1956/7 I would have to agree, particularly those powered by the Piatti derived Villiers engines. They really should have paid more attention to what the Germans were developing, we've made that mistake a few times and it could have cost us dearly when the powers that be were so dismissive about the development of jet engines in the thirties. Motorcycle snobs like to sneer at the MZ, but Japanese manufacturers realised back in the fifties that it was only their parent country's regime that was holding them back from becoming world beaters. (Shudder...) Just plain awful. BSA should have taken the Dandy, stood it alongside a Honda Cub and had a jolly good word with themselves. Not so many years ago, I ended up with a running Tina, another in bits and a bunch of NOS brightwork and other parts for £80. I think that tells you all you need to know. I suspect the engine and transmission would be better off powering a record player... Then there was the BSA Ariel Three...

They certainly were slow, ideal for chugging around town or on the back lanes at 40mph, but avoid bypasses and motorways! The one I had very nearly got scrapped by a dealer for its girder forks as they fit the desirable models from the thirties. The vendor has been offered X amount over the phone by someone I knew of, so I turned up with a van and the asking price, which was still a bargain. I fettled it up and ran it more or less as found, with new tyres, brakes and wiring loom. When my other half passed her test she used it to get used to the foot controls being on the proper side until hitting 25 when she could get much cheaper classic insurance on the Speed Twin. The falling off incident was at a stop line on a very steep hill opposite the city grammar school (Yes they do still exist!) She'd pulled up at the line and thanks to a generous application of diesel and rain her foot went one way and the front wheel the other. As always happens at such embarrassing moments there was an audience of school kids, doubtless with their phones out, as she was trying to heave the bike upright. Frustrated, hot and bothered with the weight of the bike making it slide towards the junction she took off her helmet. At this point about a dozen boys rushed over in full Lancelot mode, picked up the bike and set it upright on the pavement so she could restart it. There's definitely advantages to being female. In a typical case of "The more there were, the less there are" as American collectors put it, the little ride to work bikes from the thirties and forties are pretty thin on the ground compared to expensive and sporting machines. Back in the fifties my father had a lot of 250 and 350 bikes such as B21 and B22 models which were often available for £2 or less, which he fixed up and put the profits towards a 1954 Norton 88. I often think that a time machine would be handy!

When it comes to early motor vans a dark grey or black top would suggest Rexine or painted canvas over wadding and wooden slats as the form of roof construction, whereas a body coloured roof would suggest aluminium or steel sheet over a wooden frame.

This kind of thing? I searched for BSA silencer clip on eBay, there's assorted sizes: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/371505475557

Definitely not, especially as we are all our own worst critics, if we're proud of what we've done, it must be good. Besides, we build these models to please ourselves and create a scene we enjoy looking at. So I'd say you've hit the bullseye.

As promised, pictures of today's haul, found literally across the road from a friend's house. They've been in pieces since 1980 and before that had spent years dumped behind another garage. They're both 250cc BSA C11 models. One is a 1951 3 speed example with the 40's style speedometer in the fuel tank. The other is a 1953 4 speed with the B31 style tank with the chrome speed stripes on the tank sides. I'm planning on reassembling the 1953 bike as it's more complete into something that will at least kick over and moving it on. The 1951 bike will be subject to a full restoration once I have finished the Star Twin, it is currently returning, phoenix like from the ashes of last summer's fire. We used to have a girder fork C10 and often regret selling it. (Despite the fact that Miss R fell off it while at walking pace!) Frame, forks and odds for the '53. Ditto for the '51. ZC11 engine for the '51, complete bar the carburettor and it turns over freely. Front mudguard for the '51, the 4 speed box for the '53 and various cycle parts. Lots of bits of the '53 along with some extras. BC11 engine and various bits of tinwork for the '53. How the 1951 bike should look: How the 1953 bike should look: The only major part missing is the fuel tank for the 1953 model if anyone knows where there is one?

The better remembered Hurst transmissions could boil the road in first gear and were enjoyed by both sexes.

At the point of "You're only supposed to blow the bloody doors off!" he realised he'd been standing too close and nearly blown his knob off too....

The original badge was a dead giveaway with its bomber motif.

Or boasting of some other prowess? Seriously though, he looks like he should be standing on a dockside coiling up a rope.

I have acquired a pile of rust which allegedly contains two motorcycles. I'm collecting / digging them out tomorrow, so I'll post some pictures of the haul.

Ditto, twenty years.

I suspect that we're no longer allowed to ask?

It's possibly made from some evil form of plastic that doesn't like glue. Or: Repairing it may impinge upon the profit margin.

It might be free postage, but it's still around double what you'd expect to pay for this beater: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/305409392237

Good, I think you'd find what others consider normal to be incredibly boring! I certainly do.

Cracking rendition of a bit of traditional British rural grot.

Painted with a fork?

You do realise that Little Muddle is up a flight of stairs?

I like that, I can picture standing on that platform, just as it's starting to rain like mad... And of course the train doors are locked!

They look more like the yokels from "Wrong Turn" to me...

All is safe, nobody mentioned post 1970 buses on the bridge. Vespas can fly, but they don't float. Legend has it there's quite a few in the Thames beneath Chelsea Bridge...

You'll have to wait until tomorrow, when they've been detailed and repainted beyond all recognition.